• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

england v sri lanka second test thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter stephen cartwright
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
dangermows said:
correct, which i was saying right from the off.

thought this england set up had a bit of a ruthless streak but instead they took the easy option and picked finn, and it proved costly as the attack was too one dimensional.

we also batted for around 50 runs too many imo.

we played some decent cricket but the decision making was poor for this test.
Click to expand...

South Africans are always conservative by nature
 

Strauss is more defensive than an Italian football team who is 1-0 up with 10 mins to play. No way the Lankans were ever going to try and chase down 280+ in two sessions a batsman short. 1-1 Series away draw is a major plus for them.
 
dangermows said:
correct, which i was saying right from the off.

thought this england set up had a bit of a ruthless streak but instead they took the easy option and picked finn, and it proved costly as the attack was too one dimensional.

we also batted for around 50 runs too many imo.

we played some decent cricket but the decision making was poor for this test.
Click to expand...

Didn't Finn get the most wickets of all the English bowlers in this game? The lad goes for runs but has a knack of picking up wickets. Still shouldn't have been picked in the first place though.
 
Andy.SAFC said:
Didn't Finn get the most wickets of all the English bowlers in this game? The lad goes for runs but has a knack of picking up wickets. Still shouldn't have been picked in the first place though.
Click to expand...

like he was in Australia which was nothing short of a disgrace
 
dangermows said:
correct, which i was saying right from the off.

thought this england set up had a bit of a ruthless streak but instead they took the easy option and picked finn, and it proved costly as the attack was too one dimensional.

we also batted for around 50 runs too many imo.

we played some decent cricket but the decision making was poor for this test.
Click to expand...

Like who mate? Not many authentic swing bowlers about. Mark Eahlam?
 
essex boy said:
Finn had done the hard work, Bresnan cleaned up in the last two tests
Click to expand...

We won one, lost one and drew one of the tests Finn played. It's not like the series was won before Bresnan came into the team. We then won the two without Finn by an innings.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top