Surely this vast area of pressure must create denser atmospheric stacking, the thing that blocks our light at distance so at a low tide because of this pressure wave pushing down on the sea we should be able to see a much shorter distance out to see.
Any higher pressure will always be the result of more condensed stacking. Basically more molecules per layer than the one above and so on and so on and so on.
Never will two layers be identical.
Bearing in mind climbing 50 foot high enables us to see further out to sea because of less dense layers according to you?
Yes, because you are looking through less dense stacked layers as you gain elevation.
Hold on most of the gradient is inaccessible as in the projector area but most of it is also under the sea?
Very little of it is above water compared to what's below it.
So the bit that we all live in is flat?
Not all, no.
I'm on about the total landmass including continents and under the sea you know?
And I told you how they sit in the seas bu8t you chose to overlook it.
surely by getting to the point just before it's too cold for man or machine one could circumnavigate the area and get an estimate of the area.
Let's say you hit an ice ring after the land and you circumnavigate that. It means you've gone all around that ring, only.
What is beyond it may offer you so much trek before you basically can't go farther. In or outward.
that's what i'd do if I was a flat earther who needs first had knowledge for facts
It's so easily said. I mean you can offer to fly me into your space and land me on one of your planets. But is this going to happen?
The argument is flawed to hell.
Also so how do you know there is a gradient if its under the sea and inaccessible?
The oceans to landmass offer us that.
If your whole premise is built on flat seas and landmasses what brought you to the conclusion there even is a gradient.
It's pretty clear.
Just go walking on the beach and follow the tide out.
Then turn around and see how far you walked down a gradient.
There's the simplest form.
Have you been under the sea to check it?
Yes.
Ok, imagining that, what now?
Decide whether you believe it or not..
Only because you fail to understand how the actual geometry destroys your projector/dome story
I'm sure you want to tell me, right?
Synch up as in following the same regular pattern. Surely if the reflected energy moving over and around caused the tides, they'd do so at the same time every time the sun passed over and around. No?
Not at all.
Only in the locality. The rest would be dissipated.
So lakes and reservoirs are now tidal? You sure about that?
I never said anything about lakes and reservoirs being tidal.
You take one step forward and one back if it suits you. I'm ok with it.
He who walks past his sandals barefoot and stubs his toe cannot blame Santa Claus for not making him wear sandals.
Correct.
Or something.
Jump off a cliff.
Or something.
I did find this I drew that you originally said reflected your underwater gradient under the sea as a cross section of your world then changed your mind because of sea depths.
No, you changed it to suit your ways, not me.
Just trying to work out how shallow a gradient YOU think it is? Just very roughly?
I'm sure you'll make up some of your own, as you did before.
What was it, 1000 or 1000s of miles high and whatnot?
This was nearly exactly 1 year ago actually, happy anniversary Nukey.
You must be logged on to see external links


Happy anniversary to you leggy.
But lets be clear, this pressure wave of which you speak that is strong enough to cause pressure on the oceans to push a tide, can not be detected by any known means?
Out at sea, yes.
Inland you would get minor variations due to tide displacement of the local atmosphere which would register on barometers, which would and does get passed off as simply atmospheric variations due to weather change, which is true.
For example I live half a mile from the sea, it is low tide at the moment and the difference between high tide and low tide today is about 4 meters. Yet none of my pressure meters have ever detected this pressure wave strong enough to displace 4 meters of coastal water. Why is that?
You're talking about a moving tide. There will be pressure variations but they will be a minor build.
If you look at a tide you'll notice it gains over many hours, not just one immediate water metre change in an instance.