Suggest a healthy snack that's diet friendly
- Thread starter Dave Herbal
- Start date
- Status
Deleted User 11453
Striker
Hard-boiled eggs.
AlpineExile
Striker
Fresh or soaked in vinegar?
Deleted User 11453
Striker
I just boil them for 10 mins and hoy a bit of salt and pepper on them.
But they are easy to take to work if they are kept in the shells.
Another thing I do is keep some tins of tuna in my drawer at work for when I get hungry.
Teejay
Striker
Things that fill me up and stop me craving shite throughout the day:
porridge for breakfast
nuts and dried fruit mid-morning
coffee definitely suppresses hunger too - americano with skimmed milk and 1 sweetener
eggs, scrambled for lunch perhaps with some bacon with fat cut off
My problem is I can't suppress the craving for alcohol and snacks late evening - need to suss that one out.
porridge for breakfast
nuts and dried fruit mid-morning
coffee definitely suppresses hunger too - americano with skimmed milk and 1 sweetener
eggs, scrambled for lunch perhaps with some bacon with fat cut off
My problem is I can't suppress the craving for alcohol and snacks late evening - need to suss that one out.
A
ayesane
Guest
Tomatoes and grapefruit, both negative calories, both delicious.
Are there any other magic foods?
A
ayesane
Guest
mushrooms?
negative calories my arse
A
ayesane
Guest
I've seen your arse.
It takes more calories to digest said sustenance then you gain via consumption.
Sounds like nonsense to me. Got any links?
A
ayesane
Guest
I read it in some diet pamphlet, you burn n calories per x grams of food and the calories:weight ratio of some low calorie veg/fruit will yield more calories burned then consumed on the average metabolism.. under 20 kcal in a medium tomato.
fuck knaa's though, surely it's a better lie to live by then most other diet claims on foods, like nuts and dried fruits
..fair enough, that puts that to bed then.
I read it in some diet pamphlet, you burn n calories per x grams of food and the calories:weight ratio of some low calorie veg/fruit will yield more calories burned then consumed on the average metabolism.. under 20 kcal in a medium tomato.
fuck knaa's though, surely it's a better lie to live by then most other diet claims on foods, like nuts and dried fruits
It just sounds so implausible though especially from an evolutionary point of view. It would be so inefficient to need so much energy to digest things. If you want negative calories then cold water or ice are your best bet but even heating them up hardly burns anything.
- Status
