• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Simon Adingra 🇨🇮 Signed!

Watson wanted to go.
But it does seem a bit short sighted by us, why didn't they come to some sort of swap agreement?

Feels like Brighton got the better deal, money for a player who underperformed last season and a young Englishman who is the best prospect I have seen play in our youths since Hendonson.
 

But it does seem a bit short sighted by us, why didn't they come to some sort of swap agreement?

Feels like Brighton got the better deal, money for a player who underperformed last season and a young Englishman who is the best prospect I have seen play in our youths since Hendonson.
We tried to come to a swap agreement and he didn’t want to play in the championship
 
So let's gets this straight, Brighton pay Sunderland 10 million for Watson to improve their team, but we pay Brighton 20.5 million for Brighton's Adingra who must be surplus to requirements.
May as well of kept Watson and saved 10.5 million quid.
They've bought Watson to develop and (probably) sell on at a profit later. We needed a more experienced player for the upcoming battle for survival.
 
But it does seem a bit short sighted by us, why didn't they come to some sort of swap agreement?

Feels like Brighton got the better deal, money for a player who underperformed last season and a young Englishman who is the best prospect I have seen play in our youths since Hendonson.
I agree on the face of it we’ve got the worse deal here

But if you factor in Watson wanted to leave and Adingra didn’t want to play championship it changes matters
 
So let's gets this straight, Brighton pay Sunderland 10 million for Watson to improve their team, but we pay Brighton 20.5 million for Brighton's Adingra who must be surplus to requirements.
May as well of kept Watson and saved 10.5 million quid.
Because adingra is at an age where he needs games and isn’t prepared to be second fiddle to Miltoma where Watson will be happy with minutes from the bench it’s not rocket science
 
But it does seem a bit short sighted by us, why didn't they come to some sort of swap agreement?

Feels like Brighton got the better deal, money for a player who underperformed last season and a young Englishman who is the best prospect I have seen play in our youths since Hendonson.
I personally would've kept Watson over this lad. I admit I've not seen him play but Watson is 4 years younger, an excellent prospect who's proven he can handle the big stage, British (which seems to carry an inflated transfer wage) and already integrated into the team. Be delighted to be proved wrong though.
 
I personally would've kept Watson over this lad. I admit I've not seen him play but Watson is 4 years younger, an excellent prospect who's proven he can handle the big stage, British (which seems to carry an inflated transfer wage) and already integrated into the team. Be delighted to be proved wrong though.
😂
 
I personally would've kept Watson over this lad. I admit I've not seen him play but Watson is 4 years younger, an excellent prospect who's proven he can handle the big stage, British (which seems to carry an inflated transfer wage) and already integrated into the team. Be delighted to be proved wrong though.
We could have kept him manacled in the club shop, charged kids £1 a time to look at him.
 
Back
Top