• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Sadiki to Chelsea (internet chat)


Boinger said:
That's the sad reality of being successful for you, the so called "bigger boys" coming in for your players.
Click to expand...
It’s football now, who you sell too and who you buy off is dictated by where you sit in the league system mainly.

Only the really top teams (Madrid, city for example) avoid it, look at Chelsea, fighting for champs league and if Madrid are interested Fernandez would be sold/off in a flash
 
REDM1ST said:
“Teams” you’re talking shite and I’m not your mate, So we got an inflated fee for the Bellingham name and spent that money on Xhaka mukihelie < spelling? And money left over (in the bank) seeing the model now?? No thought not..
Click to expand...
You are either stupid or refusing to read what i'm saying. I understand how it works.

But you want to sell sadiki and roefs for £55m combined, simply because its 100% profit. :lol::lol:

They are more than double your money players. They are triple your money or more footballers.
 
Chelsea would be a shocker for him. Look at all the young players that have gone there and been allowed to sit and rot.
 
Mowgli said:
Of course we can find a replacement. But that doesn't mean you sell him for £20m, just because its 100% profit... when hes worth double that easily to give even more money to reinvest and improve.

I can't get my head around the nonsense you're peddling. Nobody is saying don't sell, but you're selling for ridiculously low prices.
Click to expand...


You can’t grasp that we sell for maximum value profit and reinvest?? The 100% you’re spouting was a example in layman’s terminology, if we as a club x3 x6 x3000% in your words what we got for Ross steward (massively inflated) get a return on investment it’s only going one way….. ⬆️
 
REDM1ST said:
You can’t grasp that we sell for maximum value profit and reinvest?? The 100% you’re spouting was a example in layman’s terminology, if we as a club x3 x6 x3000% in your words what we got for Ross steward (massively inflated) get a return on investment it’s only going one way….. ⬆️
Click to expand...
Of course we sell for maximum value :lol: I've never once said don't sell.

But in no way is Sadiki's maximum value £34m or Roefs £20m.

You are incapable of listening, reading and thinking.
 
Last edited:
Mowgli said:
You are either stupid or refusing to read what i'm saying. I understand how it works.

But you want to sell sadiki and roefs for £55m combined, simply because its 100% profit. :lol::lol:

They are more than double your money players. They are triple your money or more footballers.
Click to expand...



There’s only one person not getting the gist.. and I’ll refrain from calling you stupid
 
Mowgli said:
Of course we can find a replacement. But that doesn't mean you sell him for £20m, just because its 100% profit... when hes worth double that easily to give even more money to reinvest and improve.

I can't get my head around the nonsense you're peddling. Nobody is saying don't sell, but you're selling for ridiculously low prices.
Click to expand...
This
 
Mowgli said:
You are either stupid or refusing to read what i'm saying. I understand how it works.

But you want to sell sadiki and roefs for £55m combined, simply because its 100% profit. :lol::lol:

They are more than double your money players. They are triple your money or more footballers.
Click to expand...


It doesn’t reach a threshold where we sell for profit only and I’ve never said I want to sell anyone because it’s “100%” profit it was only a example that some slightly lessers might find it hard to differentiate between. Enjoy your mash
 
As much as I like sadiki I think id be far more gutted if one of Ballard, Mukiele, xhaka or le fee left possibly even brobbey because I think he’d be the hardest to replace.

Hes a good little player sadiki but as it stands teams would be paying for potential and being realistic if he hits the heights expected he won’t be playing here anyway

I’d throw the toys right out the pram is xhaka or Ballard left
 
REDM1ST said:
It’s madness to think that the club and model that we are currently running would turn down a offer around £35m.

We paid around £15m , £17m with add ons which will not have been activated, So considering the figures it’s over 100% profit on one player in less than one season,

That is The Model
Click to expand...
The lad has proven himself to be more than capable in the premier league we will hold out for a much higher return if he actually does leave this season.
 
SAFC 2012 said:
As much as I like sadiki I think id be far more gutted if one of Ballard, Mukiele, xhaka or le fee left possibly even brobbey because I think he’d be the hardest to replace.

Hes a good little player sadiki but as it stands teams would be paying for potential and being realistic if he hits the heights expected he won’t be playing here anyway

I’d throw the toys right out the pram is xhaka or Ballard left
Click to expand...

Same. Though I think there’s little to no chance of that. I think for the younger ones we have bought will have been on the promise not to stand in their way should a big team come in for them.
 
Mowgli said:
Of course we sell for maximum value :lol: I've never once said don't sell.

But in no way is Sadiki's maximum value £34m or Roefs £20m.

You are incapable of listening, reading and thinking.
Click to expand...


Who said it was their max valuation idiot, not me!! Are you doing the 100% maths again and trying to pass it off as a rule we must follow…. I’ll still refrain from calling you stupid
 
Mackemansj1 said:
Look at forest or the mags, mags even more so. Went from cup winners, champions league. They fucked about all window trying to keep the rat then panic bought and now look miles away with every so called better player wanting out in the summer.
Click to expand...
The difference being between us and the mags is we have a very well structured recruitment team in place as we have identified this is the area that is most important when it comes to being competitive whilst retaining sustainability.
 
Kev75 said:
The lad has proven himself to be more than capable in the premier league we will hold out for a much higher return if he actually does leave this season.
Click to expand...


Wholly agree with this statement but if the club have identified a replacement for around the same money or above and make a profit from the deal that’s what we need to do as a club
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top