• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Southampton spying compendium thread


Wearside4eva said:
If something is against the rules, how is there no punishment detailing what an infraction of that rule would result in?
The Smoggies think Southampton should be booted out because that suits them.
But if there is no direct punishment already in place, why should that be the result?
May as well fine the Saints and promote Hull.
I really don’t understand why Boro played Southampton anyway. They should surely have lodged a complaint when the alleged breach happened and let the EFL deal with it there and then.
Click to expand...
There isn’t a punishment as each case needs looking at as individual breaches. Financial breaches are easy you just say 1 point per £5m overspend but you can’t have the same punishment for 1 bloke taking notes over if he had videos, live streaming it back to other analysts who then broke it all down and could prepare against specific tactics. Even financial breaches have a full investigation and then can be given different punishments there’s no real crime/law break that has the same punishment each time.
danthemanSAFC said:
I don't understand why they announced on Thursday that there'll be a meeting on Tuesday. Why wait 6 days when time is precious in this scenario. Surely they've got nothing else to do seen as though we're at the end of the season now. Typical EFL!
Click to expand...
It’s an independent panel isn’t it? If so you need to get people who half understand the laws of the game, those people aren’t just sitting at home watching the horse racing or this morning waiting for a call. It’s one of the reasons the Man City case has taken so long.
 
Last edited:
danthemanSAFC said:
I don't understand why they announced on Thursday that there'll be a meeting on Tuesday. Why wait 6 days when time is precious in this scenario. Surely they've got nothing else to do seen as though we're at the end of the season now. Typical EFL!
Click to expand...
Last week they said that a decision would be made by today at the latest or sooner if possible. That suggested to me that that inquiry board have been looking at it for a few days and the plan wasn't just to leave it until today before they met.
 
Lord Potts said:
Last week they said that a decision would be made by today at the latest or sooner if possible. That suggested to me that that inquiry board have been looking at it for a few days and the plan wasn't just to leave it until today before they met.
Click to expand...
I can tell you, from personal experience, if I say "something will be ready by Day X, or possibly before", then the earliest possible point it'll be ready is Day X.

More likely it'll be Day X + 2 Days
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top