Di Canios Knees
Midfield
VAR as a whole isn’t the best, but an offside is offside. It’s the dodgy handballs that VAR give and the yellows overturned to red that’s shit. Offside is offside whether by a midge’s dick or 3 yards.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We’d want it given against us.It’s not man. It was level. Look at that picture. That’s not offside.
Level as to whatever degree VAR is capable of declaring, I’m not arguing I’m asking a question.
Thor'd below from match threadYou mustn't have seen the right one one. It showed he was off. They don't give offside if they are level.
those pictures dont match, look at the player kicking the ball on both. Unless I am seeing thingsThor'd below from match thread
It looks closer with the lines because the 2 lines are made thicker than a thin line to give the attacker a slight benefit of doubt plus it's being viewed on a TV screen making it closer again. It only looks close only because it's a gap of a few pixels but the gap will be between the 2 lines. If you were stood there on the pitch looking across it would be a clear offside, it's just the fact the Coventry player is further away and it tricks the eye. I explained all this crap ages ago and it's why I don't get bothered about offsides as it's pointless yet some still say it's level or a toenail when it's not really.
https://www.readytogo.net/smb/threa...orts-ultra-hdr-⚽️.1616367/page-7#post-3915857
Look down where the linesman is and you can see how thick the 2 lines are in relation to the linesman as they're clearly a few inches each in reality as together they're the width of this calf. The blue line starts at Bassaka's toe going towards the goal adding inches 'advantage' on and the red line comes back away from the goal partially covering the Coventry player's boot. Even with the thicker lines, the 2 won't have overlapped even if they look close due to the shitty image as the computer VAR use knows this.
Logon or register to see this image
Logon or register to see this image
Draw a simple thin line halfway between the grass lines without the advantage of the thicker lines and it gives you a different viewing perspective. The red and blue lines would be to the left of the thin blue line below and Bassaka's toenail as I've added a bit of it below to show it. The thick blue line is Bassaka's line and adds a little more forward towards Hadji. The thick red line is Haji's and comes back slightly towards Bassaka due to the thickness. If the 2 line edges manage to overlap by just 1 pixel then it's given onside as that is the advantage of the thicker lines. It just looks closer due to the shitty quality (this is done on purpose) small image they hoy up.
Someone has done similar to what I did above. It was offside by a few inches which is shite but it was the correct decision.
You must be logged on to see media items
Wan Bisakas hand is playing him onside ... even if his feet are not
Good post mate. He's actually well off.Thor'd below from match thread
It looks closer with the lines because the 2 lines are made thicker than a thin line to give the attacker a slight benefit of doubt plus it's being viewed on a TV screen making it closer again. It only looks close only because it's a gap of a few pixels but the gap will be between the 2 lines. If you were stood there on the pitch looking across it would be a clear offside, it's just the fact the Coventry player is further away and it tricks the eye. I explained all this crap ages ago and it's why I don't get bothered about offsides as it's pointless yet some still say it's level or a toenail when it's not really.
https://www.readytogo.net/smb/threa...orts-ultra-hdr-⚽️.1616367/page-7#post-3915857
Look down where the linesman is and you can see how thick the 2 lines are in relation to the linesman as they're clearly a few inches each in reality as together they're the width of this calf. The blue line starts at Bassaka's toe going towards the goal adding inches 'advantage' on and the red line comes back away from the goal partially covering the Coventry player's boot. Even with the thicker lines, the 2 won't have overlapped even if they look close due to the shitty image as the computer VAR use knows this.
Logon or register to see this image
Logon or register to see this image
Draw a simple thin line halfway between the grass lines without the advantage of the thicker lines and it gives you a different viewing perspective. The red and blue VAR lines would be between Bassaka's toenail and left of the thin blue line below. I've added a bit of the VAR lines below to show it. The thick blue line is Bassaka's line and adds a little more forward towards Hadji. The thick red line is Haji's and comes back slightly towards Bassaka due to the thickness. If the 2 line edges manage to overlap by just 1 pixel then it's given onside as that is the advantage of the thicker lines. It just looks closer due to the shitty quality (this is done on purpose) small image they hoy up.
Someone has done similar to what I did above. It was offside by a few inches which is shite but it was the correct decision.
You must be logged on to see media items
Wan Bisakas hand is playing him onside ... even if his feet are not
No wonder people are getting angry when they don't even know the rules.The hand isn't relevant though.
And while we’re at it, just say if it hits any part of the arm at all it’s a foul irrespective of unnatural body shapes and what have you.
Yes it's an image off Twitter I've hoyed lines on that's a frame later. The ball has moved slightly but not the feet of the players so 'offside' points still in same position. If anything, it's Bissaka who would have moved more (his shoulder) as Coventry player is more static. I just didn't say as my post was already an essay!those pictures dont match, look at the player kicking the ball on both. Unless I am seeing things
They need to look at what the offside law was brought in for - presumably to stop goal-hanging.
Nobody’s going to do that so imo it needs a rethink. The obvious solution being the opposite way round so as long as the attacker has one part of his body equal to the last defender he is ok.
Bring back the goal moochersJust abolish offside. It’ll be great. It’ll make the top coaches have to rethink their entire way of playing. Be hellish