• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space


So how can we make the known distances between cities work on a 2d world?
Just put the landmass positions to fit the distances offered.
Basically, just cut the globe and spread it out then bring it into a circle to leave the so-called antarctic as the outer gradient to the dome as a foundation.
 
Just put the landmass positions to fit the distances offered.
Basically, just cut the globe and spread it out then bring it into a circle to leave the so-called antarctic as the outer gradient to the dome as a foundation.
You say that as if it’s a piece of piss but you know that’s impossible hence why you walked away from it the other day
 
Just put the landmass positions to fit the distances offered.
Basically, just cut the globe and spread it out then bring it into a circle to leave the so-called antarctic as the outer gradient to the dome as a foundation.
Go on then, show me how it works.

You can get the prit stick out and cut a strip of paper to the required length. Use Km for the measurment and then convert it to mm . Take the known distances between half a dozen or so major cities on 5 different continents and see if it still lies flat.
Try London - Johannesburg
London - Buenos Aires
Buenos Aires - Tokyo
Buenos Aires - Johannesburg
Buenosn Aires - Sydney
London - Tokyo
Johannesburg - Sydney
Sydney - London
London - New York
New York - Tokyo
London - Tokyo

You'd only need 11 strips of paper glued tip to tip. In my opinion you'd see that doesn't lie flat. The more different cities you add the more you'd expect see your model get rounder.

It's easy enough to try and if you are correct, your model will lie flat on the table.

This is a simple experiment you can do to prove us all wrong
 
The vortex is the extreme low pressure created by the internal energy known as the sun that acts like a nice big sort of plug hole where higher pressure always tries to equalise the lower pressure which causes a feed vortex. which would be extreme at the centre but much less severe the farther out of the circle you are.


Super friction/vibration/pressure differentials.

I explained that earlier.

Explained.


I explained why things are pushed down so pay more attention.
As for the pendulum, it works via the pressurised vortex.

Plenty but they're thrown aside in favour of fictional gravity so I can't help those who don't want to try and understand it, which is fine.

It doesn't. The stacked gas inside does that against the dense mass of the ball displacing it, aided by the stacked outer atmosphere which offers pressure changes to the casing.
Oh dear, so your detection experiments and reason for "knowing" it exists comes down to pretty much "it feels right".

This is a central vortex and not a new vortex like a plug hole to the centre. But if you are way off the centre in Australia* then it still pulls straight down and not at an oblique angle towards the north pole. Gotcha, makes perfect sense.

And this is pressure that can't be detected and different from the general weather system pressure that does affect pressure gauges, barometers etc. You can't track these waves of pressure with any instrument because I expect they are special.

Essentially it is a fantasy you dreamed up.

And as for the last bit, there is no stacked gas in the cylinder. It is all equal pressure that is why whichever way you turn it, the pressure gauge reads the same. You need to think this one through. Pressure is not directional.
No but how can it reflect so close to the source on the same dome wall and why such a different shape and why not as bright if its so close?
Surelyit would reflect on the opposite wall as the main reflection is beating down directly on me.
Why does it only reflect in that one spot
Your explanation doesn't make sense.
Can you sketch what you mean?
It is as bright, otherwise it would not have the intensity to cancel itself out in a solar eclipse. It is just your global mindset making you think it is not as bright. Just in the same way as we are not as bright as our resident possessor of the real truth.

The moon looking dimmer and completely different in almost every possible way does not prove we are on a spinning globe.
It's not as close as you think and it's also angled on the dome and also washed out wavelengths for most of it.
If the sun is reflecting off the dome straight down at us in all visible wavelengths, then how does some of it also reflect off at a completely different angle too, to look like something completely different?

Can you demonstrate a dome that does that with an image, or is it just dreamed up fantasy with no evidence?
 
Last edited:
The vortex is the extreme low pressure created by the internal energy known as the sun that acts like a nice big sort of plug hole where higher pressure always tries to equalise the lower pressure which causes a feed vortex. which would be extreme at the centre but much less severe the farther out of the circle you are.


Super friction/vibration/pressure differentials.

I explained that earlier.

Explained.


I explained why things are pushed down so pay more attention.
As for the pendulum, it works via the pressurised vortex.

Plenty but they're thrown aside in favour of fictional gravity so I can't help those who don't want to try and understand it, which is fine.

It doesn't. The stacked gas inside does that against the dense mass of the ball displacing it, aided by the stacked outer atmosphere which offers pressure changes to the casing.
This grouping of responses are some of the best in the thread. We'll done.
 
This is how reflections would work on your dome from central projector, me seeing a sun.
Explain how the moon would appear as it does, why don't more appear to the left or above?


Sun dogs rarely happen and only in winter, it's scorching here
The physics of reflection of a mirrored surface is well known and proven, the angle of incidence=angle of reflection. For a curved object that is the angle to the normal of the tangent of the curve at the point the light (or works with pool balls on an unusual pool table) strikes.

A good while ago I knocked up this where you have a light source, a dome and can change the width or height of the dome to look at different shapes. You can drag the point the light hits the dome around by moving point A. Using the well established laws of reflection you can see exactly how the sun would react from a central projector beneath a dome:

Notice the only way you can ever have the sun coming straight down (which would give no shadow) is if you live at the middle.

This is where you need magic bendy light (MBL) to make any of it work. Also known as instant reflection and refraction through the vibrating wavelengths of meringue oscillation due to mesospheric density pressured layer stacking.
 
Just put the landmass positions to fit the distances offered.
Basically, just cut the globe and spread it out then bring it into a circle to leave the so-called antarctic as the outer gradient to the dome as a foundation.
Oh God not this shit again.

Diameter of Earth - 7917.5 miles
London to Sydney - 10553 miles

Please explain how this is possible on a flat Earth?
 
Oh God not this shit again.

Diameter of Earth - 7917.5 miles
London to Sydney - 10553 miles

Please explain how this is possible on a flat Earth?
Notice what you quoted though. Just do this, tweak it in this way but I'm going to be vague while you do my work for me. I'm not going to prove it because I can't but you try to decipher what I'm saying so I can say you have done it wrong when you fail.

No flat earth map ever produced works. He can't escape that fact and can't provide one himself.
 
No, I don't remember saying that.
Maybe pay more attention.
Everyone else remembers.
You can observe the effects of the vortex all around us in various ways.
Go on then, invent two...
From Foucault's pendulum to tornadoes to mild swirling winds all due to pressure changes from the setup.
Well done, now try some real ones.
So many ways.
many, many, many....none.
Light cancels light.
Did You just say.....
Light cancels light.
'kinell you did!
Light cancels light.
That explains why it gets dark if I put the light on during the day right?
Come on, you didn't think you were going to slip that one in without at the very least an hilarious diagram.
 
Everyone else remembers.

Go on then, invent two...

Well done, now try some real ones.

many, many, many....none.

Did You just say.....

'kinell you did!

That explains why it gets dark if I put the light on during the day right?
Come on, you didn't think you were going to slip that one in without at the very least an hilarious diagram.
Light cancels light, light moves along the wavelength, vibration, friction, demagnification, whirlpool physics. it's all good stuff
 
You see a reflection of a reflection.

It's not as close as you think and it's also angled on the dome and also washed out wavelengths for most of it.

The angles give it all away as you pay more attention to how they work.

When the sun is opposite you see what you think is the moon. When the sun is moving over and away and down the dome, the reflection (moon) appears up on the other side higher up.
All angles of reflection and when properly illuminated you can actually see the big pocked carbon plate concavely offering a face to you.

You'll see many things including many suns. Some people will see one some will see a few. It varies depending on the angle.


When the sandal breaks you cannot blame the person it broke on. You must take responsibility for that.

Don't mind me, I'm just making a collection of some of the most mental things I've read on here.
Is this because I said you were no longer trying or did you forget the medication today?
Light cancels light, light moves along the wavelength, vibration, friction, demagnification, whirlpool physics. it's all good stuff
And I forgot to include "Super friction"
 
Last edited:
Back
Top