• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Trescothick

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Breen Machine said:
He's certainly got some of the hallmarks of Bell at that age, excellent against spin, moves his feet well and seems to have a good temperment and appetite for big scores.

In the last 12-18 months I'd have gone for Hildreth as next in line behind Morgan but I've definitley been won over by Taylor and would like to see him get a chance in the near future. Back up batsman in India possibly?
Click to expand...

He should be but its slightly complicated by England probably wanting the option to play with 2 seamers, 2 spinners and therefore a batsman that can bowl pretty well. It might mean they look to Stokes or Bopara (hope not) for that reason.
 

rentaghost said:
He should be but its slightly complicated by England probably wanting the option to play with 2 seamers, 2 spinners and therefore a batsman that can bowl pretty well. It might mean they look to Stokes or Bopara (hope not) for that reason.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately you are right which would be a shame. Taylor bowls a bit of leg spin but don't think it's as useful or advanced as the overs you could get from Bopara.
 
Great batsman though. What shame his health stopped him being part of the unstoppable English Test machine.
 
essex boy said:
was this the same Aussies with Glenn Mcrath injured in the 2nd test who had worked Tresco over and over again prior to that series

Cook is a different league to Tresco
Click to expand...

McGrath only missed 2 of the tests in 2005. And it was the attack that still had Warne, Lee and an albeit on the slide Gillespie.
 
essex boy said:
20 wickets in 5 tests is two wickets per innings.

40 runs a piece is 400 for the opposing team in every innings

:lol:
Click to expand...

Have you not always maintained that out and out fast bowlers "go for more runs because the ball comes off the bat quicker and to the boundary faster"?
 
Andy.SAFC said:
Have you not always maintained that out and out fast bowlers "go for more runs because the ball comes off the bat quicker and to the boundary faster"?
Click to expand...

indeed it does but the likes of Ambrose and Donald didnt go at 40 runs a piece

refer to my first post ' trescos technique wouldnt have stood up to the bowlings attacks of the 90s'

Lee is no more than a decent test bowler
 
Last edited:
essex boy said:
indeed it does but the likes of Ambrose and Donald didnt go at 40 runs a piece

refer to my first post ' trescos technique wouldnt have stood up to the bowlings attacks of the 90s'

Lee is no more than a decent test bowler
Click to expand...

Possibly not, his lack of footwork could have cost him against the very best bowlers. And while he scores stacks of runs at Taunton he is a lot more than a flat track bully.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top