Put a flat earthier into space

[Nukehasslefan]

No, you really can't. If a ship is 100 miles out to sea and you're standing on the beach, you're not going to be able to see it even with the most powerful "scope" on Earth.

Yep but then again we're only talking a few miles, not 100.
Aren't scopes amazing though? To see lights in the sky that are said to be 4000 trillion and up to 16,000 trillion miles away and that's just with the naked eye and the scopes that can let us see way more miles.
I'm sitting laughing like hell here at how those at the top have taken the absolute pee out of us all.

Anyway back to the ships.
A few miles for the naked eye and they disappear due to what I explained.

What they don't do is sail down a curve t.

Either way, the Earth absolutely is an oblate spheroid and you're very wrong to suggest you have any evidence whatsoever to the contrary.

No matter which way you want to look at it or spin it, the Earth is absolutely not a spinning globe, unless you have some proof that you're holding back. I've yet to see any.

Someone better call Australia and let them know they don't exist.

There's no argument from me about Australia existing. the argument is, it's not where we're told.

 

[legend7]

Yep but then again we're only talking a few miles, not 100.
Aren't scopes amazing though? To see lights in the sky that are said to be 4000 trillion and up to 16,000 trillion miles away and that's just with the naked eye and the scopes that can let us see way more miles.
I'm sitting laughing like hell here at how those at the top have taken the absolute pee out of us all.

Anyway back to the ships.
A few miles for the naked eye and they disappear due to what I explained.

What they don't do is sail down a curve t.

No matter which way you want to look at it or spin it, the Earth is absolutely not a spinning globe, unless you have some proof that you're holding back. I've yet to see any.

Tbh you've pretty much proved our point, we can see things many miles away in the sky with our naked eye, yet when things go so far on land or sea they vanish, odd that isn't it

There's no argument from me about Australia existing. the argument is, it's not where we're told.

Yet you can't mark on where it is, well you thought you could, 11 and 7 but that went well didn't it.......

 

[Nukehasslefan]

I'm not, are you absolutely dumb or can't read?

Why do you need to ask that when you've spent long enough with others knowing I'm dumb, stupid and an imbecile, to name but a few?
Why ask?

I'm offering distances not from a map but of travelled routes or highways which you agreed would be correct.

You're offering distances of highways?
Offer them and I'll accept.
But it may help if you understand what I'm saying.

So come on then how far do you now think south africa is away from the UK if its not the 3500 miles you said you placed it at?

Not too sure. I'd need to go in-depth to actually throw all the landmass around. It wouldn't be a 10-minute job and it would not look anything like the map you use.

I said roughly for the gradient not exactly, very roughly will do, in fact very very roughly?

What do you think very roughly is compared to a potential Earth size of potentially well over 50,000 miles circumference?

You do know everything about the real world and exactly how veey intricate reflections work so you must have a very basic idea of the gradient?.

I know enough of my musing that suits me.
You are trying to get snippets from it and decide to offer a world that suits you by taking snippets and doing nothing much with them.

Really lost the plot in the last couple of days.
Just outright denial, rejection and wilful ignorance lately. Not even trying to discuss anything anymore.

What goes around comes around.

Tbh you've pretty much proved our point, we can see things many miles away in the sky with our naked eye, yet when things go so far on land or sea they vanish, odd that isn't it

Of course, it's odd. For people to believe we can see lights 16,000 trillion miles into the sky, is odd as hell but that's not the fault of those who believe that. That's the fault of the sci-fi story tellers.

Yet you can't mark on where it is, well you thought you could, 11 and 7 but that went well didn't it.......

Then you have no need to go any further, right?

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

I know more about this Earth than you do.

Pretty much every one of your posts on this thread says otherwise.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Pretty much every one of your posts on this thread says otherwise.

That's where we'll beg to differ.

 

[legend7]

Why do you need to ask that when you've spent long enough with others knowing I'm dumb, stupid and an imbecile, to name but a few?
Why ask?

You're offering distances of highways?
Offer them and I'll accept.
But it may help if you understand what I'm saying.

Not too sure. I'd need to go in-depth to actually throw all the landmass around. It wouldn't be a 10-minute job and it would not look anything like the map you use.

What do you think very roughly is compared to a potential Earth size of potentially well over 50,000 miles circumference?

I know enough of my musing that suits me.
You are trying to get snippets from it and decide to offer a world that suits you by taking snippets and doing nothing much with them.

What goes around comes around.

I gave you a link to some very long African highways.
You need to go in depth to know the distance from the UK to south africa, OK go deep, say half hour, why does it take so long I thought you knew all about your world?
How would I know the gradient it's your world, just roughly so it resembles a lemon squeezer as you say?
Which countries have you travelled to in the world out of interest?

.

Not too sure. I'd need to go in-depth to actually throw all the landmass around. It wouldn't be a 10-minute job and it would not look anything like the map you use.

Also once again we don't want the map we see we want your map

 

[Hend79]

You don't have any proof for s spinning globe. None at all no matter how much you say you have.
If you think you definitely have then show me your proof. That's all I'm asking for.


I've given plenty of snippets but naturally, they're waved away as I would expect.

You don't, you're just following the narrative and I understand that.

You have given no evidence whatsoever you absolute liar. You have admitted you have no evidence or proof in earlier posts and that your thoughts are just "musings". So stop lying you absolute

 

[Nukehasslefan]

I gave you a link to some very long African highways.

I'm not arguing with them.

You need to go in depth to know the distance from the UK to south africa, OK go deep, say half hour, why does it take so long I thought you knew all about your world?

You don't get to choose.
And if I go in depth I have to do the full map of known major landmasses.

How would I know the gradient it's your world, just roughly so it resembles a lemon squeezer as you say?

And you took it as some kind of 1000 miles high mountain with countries angling down the sides, so there's no point in me going anywhere with that.

Which countries have you travelled to in the world out of interest?

Enough and it doesn't matter one iota which I've traveled.

You have given no evidence whatsoever you absolute liar. You have admitted you have no evidence or proof in earlier posts and that your thoughts are just "musings". So stop lying you absolute

Kicking from between the back legs of others does not offer you any credence in the crowd and it also does not offer you any compensation for the damage to your sandal.

 

[DPTT]

Still not one single demonstration from @Nukehasslefan to prove the earth is not a globe

 

[legend7]

I'm not arguing with them.

You don't get to choose.
And if I go in depth I have to do the full map of known major landmasses.

And you took it as some kind of 1000 miles high mountain with countries angling down the sides, so there's no point in me going anywhere with that.

Enough and it doesn't matter one iota which I've traveled.

OK so the highways are correct, can't wait for map mk2, say by the weekend? If that's OK?
I didn't take it as any height that's why I'm asking you, I'm interested, so rough gradient or roughly how many miles in height difference from the lowest part of the bowl area to where you reach the edge of the "north pole" uninhabitable area.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Still not one single demonstration from @Nukehasslefan to prove the earth is not a globe

The simplest demonstration of all and anyone can do it but many will choose not to or will choose to believe water curves around a ball rather than conforming to the container it is in and laying surface level.

It's up to those who want to use layman's logic.

OK so the highways are correct, can't wait for map mk2, say by the weekend? If that's OK?

I'll decide.

I didn't take it as any height that's why I'm asking you, I'm interested,

You are interested. I'd say one of the most interested, otherwise you wouldn't be so keen.

so rough gradient or roughly how many miles in height difference from the lowest part of the bowl area to where you reach the edge of the "north pole" uninhabitable area.

I can give you a rough estimate. Not yet though.

 

[Hend79]

I know more about this Earth than you do.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

35?

 

[Hend79]

I'm not arguing with them.

You don't get to choose.
And if I go in depth I have to do the full map of known major landmasses.

And you took it as some kind of 1000 miles high mountain with countries angling down the sides, so there's no point in me going anywhere with that.

Enough and it doesn't matter one iota which I've traveled.

Kicking from between the back legs of others does not offer you any credence in the crowd and it also does not offer you any compensation for the damage to your sandal.

Any proof of a magical dome light show yet liar?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Any proof of a magical dome light show yet liar?

2?

 

[Hend79]

35?

There is the biggest shock so far, you can count that high

2?

Yet more deflection

 

[DPTT]

The simplest demonstration of all and anyone can do it but many will choose not to or will choose to believe water curves around a ball rather than conforming to the container it is in and laying surface level.

It's up to those who want to use layman's logic.

I'll decide.

You are interested. I'd say one of the most interested, otherwise you wouldn't be so keen.

I can give you a rough estimate. Not yet though.

Then tell us how you do it then

What equipment?
Roughly how much water?
Size of the container?
How many times did you repeat the experiment to come to your 100% conclusion the earth is not a globe?
Who else has repeated your experiments and agreed with your results?

 

[legend7]

You are interested. I'd say one of the most interested, otherwise you wouldn't be so keen.

I can give you a rough estimate. Not yet though.

Why not now if its a rough estimate, thought you'd know it with your vast understanding of the cell world we live in, OK I'll let you think on it a while if you can let me know asap though

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Why not now if its a rough estimate, thought you'd know it with your vast understanding of the cell world we live in, OK I'll let you think on it a while if you can let me know asap though

I'll let you know one day.
I wouldn't put a time limit on it if I were you.

 

[legend7]

I'll let you know one day.
I wouldn't put a time limit on it if I were you.

Why though if you understand and know about it?
For example what led you to think it's like the lemon squeezer map rather than flat, and if something pushed you in that direction you must have an idea of height or gradient.
You seem to know a lot about intricate superfluid reactions on a dome you can't possibly have been to, I thought a rough gradient or slope would be one of the more basic discoveries you have made in your quest for truth.
Guess science works in strange ways.
Or is that strangeways