We should play 442



4 2 3 1 is just a fancy 4 4 2.
Even the ‘classic’ 442 was often 4-4-1-1 with a deeper forward. There were many permutations and it could be fluid.

A back 4 usually has 1 cb attacking the ball and one covering.

One of the central midfielders is usually screening the defence, 1 more attacking.

So a 442 can quite easily be 1-3-1-3-1-1

:lol:
 
..................Patterson...................
Hume.....Ballard.....O'9.....Hyelde
Mundle...Neil..Ekwah..Aouchiche
............Hemir.........Rusyn...........

Subs: Bishop Pembele Seelt Styles
Ba Jobe Rigg Burstow Watson
 
Seeing as Clarke and Roberts are out for the foreseeable .

Let's chuck hemir and rusyn up front and see what happens. On paper, as a partnership it looks perfect really.

Full backs stay back, couple of able runners on the flanks to bomb on / get back.

Balls to it, let's at least experiment and try something attacking for the remainder of the season

Kristjaan speakman is the one who picks the side and formation, substitutions etc

Think Father Ted but instead of fake hands he has a fake head
 
……………., Patto……………
……..Seelt….Ballard….Hjelde
…………………..09………………….,
Mundle …Neil….Rigg.. Aouchiche
…………..Hemir…..Rusyn……
 

Back
Top