• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Wrestling 2013 - Part 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spug
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.

Taker 49 today, mental at his age he's still one of the best. Nailed on mania next year will be his last.
 
Taker 49 today, mental at his age he's still one of the best. Nailed on mania next year will be his last.
Not a fan at all. He actually bores me to death. Turns up, does that daft thing with his eyes, says a few lines of rubbish about death etc then buggers off. He's obviously a legend but I think he should jack it in now.
 
Not a fan at all. He actually bores me to death. Turns up, does that daft thing with his eyes, says a few lines of rubbish about death etc then buggers off. He's obviously a legend but I think he should jack it in now.
Reminds me of my childhood, I love how dramatic he is going on about dragging Lesnar's corpse to hell and that, proper old school OTT wrestling
 
I said that same the other simply because I'd prefer to see Lesnar end his streak over the likes of John Cena
I'm not really into wrestling deep enough to care about the whole streak thing. I just love Brock. :lol: The bloeke is a freak.
 
Cena will go over taker next year IMO, he's the WWE's Guy, the next Hogan. Sadly him having 17 title reigns won't be enough for the WWE's "Cena Legacy"
 
Cena will go over taker next year IMO, he's the WWE's Guy, the next Hogan. Sadly him having 17 title reigns won't be enough for the WWE's "Cena Legacy"
Can't see it, nobody will beat the streak. Makes taker much less marketable on dvds, merchandise etc. It's a huge gimmick for wwe.
 
Can't see it, nobody will beat the streak. Makes taker much less marketable on dvds, merchandise etc. It's a huge gimmick for wwe.

Do you ever think they intended for him to have a streak? Or do you think they kind of accidentally booked themselves into it and decided to make something of it?
 
Do you ever think they intended for him to have a streak? Or do you think they kind of accidentally booked themselves into it and decided to make something of it?
Something I've always wondered. Probably got to 6/7 then though, 'ere, let's have a streak'. :lol:

Certainly interesting like. Imagine if they had him lose early on
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top