Put a flat earthier into space

[Nukehasslefan]

But how are you pretty sure the centre is made of crystals.

I didn't say the centre was made of crystals.

And the dome of helium and hydrogen ice that gives perfect reflections but keeps melting and refreezing?

Simple experiments point mew to this.

These are what we want to know about, what proof or experiments did you do to bring you to this?

I have no proof for you. You need to do stuff yourself if you want to think outside of the box.

It must have been bright all over the world that day as sound is the same as light remember

Eyes and ears and senses.

 

[legend7]

I didn't say the centre was made of crystals.

Simple experiments point mew to this.

I have no proof for you. You need to do stuff yourself if you want to think outside of the box.

Eyes and ears and senses.

I didn't say proof I asked you what experiments you have done?
I could be wrong and I'm sure others will correct me but I'm sure you said the centre was a crystal energy generator?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

It's not our "mindset". Unlike you, our minds aren't "set" at all.

Your exams don't back this up.

We're all scientific in our approaches.

Yep, we are.

If someone were to show us a proper unbiased repeatable scientific experiment that proved the earth wasn't a globe, we'd all be forced to admit we were wrong. That's what normal people do, you see? If someone proves us wrong, we admit it, apologise, and alter our view of reality to fit the new information.

Water level.

The man who invents a fantasy world with zero proof, none, to explain the maths and science of the real world that he can't get his feeble head around, then accuses everyone else of believing a fantasy. It's absolute gold. In a sad and pathetic way.

It all depends on who has invented the fantasy world. I offer you mine as nothing more than a thought exercise for yourselves and to offer you a thought process. I do not offer it as factual, unlike what you are offered with your spinning globe which you have absolutely no clue about in terms of physical facts but plenty of stories to make you believe they are facts..

You've been proven wrong hundreds of times now on this thread alone.

Not once.

You won't admit to even a single one of them though, because to do so would shatter your brittle little ego.

My ego is simply a steadfast stance. What is your ego?

Every need. You can't claim to have "done experiments" for something when you actually haven't.

I can if I know I have... and do not accept the words of someone on the internet who says I haven't.

Not unless you want to be known as a liar.

Absolutely not interested in who calls me a liar of whatever else. It's all been done and will likely be regurgitated. I say, carry on if it suits.

Previously they DIDN'T believe it was a globe, they were some of the world's foremost globe deniers, but then they did some proper unbiased scientific experiments to try to prove it wasn't a globe. Unfortunately for them, their experiments actually proved that they had been wrong all along, and that the world is actually a globe after all. They then tried to cover up their findings because they didn't want their globe-denier cash cow to dry up.

The Earth is absolutely not a spinning globe we supposedly walk upon no matter what people say. In my honest opinion.
What you put up as people seemingly going from one side to another is of no concern to me.

So... were they telling the truth about being globe deniers who accidentally proved themselves wrong with proper scientific experiments, or were they in on the conspiracy all along, building up an internet following for years and years as globe deniers so that they could discredit the globe denier community by faking their eventual experiments that "proved" the world is a globe?

I have no clue and I'm actually not interested.

Curved water level kills the cell world model dead.

Have a think about what you're saying.

I didn't say proof I asked you what experiments you have done?
I could be wrong and I'm sure others will correct me but I'm sure you said the centre was a crystal energy generator?

No I didn't. I said the centre had crystal in it which reflected the energy from the super carbon arcing.

I do because I can't see how, without very expensive, specialist equipment you have done your experiment with sufficient accuracy to prove there is no curvature on a body of water.

This is what an open mind does, it asks for help to understand and if what you describe as your experiment works, then my view will have to change.

I'm not asking you to convince me. I am asking you to explain how I can prove it myself

Put your mind to work.

 

[Nobby]

The Earth is absolutely not a spinning globe we supposedly walk upon no matter what people say. In my honest opinion.

Ok I accept you will never say how you have proved water is flat.
You have your reasons for that.

The above two sentences from you are very strange.

The first makes a statement of fact, the second offers it only as an opinion.

For clarity do you

A) know the world isn't a globe

or

B) believe that the world isn't a globe

They are very different positions but you claimed them both

 

[payne]

Ok I accept you will never say how you have proved water is flat.
You have your reasons for that.

The above two sentences from you are very strange.

The first makes a statement of fact, the second offers it only as an opinion.

For clarity do you

A) know the world isn't a globe

or

B) believe that the world isn't a globe

They are very different positions but you claimed them both

he's deluded and a liar and ne knows the the second of my statements to be true

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Ok I accept you will never say how you have proved water is flat.
You have your reasons for that.

The above two sentences from you are very strange.

The first makes a statement of fact, the second offers it only as an opinion.

For clarity do you

A) know the world isn't a globe

or

B) believe that the world isn't a globe

They are very different positions but you claimed them both

A and B apply to you also, only change the isn't to is.

 

[Nobby]

A and B apply to you also, only change the isn't to is.

No, I am happy to pin my colours to the mast that I know the earth is a globe.

So back to you

Do you know it's not or do you believe it's not?

 

[Roman maroni]

You must be logged on to see media items

Water doesn't curve, what's this then?

 

[payne]

You must be logged on to see media items

Water doesn't curve, what's this then?

thats the best water cgi I've ever seen. Hollywood really needs to up their efforts in film

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Water doesn't curve, what's this then?

Will be ignored or dismissed as fakery.

 

[Roman maroni]

Will be ignored or dismissed as fakery.

Of course it will.

 

[DaveH]

I'm sure you can explain....right?

Ok.

Just observation will do over distance.


It seems plenty good enough to build upwards....plumb and it seems to do a fantastic job of level, horizontally.
It's not very good trying to make curve level but then again it doesn't logically need to unless someone invents a curved spirit bubble to do a job for a globe.
Chances?
Zero.
Why?
Because we do not walk upon a globe.

I've explained enough.

I have all the proof I need. What you deem it to be is not my issue.

You don;t need my help.
Put your scientific mind to work.

So you don't measure, you look in the distance and say "aye that is flat that like"?

 

[payne]

So you don't measure, you look in the distance and say "aye that is flat that like"?

simple, repeatable and testable using eyeball usage

 

[fyl2u]

Your exams don't back this up.

What exams? What are you talking about?

Do you mean my qualifications? Are you suggesting that because I actually have an education I'm therefore incapable of intelligent thought? You don't seem to understand how the education system works beyond primary school level.

Yep, we are.

No, WE are. You are not. You're just parroting the schooled bollocks you've been brainwashed into believing by the flat earth community.

Water level.

Proves the earth is a globe.

It all depends on who has invented the fantasy world. I offer you mine as nothing more than a thought exercise for yourselves and to offer you a thought process. I do not offer it as factual, unlike what you are offered with your spinning globe which you have absolutely no clue about in terms of physical facts but plenty of stories to make you believe they are facts..

Don't talk shite. You don't understand maths or physics so you just dent everything rather than admit you're too thick to understand it all. Then you parrot the flat earth society's lies because it makes more sense to your feeble brain.

Not once.

Every time you deny it, it adds 1 to the total.

It adds 1 to the total number of lies you've told on this thread too.

My ego is simply a steadfast stance. What is your ego?

A steadfast stance is the sign of a feeble mind and a fragile ego. So is trying to use whataboutery as a deflection technique from your own inadequacies.

I can if I know I have... and do not accept the words of someone on the internet who says I haven't.

No you haven't you liar.

Absolutely not interested in who calls me a liar of whatever else. It's all been done and will likely be regurgitated. I say, carry on if it suits.

I'll carry on until you stop lying.

The Earth is absolutely not a spinning globe we supposedly walk upon no matter what people say. In my honest opinion.
What you put up as people seemingly going from one side to another is of no concern to me.

They didn't go from one side to the other. They tried to prove the earth wasn't a spinning globe, accidentally proved the earth WAS a spinning globe, then tried to cover it up so that they could keep lying about the earth not being a spinning globe.

I have no clue and I'm actually not interested.

Of course not. You're not interested in anything that proves you wrong. You formed your opinion years ago and no amount of proof would ever change your mind. That's why you're not a scientist, you're a gobshite.

Have a think about what you're saying.

Curved water level kills the cell earth dead.

 

[Kevj]

simple, repeatable and testable using eyeball usage

I want some of those calibrated eyes like.

I'm sure you can explain....right?

Yip. I can.

 

[BigPete]

I've had a muse blows it all out the water..

Earth is a giant banana.. thats how all the water is held.

I've done experiments which prove this so you are all wrong!

 

[nahwee]

Is that why the Krakatoa eruption caused a sound wave that travelled in a way exactly consistent with Earth being a globe, but it's definitely not because reasons?

All the talk of barometers brings me back to this.

The pressure wave from the Krakatoa explosion spread outwards in all directions, like the rings formed when you throw a stone into a pond, around the globe, reached its antipode in Honduras and returned to the epicenter.

In geography, the antipode of any spot on Earth is the point on Earth's surface diametrically opposite to it. A pair of points antipodal to each other are situated such that a straight line connecting the two would pass through Earth's center. Antipodal points are as far away from each other as possible.

As I said the wave was recorded, using barographs, by independent observers at various points on the earth. When the data was collected and collated it was seen that the wave converged at one point on the earth, Honduras, which was the antipode of the eruption, the epicentre.

One point on the earth. Not at several points around a continuous gradient that arcs up into the dome. Like the sides of your bath.

I can’nt explain or imagine how this could happen on any shape other than a sphere, can you?

Or, if the earth is not a globe, as Honduras is the farthest point from the epicentre the wave reached before it started on its return, Honduras must lie on a place where the continuous gradient that arcs up into the dome is.

This took place in 1883, as DaveH maintains, barographs have been around for some time.

You do believe that Krakatoa erupted and that the magnitude of the eruption created a pressure wave that was mapped as it travelled across the earth?

I've never looked it up and have no need to. It's just another piece of history that's added in as some kind of proof of a globe.

No need for reasons when: "It's just another piece of history that's added in as some kind of proof of a globe."

 

[payne]

No need for reasons when: "It's just another piece of history that's added in as some kind of proof of a globe."

It's mental, isn't it? I've never looked it up and have no need to.........what a sentence

If he were born in a fundamentalist country he'd definitely be a candidate for a religious cleric.

 

[Nobby]

No need for reasons when: "It's just another piece of history that's added in as some kind of proof of a globe."

No need to look up stuff that disproves my theory

No need to do any experiments that prove my theory

Unable to state if he know or believes his theory to be true

As you say to total fundamentalist, he be planting IEDs at the Greenwich Observatory before long

 

[What A Waster]

I've had a muse blows it all out the water..

Earth is a giant banana.. thats how all the water is held.

I've done experiments which prove this so you are all wrong!

Sounds a peel to authority