So light and sound are the same.
Light is the product of sound. Sound is the product of vibration/friction and frequency.
One can't work without the other.
In terms of us mere human beings it's all about what we detect not wholly what is happening at the lowest end or the highest end of the scale.
We're just not that perceptible.
Light needs a medium to travel through but doesn’t actually travel because it is just instantaneous, but sound does travel and far far slower than light.
Let me try and make this easy.
If someone shines a torch from distance to a point where you can see that light, you see it because it's instant. It's instant because it's reflecting through the atmosphere to your eye.
The nonsense that light takes time to reach you and can reach you from the past, in terms of so called stars, is hogwash and people must be suspicious of that nonsense, I would think.
Anyway, sound takes time to hit our ear drums because it's a pressure. A vibration/friction and a frequency.
This is why we see the light before we register the sound that creates it.
This means they are the same because of an experiment which you claim to have done but refuse to share details of, which does sound like lies.
You can look on them as the source. The same if you wish but how we perceive them is by putting them into categories based on our own senses.
If you recall, the other day I said:
Actual science: Thousands of years of full disclosure. Experiments performed with full details of how and the results peer reviewed and published, put into the open for others to accept, repeat, challenge, modify and then those modified experiments published in the same way. The result is a gradual increase in more and more knowledge, improving on accuracy all the time. Sometimes this can be a complete u-turn if something really unexpected is discovered.
Ok then show me the 1000's of years of disclosure that you can verify.
Conspiracy theorists: Reject known science because they don’t understand it, does not meet their personal expectations, or just can’t be arsed to research.
Anyone can do that, not just so called conspiracy theorists.
Then it comes down to asking for clarity and when clarity cannot be shown due to all kinds of excuses, it gets suspiciously questioned and this is when a person becomes a CT to those who dislike the questioning.
Pull random idea out their arse which makes little sense and often a collection of these ideas contradict each other disproving their own ideas.
Such as?
Claim anyone who challenges them is a sheep following what they have been brainwashed into thinking,
We're all sheep like, including myself, so there's no dig. ANyone who cares to look around them will understand we follow narratives in many/most cases.
make out they are a free thinker and somehow better
Nahh. Thinking outside of the box but not thinking I'm (personally) better than others. I'd place that back at others who come out with this, to be fair.
, then when actual science does not agree either, claim a massive conspiracy cover up spanning every country on earth over hundreds of years, with no explanation of why anyone would cover that up or how to keep such a secret for so long in what ends up being a very complex conspiracy involving hundreds of thousands of those in the know.
It depends on what's been told and sold.
It is pretty clear which group you belong to.
You can pout me in any group you wish. It doesn't matter to me how you see me.
Predicted answer to this: I’m a sheep, you don’t have to give details of your experiments and it is pretty simple when you think about it (if you sniff paint thinners first)
Hero syndrome
If you want to use those words on a regular basis then copy then and find a place to reference, then just paste it as many times as you feel the need to.