1980s new builds weren’t built to a great standard.Maybe something in-between, something from the 80s/90s?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1980s new builds weren’t built to a great standard.Maybe something in-between, something from the 80s/90s?
If they put in a full membrane (rather than chemical) then they'd have to cut all the way through the brick course otherwise it won't achieve anything other than make the damp, if it is rising damp, go around the DPM. If it's Victorian then you'll have solid brick walls in Flemish bond and no cavity,If it’s an outside wall is it down from outside to minimise the impact on internal decor ? Guess on an internal wall you’re buggered either way
I was thinking more size for money ratio.1980s new builds weren’t built to a great standard.
It’ll be more than a few quid!…
Agree but a new build for the same price is literally not livable in when you have kids. I’d rather pay a few extra quid a month in heating bills than live in a shoe box
Mine was condensation and covered the bottom of the wall, to about a foot above sleeping height. Add to what the lime plaster kicked out, it did look the same as on vids. I later made it worse by drying clothes and giving the entire room spot mould thoughNo bigger than the "it has damp so must avoid" stance
Unlikely mind as condensation presents differently.
For legal reasons, no comment.Was that the one you bought from Lee?
Did you have a nice fireplace and other original features?I've had damp proofing put in too (that same 100 year old house).
Had to rip all the plastering off to get back to the bricks. Then replaster. then get super-anal about the skim finish going over with sandpaper. Then all the cleaning and then having to repaint he whole wall.
Was a messy job.
Did it shiteDid you have a nice fireplace and other original features?
The Victorian house that I bought had wood chip on the wall… but it wasn’t very small.Did it shite
It seemed like a bargain at the time.For legal reasons, no comment.
Well that's going to be stuck in my head all day.The Victorian house that I bought had wood chip on the wall… but it wasn’t very small.
If they put in a full membrane (rather than chemical) then they'd have to cut all the way through the brick course otherwise it won't achieve anything other than make the damp, if it is rising damp, go around the DPM.
It was great value.It seemed like a bargain at the time.
Yeah, that's true, timing was unlucky.It was great value.
Until it wasn't. 2008 crash did for us.
Probably broke even cash-wise. Certainly not time-wise. I still shudder driving past the Easington turn off on the A19 from the number of times I had to do a couple of hours work on my way home from work.
Good learning experience though, I suppose.
Tax rules have changed though. It isn’t as easy for evil slum landlords to profit from misery.Yeah, that's true, timing was unlucky.
Rents are through the roof these days, you could have made a canny sum these days, maybe?
Oi! lolTax rules have changed though. It isn’t as easy for evil slum landlords to profit from misery.
Is the ground floor concrete or timber?Need the advice of the SMB builders ….
House I’m looking to buy has got low level rising damp in a couple of areas. One is an outside wall the other is an internal wall. Didn’t realise you can get damp in internal walls !
When I’ve asked what this is / means etc the response I’ve been given over the phone (there’s a report being sent out apparently) is that there’s a few isolated areas that have damp spots just above the skirting board, not full on rising damp but a couple of spots along skirting boards.
When I’ve done a quick google search a chemical treatment seems the least intrusive way to sort it rather than adding a membrane to a full wall?
Any expert advice on best approach and idea on cost ?