"Sunderland is not an attractive job due to their policies and strategies"

[rubberface]

Don Goodman..and he is spot on imo. He also says "i hear that when Jack Clarke goes, Sunderland believe his replacement is already at the club and they will be developing somebody" Nobody who we have brought in, is anywhere near as Clarke's replacement. If Goodman has been told the club believe we have his replacement already, then we are fucked. Also, he is correct about the calibre of Head Coach we may be able to attract under the set up.

 

[Fetch Fletch]

Oh I thought that was the job ad

 

[Safc88]

Its mundle imo

 

[Altidore Step Overs]

I mean tbf, if we use the money to invest in positions that DO need strengthening, then I don't massively have an issue (i.e. striker and DM).

That's a big if though...

 

[SAFC 2012]

Its mundle imo

Jesus Christ

 

[Bear]

As much as I liked BBD as a player he’s a bit of a breast

 

[Wearside Wanderer II]

Don Goodman..and he is spot on imo. He also says "i hear that when Jack Clarke goes, Sunderland believe his replacement is already at the club and they will be developing somebody" Nobody who we have brought in, is anywhere near as Clarke's replacement. If Goodman has been told the club believe we have his replacement already, then we are fucked. Also, he is correct about the calibre of Head Coach we may be able to attract under the set up.

He’s probably right but he hates safc so he can get fucked

 

[rubberface]

Its mundle imo

God help us if it is for next season. I like Mundle's enthusiasm but nowhere near a regular first team starter from what we have seen. Still raw imo.

 

[Thatheaderman]

Wouldn't surprise me. Same with Ballard if he goes.

 

[rubberface]

Wouldn't surprise me. Same with Ballard if he goes.

...only one way we will end up if it is so mate.

 

[Locke Lamora]

Don Goodman..and he is spot on imo. He also says "i hear that when Jack Clarke goes, Sunderland believe his replacement is already at the club and they will be developing somebody" Nobody who we have brought in, is anywhere near as Clarke's replacement. If Goodman has been told the club believe we have his replacement already, then we are fucked. Also, he is correct about the calibre of Head Coach we may be able to attract under the set up.

Rusyn, Mundle and Watson. I don't mind trying to develop these lads when Clarke goes but we have to buy a quality CDM and striker to balance the side. No t sure that's going to happen though.

 

[Safc88]

Wouldn't surprise me. Same with Ballard if he goes.

Yep

Mundle and seelt their replacements imo

 

[rey mysterio]

Baffling how some so called supporters refuse to believe KLD is the problem here.

An owner who genuinely wanted the club to succeed would have binned Speakshit off by now.

He is no longer interested and can GTF

 

[MarcoG]

I still think Rusyn was identified last Summer with the expectation that Clarke was going, then when he didn't it's a positive and Rusyn's got a year to get ready for it. Then to add to that they managed to get a deal for Mundle that was unexpected. That's two seven figure fees paid for two players that appear to primarily want to play off the left side so I'd personally be surprised if we buy another in the Summer.

Clarke was a lot better than people made him out to be in League One but he was definitely still raw, he was still getting labelled as inconsistent this time last year by some divvies. Just have to hope the likes of Mundle can get better with game time in the way that Clarke did.

 

[Coeus]

Who cares if it's attractive to Don Goodman?

 

[rubberface]

Rusyn, Mundle and Watson. I don't mind trying to develop these lads when Clarke goes but we have to buy a quality CDM and striker to balance the side. No t sure that's going to happen though.

...then you are going from one problem to another mate...from no striker to no first team ready regualr left winger. We need to get a first team ready made replacement in for Clarke AND to do that we need to spend ££ on quality IF we want promotion next season.

 

[ontap]

Don Goodman..and he is spot on imo. He also says "i hear that when Jack Clarke goes, Sunderland believe his replacement is already at the club and they will be developing somebody" Nobody who we have brought in, is anywhere near as Clarke's replacement. If Goodman has been told the club believe we have his replacement already, then we are fucked. Also, he is correct about the calibre of Head Coach we may be able to attract under the set up.

He’s probably right but he hates safc so he can get fucked

Is the correct answer

 

[rubberface]

Yep

Mundle and seelt their replacements imo

It's workable in a perfect footballing world..but the majority we have brought in as replacements as so raw, they just look like a fish out of water most of them in first team football.

 

[Fetch Fletch]

Jesus Christ

Horrifying isn’t it

 

[rubberface]

I still think Rusyn was identified last Summer with the expectation that Clarke was going, then when he didn't it's a positive and Rusyn's got a year to get ready for it. Then to add to that they managed to get a deal for Mundle that was unexpected. That's two seven figure fees paid for two players that appear to primarily want to play off the left side so I'd personally be surprised if we buy another in the Summer.

Clarke was a lot better than people made him out to be in League One but he was definitely still raw, he was still getting labelled as inconsistent this time last year by some divvies. Just have to hope the likes of Mundle can get better with game time in the way that Clarke did.

..agree about the reason Rusyn was bought in, we scouted him whilst he was playing left of a forward 3. Similar to Clarke's role..but we have NEVER played Rusyn there to see what he's like..even since Clarke has been out.