• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Strauss and his stupid ideas....


Embarrassed for you

One of those jokers who used to call him “head boy” no doubt
It’s ridiculous that people can’t simply disagree with Strauss proposals and say soo, while at the same time fully respect what he has achieved and earned respect in his career.

Instead lower themselves to calling him petty childish names but then again I am not surprised.
 
It’s ridiculous that people can’t simply disagree with Strauss proposals and say soo, while at the same time fully respect what he has achieved and earned respect in his career.

Instead lower themselves to calling him petty childish names but then again I am not surprised.

Exactly

That’s what’s annoying me, blokes done so much for English cricket yet gets this stuff. Fair play to him for trying to do something for the game again. Like he always has, people won’t agree, I don’t agree with the majority of it, but everyone’s hate for the 100 being used for personal attacks on one of englands very best. Poor.
 
Players get well paid for their job. A county cricket contract pays a damn sight more than your average worker but they still want more rest. Imagine if a factory worker asked his/her boss for a rest. They'd end up getting a longer rest than they expected. A permanent one.

If cricketers are tired with too much cricket they should pack it in and try getting a job in the real world.
Only the few elite players get incredible money and not for very long. The vast majority of county players have modest salaries and only for a very short career. Once their contract/career is over their income falls off a cliff and they effectively have to start from scratch. They all join the “real world” eventually but your remark is brainless because if they all did what you suggest there would be no professional cricket and we’d all have nothing to watch except club cricket on a Saturday. Great idea!
 
It’s ridiculous that people can’t simply disagree with Strauss proposals and say soo, while at the same time fully respect what he has achieved and earned respect in his career.

Instead lower themselves to calling him petty childish names but then again I am not surprised.
Most people haven't, most people have stuck to his findings.

I've call him out for being an ECB employee and delivering a ridiculous report that is exactly what the ECB wanted.

I expect nothing better from him or them. But I am getting increasingly annoyed at people who would call themselves crickets fans, but are just shrugging their shoulders and accepting the death of the domestic game.
 
Only the few elite players get incredible money and not for very long. The vast majority of county players have modest salaries and only for a very short career. Once their contract/career is over their income falls off a cliff and they effectively have to start from scratch. They all join the “real world” eventually but your remark is brainless because if they all did what you suggest there would be no professional cricket and we’d all have nothing to watch except club cricket on a Saturday. Great idea!

There will always be cricketers. I'm talking about the ones who moan about playing too much cricket.

As for watching club cricket on a Saturday - what's wrong with that? I often go and watch it. I was watching Jonny Bushnell this season before he made his FC debut for Durham.
 
Only the few elite players get incredible money and not for very long. The vast majority of county players have modest salaries and only for a very short career. Once their contract/career is over their income falls off a cliff and they effectively have to start from scratch. They all join the “real world” eventually but your remark is brainless because if they all did what you suggest there would be no professional cricket and we’d all have nothing to watch except club cricket on a Saturday. Great idea!

Imagine the impact that money would have on someone like Ben Raine, its life changing.
 
Looking at it again, how are none test hosts meant to make ends meet when ODIs are going to be in unpredictable and cooler September, with everyone back at work. 50 over games in April which is renowned for rain showers, and people at work etc. And a month with no real income in the height of summer
 
They have no chance of getting through because of the August issue, no FC cricket

if the idea is festival cricket with derbies or whatever then it needs more detail of what it entails and the money can bring it

the 50 over stuff while the 100 is on just about works for me, as its quite a lot of days cricket, just make the pitches as flat as possible to get the most play in.

some of it isnt a great standard but at least its actual cricket, why not get the minor counties in that or someit and make it really interesting.

I am not sure you can play proper CC cricket or Blast cricket when the 100 is on.
 
Most people haven't, most people have stuck to his findings.

I've call him out for being an ECB employee and delivering a ridiculous report that is exactly what the ECB wanted.

I expect nothing better from him or them. But I am getting increasingly annoyed at people who would call themselves crickets fans, but are just shrugging their shoulders and accepting the death of the domestic game.
Some have though and should be embarrassed, the respect Strauss has is fully deserved.

And he simply deserves better than ridiculous name calling that some posters (not you) have called him, I am sure of it.

He has been given a very difficult task due to the mistake of having two short format competitions in the calendar.

I for one have sympathy for him trying to find room when there isn’t room.
 
Last edited:
Most people haven't, most people have stuck to his findings.

I've call him out for being an ECB employee and delivering a ridiculous report that is exactly what the ECB wanted.

I expect nothing better from him or them. But I am getting increasingly annoyed at people who would call themselves crickets fans, but are just shrugging their shoulders and accepting the death of the domestic game.

He didnt make the 100, he didnt put the 100 in August for the next 5 years and tie it to a broadcasting deal

thats done

he cant do anything about that.

what be the point of producing areport saying "get rid of the 100" when it cant be done at the minute.

Just for good PR with cricket fans?

How trying to find some workable solutions for this current mess, at least he is trying.

His report isnt even that controversial in the slightest, compared to what some feared.
 
Some have though and should be embarrassed, the respect Strauss has is fully deserved.

And he simply deserves better than ridiculous name calling that some posters (not you) have called him, I am sure of it.

He has been given a very difficult task due to the mistake of having two short format competitions in the calendar.

I for one have sympathy for him trying to find room when there isn’t room.
Most haven't, but that seems to be the bit you're focusing on. Is it because there's no defending the report?

He had a very easy task, and he delivered exactly what was required.

If this had really been a proper review, that's a different story. That's an impossible task.
 
He didnt make the 100, he didnt put the 100 in August for the next 5 years and tie it to a broadcasting deal

thats done

he cant do anything about that.

what be the point of producing areport saying "get rid of the 100" when it cant be done at the minute.

Just for good PR with cricket fans?

How trying to find some workable solutions for this current mess, at least he is trying.

His report isnt even that controversial in the slightest, compared to what some feared.
The common sense view is under the remit he has, he has simply tried to fit everything in.

If anything he is trying too hard to please everyone with this friendly idea, don’t think that will work.
 
He didnt make the 100, he didnt put the 100 in August for the next 5 years and tie it to a broadcasting deal

thats done

he cant do anything about that.

what be the point of producing areport saying "get rid of the 100" when it cant be done at the minute.

Just for good PR with cricket fans?

How trying to find some workable solutions for this current mess, at least he is trying.

His report isnt even that controversial in the slightest, compared to what some feared.
Nobody has once said that Strauss scheduled the 16.4, why do you keep repeating it?

He can't, the ECB can.

Because it was supposed to a review into the domestic game.

Yes it can.

If the 16.4 is off the table there's no point in this farce, we'll always have the same problems.

You can shrug your shoulders and present your belly for tickling if you like, I'm happy to call out his bullshit report.
 
The common sense view is under the remit he has, he has simply tried to fit everything in.

If anything he is trying too hard to please everyone with this friendly idea, don’t think that will work.

the point being, the 100 is tied in for next few years, that isn't changing, no problem with people voicing their displeasure over it like, as I hate the tournament.

However, you need to find the best of the situation after that, not just stamp your feet and say get rid of 100....we need some practical solutions.
Nobody has once said that Strauss scheduled the 16.4, why do you keep repeating it?

He can't, the ECB can.

Because it was supposed to a review into the domestic game.

Yes it can.

If the 16.4 is off the table there's no point in this farce, we'll always have the same problems.

You can shrug your shoulders and present your belly for tickling if you like, I'm happy to call out his bullshit report.

You just dont get it do you

the 100 is tied in, it cant be removed at the minute

so whats your solution to schedule in the mean time? do nothing?

no point, so you were happy with the schedule this season then? :eek:
 
the point being, the 100 is tied in for next few years, that isn't changing, no problem with people voicing their displeasure over it like, as I hate the tournament.

However, you need to find the best of the situation after that, not just stamp your feet and say get rid of 100....we need some practical solutions.


You just dont get it do you

the 100 is tied in, it cant be removed at the minute

so whats your solution to schedule in the mean time? do nothing?

no point, so you were happy with the schedule this season then? :eek:
Yes it can. At the stroke of a pen.

Now you can keep repeating the same shit over and over again and getting more and more aggressive, as you do, but you'll still be wrong.

Now put your stupid straw man and emojis away.
 
Most haven't, but that seems to be the bit you're focusing on. Is it because there's no defending the report?

He had a very easy task, and he delivered exactly what was required.

If this had really been a proper review, that's a different story. That's an impossible task.
As I said a lot of the times I believe a short format tournament just one should be in the school holidays.

I like the idea of a proper window with the focus just on that similar to the IPL but would be better T20 than the hundred.

The idea that kids are going to get of their PlayStation to go along to a county championship game in the school holidays to talk about players knowing where their off stump is and what is a good leave!! I find ludicrous.

But they might just enjoy a fast paced colorful tournament in the school holidays.

Moving the county championship to more summer months and not in April is a good thing but not person has mentioned it.

The problem is and always has been trying to keep everyone happy, we don’t need two short format competitions!

No other country does that, but we do need one short competition in peak time with all the best players available.
 
Yes it can. At the stroke of a pen.

Now you can keep repeating the same shit over and over again and getting more and more aggressive, as you do, but you'll still be wrong.

Now put your stupid straw man and emojis away.

It cant, its tied to the broadcasting deal.

I am not getting agressive at all, you are not offering any solutions, just moaning at strauss for something he didnt cause or can do anything about.

The 100 isnt going away, so whats your solution to the schedule issue?

come up with some, instead of slagging off someone who is at least trying.
 
Embarrassed for you

Ah well, no point two of us being embarrassed then.

You enjoy playing the contrarian for the sake of it. Nice to see you’ve gained the support of one of the dimmest posters on the subforum like. That’s about the standard.
It’s ridiculous that people can’t simply disagree with Strauss proposals and say soo

Have you just landed from a different planet?! :lol:

What the f*ck do you think people have been doing for about 8 months?! :lol:
 
Ah well, no point two of us being embarrassed then.

You enjoy playing the contrarian for the sake of it. Nice to see you’ve gained the support of one of the dimmest posters on the subforum like. That’s about the standard.

I am not playing contrarian at all, you just keep saying the same thing over and over again it is really helpful.

fact you have resorted to so much name calling tells me you arent willing to seriously discuss cricket matters, which is a shame.

I dont want the 100, the fact you think thats contrarian tells me you dont know the definition of the word.
 
Back
Top