• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Takeover News/Rumours

Status
Not open for further replies.

I popped me cherry and copped a ban for a month and it was only my second ever post on here :)

Though i was under moderation with being "new" and my choice of words toward SD were a bit strong considering i was being watched :)

May depend on if attack is too personal. I cant see the mods on here would cover the charlatans arses, but what do i know.
 
I don't really mind the banning last year.

I made it clear that day that I would be starting a thread questioning how much money the club was owed by SD and that my suspicion was that they had created conditions where some or all of that debt may be wiped. It was also clear that it was borderline impossible to be 100% accurate on it, even if in a holistic sense, it was largely correct that Donald was going to wipe debts.

In the end RTG were being intimidated by a very clear - but completely baseless - strategy from the club of pretending that they would sue anyone saying things about them that weren't 100% accurate (which of course, is nearly impossible).

With the Daily Mail, for example, they told us they'd sue them, focusing on 10% of the article they had wrong rather than the 90% that they had right. Needless to say, that went nowhere because it would have revealed the financial truth, which they were at the time trying to avoid us knowing.

So it's good that the Emperor's new clothes were revealed and that some of us got banned for saying it, maybe it has taught us a lesson not to believe the narrative of these people.
 
KittenMittens said:
I don't really mind the banning last year.

I made it clear that day that I would be starting a thread questioning how much money the club was owed by SD and that my suspicion was that they had created conditions where some or all of that debt may be wiped. It was also clear that it was borderline impossible to be 100% accurate on it, even if in a holistic sense, it was largely correct that Donald was going to wipe debts.

In the end RTG were being intimidated by a very clear - but completely baseless - strategy from the club of pretending that they would sue anyone saying things about them that weren't 100% accurate (which of course, is nearly impossible).

With the Daily Mail, for example, they told us they'd sue them, focusing on 10% of the article they had wrong rather than the 90% that they had right. Needless to say, that went nowhere because it would have revealed the financial truth, which they were at the time trying to avoid us knowing.

So it's good that the Emperor's new clothes were revealed and that some of us got banned for saying it, maybe it has taught us a lesson not to believe the narrative of these people.
Click to expand...
I know the board needs to protect itself and I know that our owners are a bunch of petty vindictive cünts who'd do our say anything for money. This makes all our positions outside they're circle targets for different things ... principley they've tried to control things most others club don't bother with, one such thing is is deliberately leaking shit , and its my belief they've even groomed a few friendly members of message boards to do theyre dirty work, including shopping those who voice decent. Speaking truth to power is always risky, even more so when they've lost the plot
 
Last edited:
KittenMittens said:
I don't really mind the banning last year.

I made it clear that day that I would be starting a thread questioning how much money the club was owed by SD and that my suspicion was that they had created conditions where some or all of that debt may be wiped. It was also clear that it was borderline impossible to be 100% accurate on it, even if in a holistic sense, it was largely correct that Donald was going to wipe debts.

In the end RTG were being intimidated by a very clear - but completely baseless - strategy from the club of pretending that they would sue anyone saying things about them that weren't 100% accurate (which of course, is nearly impossible).

With the Daily Mail, for example, they told us they'd sue them, focusing on 10% of the article they had wrong rather than the 90% that they had right. Needless to say, that went nowhere because it would have revealed the financial truth, which they were at the time trying to avoid us knowing.

So it's good that the Emperor's new clothes were revealed and that some of us got banned for saying it, maybe it has taught us a lesson not to believe the narrative of these people.
Click to expand...
This is spot on, well done @KittenMittens
 
KittenMittens said:
I don't really mind the banning last year.

I made it clear that day that I would be starting a thread questioning how much money the club was owed by SD and that my suspicion was that they had created conditions where some or all of that debt may be wiped. It was also clear that it was borderline impossible to be 100% accurate on it, even if in a holistic sense, it was largely correct that Donald was going to wipe debts.

In the end RTG were being intimidated by a very clear - but completely baseless - strategy from the club of pretending that they would sue anyone saying things about them that weren't 100% accurate (which of course, is nearly impossible).

With the Daily Mail, for example, they told us they'd sue them, focusing on 10% of the article they had wrong rather than the 90% that they had right. Needless to say, that went nowhere because it would have revealed the financial truth, which they were at the time trying to avoid us knowing.

So it's good that the Emperor's new clothes were revealed and that some of us got banned for saying it, maybe it has taught us a lesson not to believe the narrative of these people.
Click to expand...

Aye, Methven claimed in the infamous meeting that never was, that they had a couple of defamation cases going on. This also appears to have been yet another half truth/lie.
That was when the lads from RAWA and ALS really got our backs up when he started claiming only Sunderland and Newcastle fans give their owners grief!?
Or ‘the Sunderland disease’ to use his exact words.
 
Last edited:
Papa Smurf said:
That SD got somebody to do his dirty work, didn’t have the balls to sack Jack himself and then wouldn’t answer his phone when Jack tried calling him afterwards numerous times. The fact he sacked him as a smoke screen for the takeover falling through.
Click to expand...
At least it wasn't the bust up before the Pompey match or the fisticuffs at Wembley that I've heard. ;)
 
Ghandi Floss said:
Aye, Methven claimed in the infamous meeting that never was, that they had a couple of defamation cases going on. This also appears to have been yet another half truth/lie.
That was when the lads from RAWA and ALS really got our backs up when he started claiming only Sunderland and Newcastle fans give their owners grief!?
Or ‘the Sunderland disease’ to use his exact words.
Click to expand...

“The Sunderland disease” :rolleyes:, i despise him and want him nowhere near the club. I only hope they all fuck off as part of any takeover/share changes otherwise nothing changes.

cheeky bastard
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top