Clubs telling untruths about transfer fees

[safcrhys.]

One of my pet hates is when a club pays an "undisclosed" fee for a player.

 

[Lee Street]

the majority arent.

I love anecdotal facts

 

[ollie c]

Why should it matter?

We either turn up to watch Sunderland play footy or we don't. However you dress it up it comes down to that.

 

[jcrossan]

Does it mean we only paid £1m for Graham?

I always hoped the 5m stood for five mints.

 

[Father Jack Hackett]

With that dozy old gonk MoN we'd have paid the maximum possible.
He's got lots of previous

How often has he negotiated deals like?

 

[flusheding]

Wonder went Bent went for then

 

[hank williams]

One of my pet hates is when a club pays an "undisclosed" fee for a player.

Mine too why can't they be more open

 

[Perryqhill]

I don't for one second believe MON directly negotiated the price with Swansea's board of directors...

He did as far as Des is concerned, so too did Keane and they both had a free reign to name their price. Bruce however barely got a say on the player.

 

[castoff]

Apart from appeasing the fans, you would think the selling club would like people to believe they had actually received less for a player that they had sold so as to avoid other clubs trying to sting them for a higher price for any subsequent player they might look to sign.