englishman abroad
Striker
Did he actually watch the game?Marco on Geldhart the man's an embarrassment.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did he actually watch the game?Marco on Geldhart the man's an embarrassment.
Not a fan of Barnes I think he's dreadful.
He is like. Talks about boring stats that no one’s interested in when there’s exciting activity in the box! He infuriates me, ask our lass.Not a fan of Barnes I think he's dreadful.
So you think he’s done well so far?He said Geldhart was out of his depth.
Marco no longer lives in the area, not a good thing for a local pundit.
TBF you haven’t answered his question!Give him a chance.
FFS.
Slightly unfair KB, I was listening from 7.10 and he was explaining he’d like him to contribute more, runs, holding ball up but realised early days. He needs a goal to get his confidence going.He said Geldhart was out of his depth.
You're right...but most of those negative points are BECAUSE he lives outside the region (not attending games, not watching 90 minutes etc, etc). He is a good name, but that's all.His location may be a factor but the fact he rarely attends games, infrequently watches the full 90 minutes, bases his opinions on highlights and seems massively ill-informed are more significant IMHO. (These are facts admitted by him on air over the years he’s been on).
I don’t always agree with pundits, after all it is all about opinions but I would expect any pundit to at least have a decent appreciation of facts, figures and anecdotal information about the team they comment upon. He’s just not good enough.
You're right...but most of those negative points are BECAUSE he lives outside the region (not attending games, not watching 90 minutes etc, etc). He is a good name, but that's all.
To be delivering informed opinion the BBC should have an ex-player who has seen the action first hand.
In my view he's not dreadful; he does his research, conducts reasonable pre-match and post-match interviews ...but his commentary is average and not always the best at painting a picture of the game with his words. But, as a combination, the Barnes-Benno duo's biggest problem is their inability to keep stum when the other is talking. The listener is bombarded with unintelligible verbiage whenever there's a goal or dramatic incident because Benno is screaming over Barnes or vice versa.Not a fan of Barnes I think he's dreadful.
In my view he's not dreadful; he does his research, conducts reasonable pre-match and post-match interviews ...but his commentary is average and not always the best at painting a picture of the game with his words. But, as a combination, the Barnes-Benno duo's biggest problem is their inability to keep stum when the other is talking. The listener is bombarded with unintelligible verbiage whenever there's a goal or dramatic incident because Benno is screaming over Barnes or vice versa.
KB, who is normally a decent poster, clearly has an agenda against Marco….Slightly unfair KB, I was listening from 7.10 and he was explaining he’d like him to contribute more, runs, holding ball up but realised early days. He needs a goal to get his confidence going.
KB, who is normally a decent poster, clearly has an agenda against Marco….
I listened for a bit last night - marco was insisting it wasn’t a penalty and arguing with Barnes about itKB, who is normally a decent poster, clearly has an agenda against Marco….
No, but they do sit in a tv studio and watch the games live and so are able to pass comment ....... unfortunately most of those comments are shiteDo Shearer Lineker etc “live in the area” and “attend every game” to be pundits on Match of the Day et or are people saying they are shite too?????????