What was it?
NAS B4LDY
Think they had his real one up to, something like NASR 567
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What was it?
If we'd set 401 to win we'd have lost by 5 wickets.All that counts.![]()
Wasn't it Waugh's Australia that started the fad for not enforcing the follow on and setting impossible targets though? However over there you were almost guaranteed 5 full days play.This.
Waugh's Australia would have declared ages ago, or enforced the follow on. We are too cautious at times.
Windies batted again inThe West Indies, Australia, South Africa, India, even NZ themselves would have enforced the follow on and gone for the win without any doubt in the same circumstances.
If we'd set 401 to win we'd have lost by 5 wickets.
Wasn't it Waugh's Australia that started the fad for not enforcing the follow on and setting impossible targets though? However over there you were almost guaranteed 5 full days play.
I'd have put NZ back in.
Windies batted again inYou must be logged on to see external linkswhen they had a 250 1st innings lead.
We wouldve been into the tail now if we hadnt batted for so long.
39 overs possible tonight. That might be all we get as well
As everybody seems to be on this thread just thought I would say well done to the Durham lads 273 is a good score, should be enough to win I think
We batted for at least an session too long, and Cooks field placings are very negative
We batted for at least an hour too long, and Cooks field placings are very negative