The Snockerty Friddle
Winger
I swear I heard that next week, and it'll probably be repeated yesterday.
-
The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
Please read this thread for more details.
New user registrations are currently disabled.
Put a flat earthier into space
- Thread starter southstander
- Start date
Nukehasslefan
Winger
It's not just behind it, it's aside of it.
It's a crush back due to mass expanse of burning gases that bare immediately reacted to with massive atmospheric pressure crush back creating the consistent barrier and allowing the rocket to continually sit atop of it as it's pushed up.
And the point you're missing is 1000 mph.
The Snockerty Friddle
Winger
As has been pointed out several times now, you don't feel the speed, ANY speed, only the acceleration or deceleration.
You don't feel flung out as if on a fairground ride because the curve you follow is so slight and the force that would throw you off the surface is even less than the gravity keeping you there.
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan
Winger
What is a vacuum relief?
Of course I don't. How can I, according to you and those who follow the patterns set out.
You believe it all and I don't, so it's obviously I know nothing to you and you're welcome to it.
Try it yourself it's easy enough.
Maybe if you had offered some proof, or even just some evidence that points towards that, but you have offered NOTHING!
However the simple experiment I mentioned that shows the counter rotation of the stars in the southern hemisphere kills the flat Earth stone dead.
taipeisafc
Striker
Vacuum relief is a device which allows gas to flow into something to prevent it being damaged by vacuum conditions (caused by flow out or condensation inside the vessel) how come you need to ask that I thought you were an expert on all things vacuum related?
You have no clue about a multitude of scientific principles but you feel qualified to say they are wrong? You have already stated that there is only a single law of motion, gravity doesn't exist, all energy is friction, light is instantaneous amongst some other pearlers yet you admit you don't have a clue about the underlying science?
I don't need to provide proof as you are wrong - you made the 100% statement so you need to provide proof. If you can't then it is obviously a lie.
You must be logged on to see media items
Vaccum relief in a video saves you reading
Last edited:
I asked you a question. Can you answer it or not?
You should know by now he doesn't answer questions that he doesn't like the look of where they might take the conversation ie to something he hasn't watched on YouTube yet
DaveH
Striker
So you are back to saying polar explorers are all liars then? They didn’t just forget how to nagivate, they lie and are part of the cover up?
Do you agree that speed is distance over time?
One if the big things about a fairground ride is that they constantly change the speed. A rollercoaster is up, down and round sharp corners. A waltzer speeds up and slows down, etc etc?
Why do they do this? Because we don’t feed speed, we feel a force acting on us. That force is caused by the change in speed, the acceleration.
He seems stuck in a loop shouting 1000mph, but doesn’t even understand where that figure comes from.
Last edited:
zinedine
Striker
Anything new since the last time I read this thread 5 weeks ago? It has to be the most pointless discussion ever on this forum. He'll never change his mind whatever is put forward. It's all a conspiracy and everybody is lying. Including captain Kirk. That's a lot of liars and strangely not one of these liars has come clean and told the truth. You'd think at least one of them would have blabbed by now. I'm sure there's a reason for that.
Well, you wouldn't, seeing as you deny the poles exist.
Nukehasslefan
Winger
Expansion into extreme low pressure creating next to zero propulsion.
As I pointed out, you feel the force when you're rotating and especially at 1000 mph, but even 1 mph would be felt.
chelt_mackem said:
Maybe if you had offered some proof, or even just some evidence that points towards that, but you have offered NOTHING!Nukehasslefan said:
And you have offered NOTHING for proof of a spinning globe.
chelt_mackem said:
However the simple experiment I mentioned that shows the counter rotation of the stars in the southern hemisphere kills the flat Earth stone dead.Nukehasslefan said:
It does nothing of the sort.
Ahhh ok. You mean a pressure release valve.
I have no issue with scientific principles. It's the one's that aren't is what I have an issue with.
I stand by all that.
That depends on what the underlying science is.
Yeah, a pressure release to stop implosion.
It doesn't go against anything I'm saying.
What was the question?
Last edited:
It conclusively and simultaneously proves the globe and kills the flat Earth. If you think it doesn't, explain in detail why.
What
OK on your map, you set off from Greenland heading north/centre, your compass is pointing north.
You keep going and going and going..... across a "central" land mass and you keep going a bit more and you end up in Northern Russia, you can do this from varying opposing land masses.
Also as you cross and keep moving forwards you will find as you cross the central land mass/pole your compass will then start pointing South........
This is pretty simple to understand for most people and you yourself said compasses point north towards the centre, south to the outer rim, east/west in a circle around the lemon squeezer so how do you explain this?
As for planes.......
You must be logged on to see external links
Nukehasslefan
Winger
Mistaken or maybe fabricating. One thing for sure. They're not arriving at the centre of Earth,.
It depends on how they navigate and where their navigation ceases and how they know they are at a certain point of proof.
Do you know or are you simply parroting?
Yep, I agree with that.
A roller coaster is not a circumference ride.
A waltzer is a bumpy one and you feel that force massively even though the plates below are moving slowly.
The force is exactly what I'm talking about. We don't feel it because Earth is not spinning.
No, it's not. Not in the case of rotation.
A straight line and moving in a sealed container/vehicle will show little pressure to feel t he motion. But we aren't talking about straight lines nor acceleration or slowing down.
I don;t see anyone telling me where it comes from.
1000 mph is exactly that or why use it?
I hope you try to use RELATIVE.
He won't share any of his experiments, yesterday he claimed he had done some regarding propulsion in very low pressure, he won't let us see them though, can't even draw a basic section of his world man.
payne
Striker
How proud can one person be to be so wrong about everything. Congratulations.
I think you need to ask yourself a few of these questions fella.
What about your wife being a spy/murderer/prostitute, you admit there is a possibility?
payne
Striker
maybe a figment of his imagination like everything that comes out of his mouth
