Like most in senior management,Harker probably had a lucrative redundancy or severance package written into his contract. I assume that the board wanted to get rid when the financial mess the club was in came to light but then found how costly it would be to get rid so he was retained by default. Pure guesswork on my behalf but it seems the only logical explanation.We can blame him for the dire financial situation the club are in. I always found it a bit suspicious that he left the club then re-joined not long after, seemed a bit odd.