• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

The grass isn't always greener...

  • Thread starter Thread starter UTW
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
U

UTW

Guest
Birmingham sacking Rowett for Zola and now look like their play off push is off.

Newcastle forcing Robson out as they weren't happy with 5th place then going on to be a bottom half premier league/championship yoyo club.

What other examples can you think of where a club has pulled the trigger only to shoot themselves clean in the face?
 

Royal 8er said:
So ellis personally scouted and decided we would buy rodwell with no input from the manager?
Unbelievable the lies people will spout
Click to expand...

No but it does take a fool to look at a player who had been one of your best players that season and decide instead of buying him for £10m as a proven good player he would back the signing of a waste of space he had barely touched a ball for 2 years.
 
UTW said:
Birmingham sacking Rowett for Zola and now look like their play off push is off.

Newcastle forcing Robson out as they weren't happy with 5th place then going on to be a bottom half premier league/championship yoyo club.

What other examples can you think of where a club has pulled the trigger only to shoot themselves clean in the face?
Click to expand...
Well using that logic we shouldnt have sacked bruce, o'neill, pdc, poyet.
Dick walked ..thank god the midget sized moron.
Sam walked and we've suffered horribly since
 
This old argument about sticking with failing managers is utter tosh.

Nobody asks how much worse it might have got if the club stuck with the sacked manager.
 
Kenna said:
No but it does take a fool to look at a player who had been one of your best players that season and decide instead of buying him for £10m as a proven good player he would back the signing of a waste of space he had barely touched a ball for 2 years.
Click to expand...
So you suggest that shoet was responsible for signing rodwell?
You know that is utter claptrap.
Just about every owner leaves the recruitment of players to managers.
We are no different and you know it.
Besides read the threads at the time we signed rodwell.
Most saw it as a sign of intent ..young english talent etc.
10m was price assuming all extras ( league placings, england caps, appearances ).
You have an agenda against short and would blame him for global warming man.
 
Metro Man said:
This old argument about sticking with failing managers is utter tosh.

Nobody asks how much worse it might have got if the club stuck with the sacked manager.
Click to expand...

The two examples I gave were not failing managers. Quite the opposite and were replaced by failing managers
 
Royal 8er said:
So you suggest that shoet was responsible for signing rodwell?
You know that is utter claptrap.
Just about every owner leaves the recruitment of players to managers.
We are no different and you know it.
Besides read the threads at the time we signed rodwell.
Most saw it as a sign of intent ..young english talent etc.
10m was price assuming all extras ( league placings, england caps, appearances ).
You have an agenda against short and would blame him for global warming man.
Click to expand...

Or maybe he should have relised that this isn't the first time he is allowing the signing of a completely unknown talent player over someone who had already proven themselves here.
 
UTW said:
The two examples I gave were not failing managers. Quite the opposite and were replaced by failing managers
Click to expand...

OK, remove the word 'failing' then.....

This old argument about sticking with managers is utter tosh.

Nobody asks how much worse it might have got if the club stuck with the sacked manager.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top