• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

WMS Who Owns Sunderland AFC?

Status
Not open for further replies.
kildaremackem said:
the best way for fans to be able to hold owners to account is for a club to be profitable...because if its profitable..owners will listen to those who made it so, ie the fans, whereas if a club incurs heavy losses so the owner is paying out..then the ower wont listen to those who made it loss making, ie the fans
Click to expand...
The fans make it loss making? KildarseCharlie has excelled himself here.
 

kildaremackem said:
its the lieteral truth of how the world works..fans asking an owner who is keeping their club alive to listen to them is bzzare..fans whi are providing the money that keeps the owner in profit are very valuable to the owner
Click to expand...

Fans don't keep an owner in profit if that owner millions and millions on Will Grigg and selling off future assets for next to nowt.

Not many owners take over a club to keep it alive either so lets not pretend they only do it out of the goodness of their hearts.
 
kildaremackem said:
yes he can do that..very tax efficient too..though that probably wont bother him as he is swiss but also the company he owns it via is offshore.
if he does it via loans..which is far more sensible than via shares...SAFC eds up oweing him money...better for him..worse for the club...
but also..a future buyer of the lub wouldnt like the loans and would deduct it from sale price..
Click to expand...
So you finally agree I was right. We got there in the end.
 
Ashley In!! said:
So you finally agree I was right. We got there in the end.
Click to expand...
he could do it..never disagreed with that..just said it wouldnt be the smartest approach as it would likely make the shares worth less in future..and i dont see how safc is going to generate the cash to repay him his loans in future without a sale of the club..the club hasnt been cash flow positive for years id have thought
the reason to use loans is protetcion if it goes bust, or for tax reasons..neither of which apply under KLD.
The Jarra Wanderer said:
So who is responsible for making any business attractive to “customers“?
Click to expand...
the management of the business. And under short he did lots of things to imprive the prduct, but the customers never came, the losses came, so he fucked the club off and now its in league one
 
kildaremackem said:
he could do it..never disagreed with that..just said it wouldnt be the smartest approach as it would likely make the shares worth less in future..and i dont see how safc is going to generate the cash to repay him his loans in future without a sale of the club..the club hasnt been cash flow positive for years id have thought
the reason to use loans is protetcion if it goes bust, or for tax reasons..neither of which apply under KLD.

the management of the business. And under short he did lots of things to imprive the prduct, but the customers never came, the losses came, so he fucked the club off and now its in league one
Click to expand...

Wow.
 
The point is if KLD is in it for the money which i hope he is,then January is vital to him.He isnt gonna make money unless he gets it right here.The worry i have is he might be happy to start the rise in a couple of years time after sorting the wheat from the chaff in a few windows.Which in theory could work but doubt the fans would put up with that for long,in fact if we fail to go up this year season tickets will drop dramatically.Especially if ownership is clouded in mystery.
 
samaistonsrightfoot said:
Fans don't keep an owner in profit if that owner millions and millions on Will Grigg and selling off future assets for next to nowt.

Not many owners take over a club to keep it alive either so lets not pretend they only do it out of the goodness of their hearts.
Click to expand...
i know the arent doing it out of the goodness of their hearts..every owner buys a club with interest in mind...sometimes that self interest is totally profit..sometimes its other stuff..but there are no benefactor owners,...just good owners and bad owners
 
Sea to Shining Sea said:
That’s highly debatable
Click to expand...
I think the vast majority of campaigns against owners have little or no effect. "Cowie Out" "Red Cards" and so on. Not to mention all the protests up at the landfill that just embarrassed their fans.

Should we have a pretend victor in a Sunderland strip giving last rites to a coffin??

You may as well go and shout at the sea.
 
kildaremackem said:
he could do it..never disagreed with that..just said it wouldnt be the smartest approach as it would likely make the shares worth less in future..and i dont see how safc is going to generate the cash to repay him his loans in future without a sale of the club..the club hasnt been cash flow positive for years id have thought
the reason to use loans is protetcion if it goes bust, or for tax reasons..neither of which apply under KLD.

the management of the business. And under short he did lots of things to imprive the prduct, but the customers never came, the losses came, so he fucked the club off and now its in league one
Click to expand...

You've posted some shite on here previously like but this takes the piss.
 
stevo said:
The point is if KLD is in it for the money which i hope he is,then January is vital to him.He isnt gonna make money unless he gets it right here.The worry i have is he might be happy to start the rise in a couple of years time after sorting the wheat from the chaff in a few windows.Which in theory could work but doubt the fans would put up with that for long,in fact if we fail to go up this year season tickets will drop dramatically.Especially if ownership is clouded in mystery.
Click to expand...

KLD has said multiple times the aim is self sustainability and not to really expect anything quickly (im para phrasing as can't remember the exact wording) so can't see him chucking money at it in Jan, although Madbob is saying he's changed his mind now.
 
samaistonsrightfoot said:
KLD has said multiple times the aim is self sustainability and not to really expect anything quickly (im para phrasing as can't remember the exact wording) so can't see him chucking money at it in Jan, although Madbob is saying he's changed his mind now.
Click to expand...
Hope madbobs right this time mate
 
samaistonsrightfoot said:
It allows people to choose what they want to do with the information given and to be able to hold those people who own the club to account.

Clarity in football is a good thing which should be encouraged. Fan representation (and I don't mean owners friends, business contacts or celebrities) at board level would be great but won't happen because owners don't want people to know what they are doing.

And that is for all clubs which is why an overwhelmimg majority of fans ask for it. The new ownership has promised it for nearly a year but has yet to give it.

Opposing anyone who wants clarity on the basis that 'it doesn' t matter who owns the club' is bizarre when the person, or people, who own it are responsible for whether it sparkles or implodes.


Which is why other owners are relvant. If KLD feels like a loan is needed, and the others can't afford it or refuse to do it, then it holds the club back if he is unwilling to do it himself on that basis and they become detrimental to targets and growth.
Click to expand...
I agree clarity is a good thing, but let's be realistic you have no means to hold them to account. The harsh reality is those with the money who own the club call the shots.
samaistonsrightfoot said:
Which is why other owners are relvant. If KLD feels like a loan is needed, and the others can't afford it or refuse to do it, then it holds the club back if he is unwilling to do it himself on that basis and they become detrimental to targets and growth.
Click to expand...

He would just go down the share issue route.
 
Hep said:
I agree clarity is a good thing, but let's be realistic you have no means to hold them to account. The harsh reality is those with the money who own the club call the shots.


He would just go down the share issue route.
Click to expand...

Of course. The post is in response to them stopping him from wanting to loan instead of a share issue.

Holding an owner to the account isn't the same as a random fan calling the shots at board room level 😂
 
Last edited:
riffraff said:
Agreed.
I posted a few years back when the club shops dotted around the NE were closing that we need mobile shops. Theyre all ower outside grounds at tournaments like the euros and WCs.
A few big mobile vans going round the markets and town centres and shopping centres of the NE midweek and then around the car parks etc outside the ground on match days to catch fans coming from all the major pedestrian routes ower the surrounding area.
Theres no passing trade on the far side of the ground, nivver has been, nivver will be. The logic of building the ticket office away from the ground but not the club shop is plain unadulterated lunacy.
Click to expand...
This! Turn what is currently the club shop into a cafe/bar and combine the ticket office with the shop.
 
kildaremackem said:
he could do it..never disagreed with that..just said it wouldnt be the smartest approach as it would likely make the shares worth less in future..and i dont see how safc is going to generate the cash to repay him his loans in future without a sale of the club..the club hasnt been cash flow positive for years id have thought
the reason to use loans is protetcion if it goes bust, or for tax reasons..neither of which apply under KLD.

the management of the business. And under short he did lots of things to imprive the prduct, but the customers never came, the losses came, so he fucked the club off and now its in league one
Click to expand...

I’ve read some shit on here but :lol:
 
kildaremackem said:
its the lieteral truth of how the world works..fans asking an owner who is keeping their club alive to listen to them is bzzare..fans whi are providing the money that keeps the owner in profit are very valuable to the owner
Click to expand...
Shut up man ye daft arse. :lol:

Honestly man. I dunno why I've bothered responding tbh.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top