• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space


How far behind the exhaust is atmospheric barrier and does any of the exhaust gas get through it?
It's not just behind it, it's aside of it.
It's a crush back due to mass expanse of burning gases that bare immediately reacted to with massive atmospheric pressure crush back creating the consistent barrier and allowing the rocket to continually sit atop of it as it's pushed up.
And the point you are missing is the immense difference between revolving around a little fairground ride and a planet.
Walk around a lamp post and your direction changes with every step, but go around a circle 40,000km in circumference and you will barely notice the turn.
And the point you're missing is 1000 mph.
 
And the point you're missing is 1000 mph.
As has been pointed out several times now, you don't feel the speed, ANY speed, only the acceleration or deceleration.
You don't feel flung out as if on a fairground ride because the curve you follow is so slight and the force that would throw you off the surface is even less than the gravity keeping you there.
 
Last edited:
He keeps rambling on about vacuum and his latest utter drivel is about "super strong containers to contain absolute vacuum" so a differential pressure of 1 bar - the vast majority of our pressure vessels are designed for full vac rating as it means we don't need vacuum relief on there.
What is a vacuum relief?
He has utterly no clue about vacuum, gases, pressure, rotation, navigation, newtons laws, inertia, expansion, reactive forces...I could go on but it would be a long list but the longer this thread goes on the stupidier he shows himself to be.
Of course I don't. How can I, according to you and those who follow the patterns set out.
You believe it all and I don't, so it's obviously I know nothing to you and you're welcome to it.
fyl2u said :

"A balloon released in a vacuum would travel much faster than the same balloon released in your living room."

Nukehasslefan said :

"Absolutely not. 100% not.
That's a fiction told to people who will simply believe it for no other reason than they believe space is a reality of a vacuum...etc."

So prove it then. If you are saying 100% not then you must have proof to back it up so lets see it. If you have no proof then yet again you are lying.
Try it yourself it's easy enough.
 
I don't see anything destroyed other than the spinning global Earth and all of the utter nonsense that goes with it.
Maybe if you had offered some proof, or even just some evidence that points towards that, but you have offered NOTHING!

However the simple experiment I mentioned that shows the counter rotation of the stars in the southern hemisphere kills the flat Earth stone dead.
 
What is a vacuum relief?

Of course I don't. How can I, according to you and those who follow the patterns set out.
You believe it all and I don't, so it's obviously I know nothing to you and you're welcome to it.

Try it yourself it's easy enough.

Vacuum relief is a device which allows gas to flow into something to prevent it being damaged by vacuum conditions (caused by flow out or condensation inside the vessel) how come you need to ask that I thought you were an expert on all things vacuum related?

You have no clue about a multitude of scientific principles but you feel qualified to say they are wrong? You have already stated that there is only a single law of motion, gravity doesn't exist, all energy is friction, light is instantaneous amongst some other pearlers yet you admit you don't have a clue about the underlying science?

I don't need to provide proof as you are wrong - you made the 100% statement so you need to provide proof. If you can't then it is obviously a lie.
You must be logged on to see media items

Vaccum relief in a video saves you reading
 
Last edited:
Why do people claim they've landed on the moon?
Why do Anglers say it was this>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>big?
Why do people cheat?
Why do people tell lies?
Why do people fantasize?
Why do people believe lies?
Why do people trust?
Why do people claim to have descended 7 miles down into ocean?

And so on

Let's deal with 1000 mph spinning on a globe as we're told.





1000 mph is 1000 mph regardless of size.

I don't see anything destroyed other than the spinning global Earth and all of the utter nonsense that goes with it.

It is man made.
Time has no relevance other than to man made time pieces and the order in which we follow them.
Take away time and dates and we simply live in the moment, not the past and not the present. The now.
No yesterday, no tomorrow, just the NOW.

I don't see anything flying over so called poles.
So you are back to saying polar explorers are all liars then? They didn’t just forget how to nagivate, they lie and are part of the cover up?


Do you agree that speed is distance over time?
As has been pointed out several times now, you don't feel the speed, ANY speed, only the acceleration or deceleration.
You don't feel flung out as if on a fairground ride because the curve you follow is so slight and the force that would throw you off the surface is even less than the gravity keeping you there.
One if the big things about a fairground ride is that they constantly change the speed. A rollercoaster is up, down and round sharp corners. A waltzer speeds up and slows down, etc etc?

Why do they do this? Because we don’t feed speed, we feel a force acting on us. That force is caused by the change in speed, the acceleration.

He seems stuck in a loop shouting 1000mph, but doesn’t even understand where that figure comes from.
 
Last edited:
Anything new since the last time I read this thread 5 weeks ago? It has to be the most pointless discussion ever on this forum. He'll never change his mind whatever is put forward. It's all a conspiracy and everybody is lying. Including captain Kirk. That's a lot of liars and strangely not one of these liars has come clean and told the truth. You'd think at least one of them would have blabbed by now. I'm sure there's a reason for that.
 
and the equal and opposite reaction would be....?
Expansion into extreme low pressure creating next to zero propulsion.
As has been pointed out several times now, you don't feel the speed, ANY speed, only the acceleration or deceleration.
You don't feel flung out as if on a fairground ride because the curve you follow is so slight and the force that would throw you off the surface is even less than the gravity keeping you there.
As I pointed out, you feel the force when you're rotating and especially at 1000 mph, but even 1 mph would be felt.
Nukehasslefan said:
I don't see anything destroyed other than the spinning global Earth and all of the utter nonsense that goes with it.

chelt_mackem said:

Maybe if you had offered some proof, or even just some evidence that points towards that, but you have offered NOTHING!
Nukehasslefan said:
And you have offered NOTHING for proof of a spinning globe.

chelt_mackem said:

However the simple experiment I mentioned that shows the counter rotation of the stars in the southern hemisphere kills the flat Earth stone dead.
Nukehasslefan said:
It does nothing of the sort.
Vacuum relief is a device which allows gas to flow into something to prevent it being damaged by vacuum conditions (caused by flow out or condensation inside the vessel) how come you need to ask that I thought you were an expert on all things vacuum related?

Ahhh ok. You mean a pressure release valve.
You have no clue about a multitude of scientific principles but you feel qualified to say they are wrong?
I have no issue with scientific principles. It's the one's that aren't is what I have an issue with.
You have already stated that there is only a single law of motion, gravity doesn't exist, all energy is friction, light is instantaneous amongst some other pearlers
I stand by all that.

yet you admit you don't have a clue about the underlying science?
That depends on what the underlying science is.
I don't need to provide proof as you are wrong - you made the 100% statement so you need to provide proof. If you can't then it is obviously a lie.
You must be logged on to see media items

Vaccum relief in a video saves you reading
Yeah, a pressure release to stop implosion.
It doesn't go against anything I'm saying.
I asked you a question. Can you answer it or not?
What was the question?
 
Last edited:
Expansion into extreme low pressure creating next to zero propulsion.

As I pointed out, you feel the force when you're rotating and especially at 1000 mph, but even 1 mph would be felt.

chelt_mackem said:

Maybe if you had offered some proof, or even just some evidence that points towards that, but you have offered NOTHING!
Nukehasslefan said:
And you have offered NOTHING for proof of a spinning globe.

chelt_mackem said:

However the simple experiment I mentioned that shows the counter rotation of the stars in the southern hemisphere kills the flat Earth stone dead.
Nukehasslefan said:
It does nothing of the sort.
It conclusively and simultaneously proves the globe and kills the flat Earth. If you think it doesn't, explain in detail why.
 
If you go opposite the one you left, where are you going?
If you go north and hit another landmass that is north then carry on north to another landmass then you still haven't reached any centre
Do planes fly over these so called poles to make destinations easier to get to?
What 🤪🤪🤪
OK on your map, you set off from Greenland heading north/centre, your compass is pointing north.
You keep going and going and going..... across a "central" land mass and you keep going a bit more and you end up in Northern Russia, you can do this from varying opposing land masses.
Also as you cross and keep moving forwards you will find as you cross the central land mass/pole your compass will then start pointing South........
This is pretty simple to understand for most people and you yourself said compasses point north towards the centre, south to the outer rim, east/west in a circle around the lemon squeezer so how do you explain this?
As for planes.......

 
So you are back to saying polar explorers are all liars then?
Mistaken or maybe fabricating. One thing for sure. They're not arriving at the centre of Earth,.
They didn’t just forget how to nagivate, they lie and are part of the cover up?
It depends on how they navigate and where their navigation ceases and how they know they are at a certain point of proof.
Do you know or are you simply parroting?
Do you agree that speed is distance over time?
Yep, I agree with that.
One if the big things about a fairground ride is that they constantly change the speed. A rollercoaster is up, down and round sharp corners. A waltzer speeds up and slows down, etc etc?

A roller coaster is not a circumference ride.
A waltzer is a bumpy one and you feel that force massively even though the plates below are moving slowly.

Why do they do this? Because we don’t feed speed, we feel a force acting on us.
The force is exactly what I'm talking about. We don't feel it because Earth is not spinning.
That force is caused by the change in speed, the acceleration.
No, it's not. Not in the case of rotation.
A straight line and moving in a sealed container/vehicle will show little pressure to feel t he motion. But we aren't talking about straight lines nor acceleration or slowing down.
He seems stuck in a loop shouting 1000mph, but doesn’t even understand where that figure comes from.
I don;t see anyone telling me where it comes from.

1000 mph is exactly that or why use it?
I hope you try to use RELATIVE.
 
He keeps rambling on about vacuum and his latest utter drivel is about "super strong containers to contain absolute vacuum" so a differential pressure of 1 bar - the vast majority of our pressure vessels are designed for full vac rating as it means we don't need vacuum relief on there. He has utterly no clue about vacuum, gases, pressure, rotation, navigation, newtons laws, inertia, expansion, reactive forces...I could go on but it would be a long list but the longer this thread goes on the stupidier he shows himself to be.

fyl2u said :

"A balloon released in a vacuum would travel much faster than the same balloon released in your living room."

Nukehasslefan said :

"Absolutely not. 100% not.
That's a fiction told to people who will simply believe it for no other reason than they believe space is a reality of a vacuum...etc."

So prove it then. If you are saying 100% not then you must have proof to back it up so lets see it. If you have no proof then yet again you are lying.
He won't share any of his experiments, yesterday he claimed he had done some regarding propulsion in very low pressure, he won't let us see them though, can't even draw a basic section of his world man.
 
Mistaken or maybe fabricating. One thing for sure. They're not arriving at the centre of Earth,.

It depends on how they navigate and where their navigation ceases and how they know they are at a certain point of proof.
Do you know or are you simply parroting?

Yep, I agree with that.


A roller coaster is not a circumference ride.
A waltzer is a bumpy one and you feel that force massively even though the plates below are moving slowly.


The force is exactly what I'm talking about. We don't feel it because Earth is not spinning.

No, it's not. Not in the case of rotation.
A straight line and moving in a sealed container/vehicle will show little pressure to feel t he motion. But we aren't talking about straight lines nor acceleration or slowing down.

I don;t see anyone telling me where it comes from.

1000 mph is exactly that or why use it?
I hope you try to use RELATIVE.
How proud can one person be to be so wrong about everything. Congratulations.
 
Back
Top