Northumbria Police abusing their position :-

Status
Not open for further replies.


Hell's teeth it's a bloody good job some of you lot are not running the justice system you would be every bit as bad at it as you say the police are. I have no idea of what actually went on between these people but you do realise that the person making the allegations is not claiming to have witnessed any of the events but heard them as rumour from another party. I don't know if any one is going to produce any evidence but at the moment the "case against" looks a bit flimsy to say the least.

Agreed. The alleged actions by these police officers took place in 2007, and everyone knows you're supposed to wait at least 25 years before starting to do anything about allegations of police wrongdoing.
 
Agreed. The alleged actions by these police officers took place in 2007, and everyone knows you're supposed to wait at least 25 years before starting to do anything about allegations of police wrongdoing.
I can understand what you are saying up to a point but I think that you are confusing the investigation of actual events and their consequences with with an unsubstantiated rumour/ gossip. If there has been any wrong doing it should be investigated but there does have to be a bit of evidence other than just the say so of someone who heard it third our fourth hand who is now making it public in support of her employment claim which if she won would be worth several thousand pounds.
 
I can understand what you are saying up to a point but I think that you are confusing the investigation of actual events and their consequences with with an unsubstantiated rumour/ gossip. If there has been any wrong doing it should be investigated but there does have to be a bit of evidence other than just the say so of someone who heard it third our fourth hand who is now making it public in support of her employment claim which if she won would be worth several thousand pounds.

Deciding whether things are rumours or true sounds like a lot of hard work. How about we round them up at a train station, beat the living fuck out of them, get the local paper to say they attacked us, get them sacked from their jobs and bar them from going anywhere they're a paid up member of for three years?
 
There is almost nothing that I could read about the police which would surprise me. There are undoubtedly many very good coppers, but I've encountered far too many of them who are complete weapons and seem to be in the service for all the wrong reasons.

The police behaviour at Orgreave during the miners strike was in the news again. We had the Hillsborough verdict last week where the altering of police statements, lying, and covering up were systematic. I don't think much has changed in the intervening years and I'm certain if the police can cover up reprehensible behaviour they will.

Fine line between police and criminals
 
I can understand what you are saying up to a point but I think that you are confusing the investigation of actual events and their consequences with with an unsubstantiated rumour/ gossip. If there has been any wrong doing it should be investigated but there does have to be a bit of evidence other than just the say so of someone who heard it third our fourth hand who is now making it public in support of her employment claim which if she won would be worth several thousand pounds.

Ah the Savile defence! It's just s rumour, probably isn't true.....
 
Deciding whether things are rumours or true sounds like a lot of hard work. How about we round them up at a train station, beat the living fuck out of them, get the local paper to say they attacked us, get them sacked from their jobs and bar them from going anywhere they're a paid up member of for three years?

You forgot getting some pictures of perfectly healthy dogs in the Chronicle, and pretending that pixie, puffy and miffy had been brutally attacked by the rabid coppers.
 
I obviously won't comment on specifics but the bosses I encountered were a bunch of back stabbing! Lock their own mothers up types !!!
 
It just keeps coming.... Latest allegation

Bloke in "standards" offers to do some background snooping on a colleagues partner, as a result he pressures her into a bj, she complains, he's moved out of standards but not sacked so he can get his pension

All conjecture of course, the boys in blue would never behave in such a manner but it's beginning to look like!e theypissed off the wrong lady !
 
It just keeps coming.... Latest allegation

Bloke in "standards" offers to do some background snooping on a colleagues partner, as a result he pressures her into a bj, she complains, he's moved out of standards but not sacked so he can get his pension

All conjecture of course, the boys in blue would never behave in such a manner but it's beginning to look like!e theypissed off the wrong lady !

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

The clip of them.

I was looking at a 'police forum' about a year or so ago, think it might have been to see their reactions to the Hillsborough verdict back then IIRC, anyway, there was a thread on there about the formal part of the application process where you get assessed. Some of the posts were f***ing brilliant, e.g. "I had some gear 2 weeks ago, will that show up on my test." 'My house mate was smoking a joint and he gave it to me and I thought it was a cigarette, but it turns out it was weed, will I be tested?" etc.

TBH most the people on there were telling them to fuck off, but it still shows there's a good number of them who couldn't give a shit.
 
I don't think anyone is under any illusion how disgraceful this lot are after Hayley Adamson and the Moat/Rathband debacles.
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-having-affair-high-ranking-officer-wife.html

"A high-ranking police officer attacked his chief constable at a barbecue when he found out he was having an affair with his wife, a tribunal has heard.

Jim Peacock, chief superintendent at Northumbria Police, allegedly lashed out at his boss Mike Craik after discovering he was in a relationship with his wife Carolyn Peacock, assistant chief constable at the same force.

The alleged incident took place during a gathering at Mr Craik's house and led to officers being called to the property to try and calm the situation.

But it is claimed the call-out was later deleted from the police log - on the demands of the chief constable - amid fears the alleged fracas would be made public.

The force also sought to stop the allegations being fully reported by requesting the court ban the identity of the three former officers - an order that was lifted today..."

Apologies for DM source - the article reads terribly on all concerned though - you get the feeling at times that some of the police forces in this country are 10 years behind where you'd hope them to be in terms of their attitudes and think they can get away with what they please.

Any gossip on this @duffman?
Crack.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top