Under FA Cup rules we would have been entitled to 15% of capacity so unless the mags were going to build a temporary stand yes they would have had to move home fans.
There have been no protests that I recall either
You’re arguing against facts, you’re the one with your pants down. That being said, we’re all allowed and opinion.Not this shit again.
I'm not going round in circles covering old ground, it was handled disgracefully by the club
Fair comment but you can't accommodate extra away fans without moving home fans.
Can you remember after the Millwall game? The patsy to the board whinging about being frustrated because of the striker situation and the club need to sort it in the summer?
There was definitely appetite for protests but not enough numbers to do so. If I recall, @Guinness Guzzler put it to the RAWA about who would be unhappy enough to protest against the ownership and it was an overwhelming no.There have been no protests that I recall either
They sacked the "patsy" not long after.
No they didn't as you're thinking about that wrong Millwall game.They sacked the "patsy" not long after.
What Millwall game we talking about like?
Well it wasn't the away game.
There hasn't been any protests mate, so the poster who is comparing us to the scum up the road is way off the mark.
I know there hasn't been any but there's definitely a portion of the fanbase that want to it's just not enough to make it worthwhile. Obviously, we've had the banners in the ground also from the group that fell out of the flags business.
“Talk of protest”
Again nothing happened unlike what the scum did, you are miles off in your attempt to compare our fans with them .
