safcforever
Striker
I've already said it was to do with distance of the sun. That's why its shaded/darkened/blood moon etc. You're making yourself look silly here
-
The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
Please read this thread for more details.
New user registrations are currently disabled.
Put a flat earthier into space
- Thread starter southstander
- Start date
I've already said it was to do with distance of the sun. That's why its shaded/darkened/blood moon etc. You're making yourself look silly here
Bollocks trumps bullshit.
BigPete
Striker
nahwee
Winger
It’s your own personal definition, not shared by anyone else?
This is why you get ridiculed on here, the condescending high and mighty attitude despite you actually saying all of these things that have been pointed out to you. Maybe its you that needs to pay more attention, not just to posts on here, but to everything in life as you clearly have no clue about anything. You are the most arrogant ignorant and condescending poster on here. You are wrong about literally everything you have posted on here.
DaveH
Striker
No, that is seeing things and just saying vortex.
What is the vortex? What force drives it? How do you detect it? What have you done to show this thing that nobody has ever heard of exists? Why does it push things directly down, no matter where you are, yet makes Foucault's pendulum move in the way it does.
What experiment proves it exists and these are not down to other effects?
I noticed you avoided explaining the ball in a gas cannister. How does the vortex penetrate the mental cannister and still force the ball down?
This is a fantastic one. The sun is a projection of the inner light onto the ice dome. It heats the earth and air around us, but doesn't melt helium ice which is around -270 degrees. It can shine off a dome in ways that light can never be demonstrated with a dome and that is how it can give zero shadow at midday on certain parts of the world and precisely predictable times. Special angles and all that.What
While this is going on, the light splits off and makes a secondary reflection, which always looks completely different. Unwise fuckwits call this the moon. While this has many features like lunar seas (not actually a sea but an old name that stuck) and craters and more obviously changes shape, and the sun has sunspots but doesn't, this is all perfectly logical. However at certain times of the year, the sunlight bounces off the dome, gets part way to us, turns back on itself and cancels itself out. No idea why it does an about turn, but hey. Now wavelengths of light should be the exact but opposite phase and strength to neutralise it but that just happens, despite looking completely different and not being exactly the same.
Where it gets really clever is that it only does this under the path of totality. If you are not in the path of an eclipse at all then you don't see any of this. If you are somewhere in between you see only part of the sun being covered. This is exactly like what wouldn't happen with a projector onto a single screen where everyone sees the same thing. It is exactly what would happen if there were two objects, one passing in front of the other. You can knock this up on your kitchen table with two tins of beans (soup also works). Put one in front of the other about 30cm apart and kneel down to table level. If they are in alignment then one tin disappears from view. But lean to the side a little and there it is, lean a bit more and you can see the whole lot. This is clearly not what is happening in a solar eclipse and light just deciding to cancel itself out is entirely logical.
No maths exists in flattard land to predict when this will happen. However by accurately modelling the circular motion of the moon around the earth and the earth around the sun, astronomers have been able to predict eclipses for over 2000 years. Flattards have a couple of thousand years to catch up on this one. The fact the maths used by this lying bastard astronomers works completely accurately is just a fluke and down to their global mindset.
You go figure.
Last edited:
Portuguese horizon @Nukehasslefan
You must be logged on to see external links
Accidentally caught her while getting the horizon, apologies
You must be logged on to see external links
Last edited:
BigPete
Striker
Nukehasslefan
Winger
The vortex is the extreme low pressure created by the internal energy known as the sun that acts like a nice big sort of plug hole where higher pressure always tries to equalise the lower pressure which causes a feed vortex. which would be extreme at the centre but much less severe the farther out of the circle you are.
Super friction/vibration/pressure differentials.
I explained that earlier.
Explained.
I explained why things are pushed down so pay more attention.
As for the pendulum, it works via the pressurised vortex.
Plenty but they're thrown aside in favour of fictional gravity so I can't help those who don't want to try and understand it, which is fine.
It doesn't. The stacked gas inside does that against the dense mass of the ball displacing it, aided by the stacked outer atmosphere which offers pressure changes to the casing.
@Nukehasslefan how did you explain this again.
Sitting on my hols, fake sun reflecting down on to me from the projector, according to you the moon doesn't exist, so what is this in the sky today at the same time as the sun?
Sitting on my hols, fake sun reflecting down on to me from the projector, according to you the moon doesn't exist, so what is this in the sky today at the same time as the sun?
You must be logged on to see external links
Nukehasslefan
Winger
And what would you say the distance was in what that horizon picture depicts, left to right?
That's the reflection of the sun.
Did you think you would see a moon rock 240,000 miles away in daylight?
Last edited:
DPTT
Striker
Nukehasslefan
Winger
Anything?Haway Nukey man
But the sun I'm looking at is big and round why is that a little arc (not a carbon arc) also surely if it was a reflection it would be opposite.
I can see them both in the same sky without moving my head.
Probably 10 degrees apart?
DPTT
Striker
Am telling ya mam to stop letting you near the computer
Nukehasslefan
Winger
You see a reflection of a reflection.
She's been deceased for 19 years.Am telling ya mam to stop letting you near the computer
No but how can it reflect so close to the source on the same dome wall and why such a different shape and why not as bright if its so close?
Surelyit would reflect on the opposite wall as the main reflection is beating down directly on me.
Why does it only reflect in that one spot
Your explanation doesn't make sense.
Can you sketch what you mean?
Your understanding of how reflections work is typical of your global mindset. It's easy when it's all on a platter for you.
I'm just offering a potential alternative.
Nukehasslefan
Winger
It's not as close as you think and it's also angled on the dome and also washed out wavelengths for most of it.
The angles give it all away as you pay more attention to how they work.
When the sun is opposite you see what you think is the moon. When the sun is moving over and away and down the dome, the reflection (moon) appears up on the other side higher up.
All angles of reflection and when properly illuminated you can actually see the big pocked carbon plate concavely offering a face to you.
It doesn't. It just does that for you and those in your vicinity.
It won't because you believe you're on a spinning ball in a space vacuum with a 93 million-mile distant sun that is 850,000 miles in diameter with an added 2,000-mile diameter cement-looking moon rock that glows....and so on, so I honestly don't expect anything I say to make any sense to you.
Nahhh, you'll just have to commit it to memory and maybe sketch it yourself if you can get it. If not then just go through the motions.
