Put a flat earthier into space

[nahwee]

Ah right. So is the dome wave the thing responsible for tides?

Posts 1289 & 1292 explain this quite well

 

[taipeisafc]

Absolute cretin You havent got a clue man, take the tin foil hat off and go outside once in a while.

Couldn't have put it better myself.

By the movement of the central super carbon arc movement transferred. The central energy will be acting like a capacitor which stores and releases energy for a brief period which lowers it down a funnel until recharge, then back up.
This creates a turning as it does this, both down and back up by small margins.

This also creates a dome wave with lowering pressure and gaining pressure as it moves down and back up.

Can you write in actual sentences in future instead of randomly selecting words and putting then together. Plank

 

[payne]

Couldn't have put it better myself.


Can you write in actual sentences in future instead of randomly selecting words and putting then together. Plank

By the movement of the central super carbon arc movement transferred.


Kwolity!

 

[DaveH]

It is detected but it's detected on a small scale on land and on ships and what not with simple barometers and other instruments that measure small changes.

it is detected but only by water. Magic pressure that only affects a water gauge but not any other known form of pressure gauge.

But you said it has been detected. Can you provide evidence of this?

By the movement of the central super carbon arc movement transferred.


Kwolity!

This is the sort of thing I've mentioned before. A few weeks ago I described the basic properties of the sun-earth-moon system. 3 globes, spinning, gravity holding them together. That is it. But they question the force holding things together, making them spin, where is this movement coming from etc? Reasonable questions. But rather than answer or accept the accepted answer they scream "no" and replace it with something batshit crazy and incredibly complicated that doesn't stand up to the same level of reasoning they applied to the accepted model.

This projection central has no weather systems over it because of some mystical force. The earth has a central heat vent and this super carbon arc is moving about changing the focus of the sun. But then you have magic crystals projecting the other stuff, all moving independently, which is why the planets and occasional comets appear to move differently to the stars. What you are left with now is a complicated set of compact moving parts, all moving differently and independently at projection central. Oh and as well as the heat and lots of independent light sources, it blasts out a pressure wave that nobody has ever detected, bounces of the dome, through cloud without so much as a ripple but has a massive effect on tides on the oceans. Yet ships that get caught under this wave don't feel like they have just had a million watt hair dryer turned on them.

It all raises the questions, what force moves the crystals around, what force moves the movement carbon movement arc movement transfer movement etc? The more you dig the more complicated it becomes and of course there is absolutely zero evidence for it.

The mind of a paranoid delusional is an interesting place.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Ah right. So is the dome wave the thing responsible for tides?

It's responsible for pressure changes, so yes.

 

[nahwee]

It's responsible for pressure changes, so yes.

The energy eminates from a source at the centre of the earth, is reflected from the top the dome westwards, then reflects off the dome again and travels across the earth eastwards, creating the tides.
Like this?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

it is detected but only by water. Magic pressure that only affects a water gauge but not any other known form of pressure gauge. But you said it has been detected. Can you provide evidence of this?

Maybe you forgot about the barometer.
It's not magic pressure it's well known pressure and it's quite evident.
The thing is though you expect it to show itself on a massive scale.
I already showed you the water in the bath and how it rises and falls with the video.

If you want to make something else of it then that's your choice.

This is the sort of thing I've mentioned before. A few weeks ago I described the basic properties of the sun-earth-moon system. 3 globes, spinning, gravity holding them together. That is it.

Can you explain why this happens and do you have any proof of this? Your own words if you can.

But they question the force holding things together, making them spin, where is this movement coming from etc? Reasonable questions. But rather than answer or accept the accepted answer they scream "no" and replace it with something batshit crazy and incredibly complicated that doesn't stand up to the same level of reasoning they applied to the accepted model.

You mean the sun sitting in a warped space with an Earth and moon and what not just spiralling around it and that's supposed to make sense, is it?
It all depends on what's deemed as batsheet crazy. You go along with this and I believe it's batsheet crazy so you're more than entitled to call anything alternate to it, batsheet crazy.
Just remember though, you're operating with zero proof and a massive reliance on authority. You may not like what I say but this is what it is.

I

This projection central has no weather systems over it because of some mystical force.

That depends on what you deem as a weather system.
It would be a fast vortex towards the centre.
The mystical force is merely atmospheric pressure broken down into it's finer elements and feeding the energy with the so called exhausted energy put back into the Earth to carry on the cycle.

With a globe we have magical gravity and all the rest of the story, which I believe to be utter gunk.

The earth has a central heat vent and this super carbon arc is moving about changing the focus of the sun. But then you have magic crystals projecting the other stuff, all moving independently, which is why the planets and occasional comets appear to move differently to the stars.

There's a lot of stuff that's simply mirror imaged.

What you are left with now is a complicated set of compact moving parts, all moving differently and independently at projection central.

Nothing really complicated about it.

Oh and as well as the heat and lots of independent light sources, it blasts out a pressure wave that nobody has ever detected, bounces of the dome, through cloud without so much as a ripple but has a massive effect on tides on the oceans. Yet ships that get caught under this wave don't feel like they have just had a million watt hair dryer turned on them.

Maybe paying more attention would help you. I think other are taking more notice, even amid attempted put downs.

It all raises the questions, what force moves the crystals around

It doesn't.

what force moves the movement carbon movement arc movement transfer movement etc?

Electromagnetic induction.

The more you dig the more complicated it becomes and of course there is absolutely zero evidence for it.

It will be complicated to anyone who believes a spinning global model or alternate model. Of course it will seem like that.
For those who are of the mind to look deeper into it, it becomes much more simpler.

The energy eminates from a source at the centre of the earth, is reflected from the top the dome westwards, then reflects off the dome again and travels across the earth eastwards, creating the tides.
Like this?

The reflection from the energy from the centre we see as the sun is also reflecting over the dome as the moon. The less energised reflection of a reflection.

The dome is absolutely scattered with a lot of reflections of light already mirrored..

 

[nahwee]

The reflection from the energy from the centre we see as the sun is also reflecting over the dome as the moon. The less energised reflection of a reflection.

The dome is absolutely scattered with a lot of reflections of light already mirrored..

So that's a yes then.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

So that's a yes then.

I'm just elaborating on it.

 

[DaveH]

Maybe you forgot about the barometer.
It's not magic pressure it's well known pressure and it's quite evident.
The thing is though you expect it to show itself on a massive scale.
I already showed you the water in the bath and how it rises and falls with the video.

If you want to make something else of it then that's your choice.




Can you explain why this happens and do you have any proof of this? Your own words if you can.


You mean the sun sitting in a warped space with an Earth and moon and what not just spiralling around it and that's supposed to make sense, is it?
It all depends on what's deemed as batsheet crazy. You go along with this and I believe it's batsheet crazy so you're more than entitled to call anything alternate to it, batsheet crazy.
Just remember though, you're operating with zero proof and a massive reliance on authority. You may not like what I say but this is what it is.

I


That depends on what you deem as a weather system.
It would be a fast vortex towards the centre.
The mystical force is merely atmospheric pressure broken down into it's finer elements and feeding the energy with the so called exhausted energy put back into the Earth to carry on the cycle.

With a globe we have magical gravity and all the rest of the story, which I believe to be utter gunk.


There's a lot of stuff that's simply mirror imaged.


Nothing really complicated about it.



Maybe paying more attention would help you. I think other are taking more notice, even amid attempted put downs.


It doesn't.

Electromagnetic induction.



It will be complicated to anyone who believes a spinning global model or alternate model. Of course it will seem like that.
For those who are of the mind to look deeper into it, it becomes much more simpler.




The reflection from the energy from the centre we see as the sun is also reflecting over the dome as the moon. The less energised reflection of a reflection.

The dome is absolutely scattered with a lot of reflections of light already mirrored..

I’d not forgot about barometers. No barometer has ever detected this rhythm of pressure passing over the oceans that you speak of. Can you provide any documented evidence of this happening?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

I’d not forgot about barometers. No barometer has ever detected this rhythm of pressure passing over the oceans that you speak of. Can you provide any documented evidence of this happening?

A barometer will work on a ship or in your garden or home or shed or anywhere you want to take it on land and above water. It will change according to pressures.
If you're trying to argue why a barometer won't detect a massive push down on an ocean then...well, I'll let you sit and ponder that one.

 

[DaveH]

A barometer will work on a ship or in your garden or home or shed or anywhere you want to take it on land and above water. It will change according to pressures.
If you're trying to argue why a barometer won't detect a massive push down on an ocean then...well, I'll let you sit and ponder that one.

I’m not arguing that it will not, it certainly would. No barometer has ever recorded the regular 12 hour cycle you speak of. You can not provide any evidence of this happening. It is not real.

 

[Toronado]

Some sections of humanity are pushing on with questioning everything and ‘ intelligently ‘ debating everything to the point where fundamentals of the world proven by science are doubted, gravity, globe earth and wheres it gonna end

for me its all part of people who don't full leave the egocentric stage of development and can look the moon and stars and other globe planets and think for some reason ours would the odd one out ! Same kinda thinking develops the idea that there are 40,000 and gender a social construct overrides sex !

gonna end with the human race driving itself back into caves and the stone age at the rate its going and accepted !

 

[Nukehasslefan]

I’m not arguing that it will not, it certainly would. No barometer has ever recorded the regular 12 hour cycle you speak of. You can not provide any evidence of this happening. It is not real.

The evidence is visual. Look at the seas and the tides.

People like you go along with gravity. A cement like moon that somehow glows like a beacon that just happens to pull water up.
If that's what you want to go along with then it's absolutely fine with me. You have zero proof of it just as I cannot provide any more proof than, " it's atmospheric pressure." I explained why and that's my theory

 

[DaveH]

The evidence is visual. Look at the seas and the tides.

People like you go along with gravity. A cement like moon that somehow glows like a beacon that just happens to pull water up.
If that's what you want to go along with then it's absolutely fine with me. You have zero proof of it just as I cannot provide any more proof than, " it's atmospheric pressure." I explained why and that's my theory

That is not evidence. You are seeing the cause for something, coming up with an idea and assuming it to be true. There is no evidence ever recorded for the 12 hour cycle of pressure waves you speak of. Given air pressure is a key monitoring factor for weather there are a few hundred years of evidence showing what you speak of does not exist.

This is one step further from your usual drivel. Not only is there zero evidence of what you speak existing, there is absolute evidence it does not exist.

 

[Yam]

The evidence is visual. Look at the seas and the tides.

People like you go along with gravity. A cement like moon that somehow glows like a beacon that just happens to pull water up.
If that's what you want to go along with then it's absolutely fine with me. You have zero proof of it just as I cannot provide any more proof than, " it's atmospheric pressure." I explained why and that's my theory

Earlier in this thread you said there is no such thing as gravity and that objects fall to the earth because of atmospheric pressure pushing the object toward the earth.
You also say according to your model that there are different atmospheric pressures at different points within the dome.
Why then do objects fall at the exact same rate (9.81ms/s everywhere on the earth despite the different pressures? The laws of gravity, that's why!

 

[Nukehasslefan]

That is not evidence. You are seeing the cause for something, coming up with an idea and assuming it to be true.

No. I'm seeing what I believe is the cause and am not passing it off as factual as I've explained so many times but somehow you manage to overlook it and go right back to this.
Hmmm.
The reality is you go with gravity and all the rest of it because you buy into the mainstream ideals and you pass it off as fact based on your belief that it is fact, without any real evidence and no proof at all of anything factual in terms of what we're debating.

There is no evidence ever recorded for the 12 hour cycle of pressure waves you speak of.

To me it's evidence but anything recorded by anyone that would throw out a proof, then no. I mean who's going to go against magical gravity and have it looked at?

Given air pressure is a key monitoring factor for weather there are a few hundred years of evidence showing what you speak of does not exist.

No there isn't.

This is one step further from your usual drivel. Not only is there zero evidence of what you speak existing, there is absolute evidence it does not exist.

In your mind and the mind of those that think like you or follow the official lines, I agree.
The thing is, I 100% believe there is absolutely no proof of anything you say for a global spinning Earth.

 

[DaveH]

No. I'm seeing what I believe is the cause and am not passing it off as factual as I've explained so many times but somehow you manage to overlook it and go right back to this.
Hmmm.
The reality is you go with gravity and all the rest of it because you buy into the mainstream ideals and you pass it off as fact based on your belief that it is fact, without any real evidence and no proof at all of anything factual in terms of what we're debating.



To me it's evidence but anything recorded by anyone that would throw out a proof, then no. I mean who's going to go against magical gravity and have it looked at?



No there isn't.

In your mind and the mind of those that think like you or follow the official lines, I agree.
The thing is, I 100% believe there is absolutely no proof of anything you say for a global spinning Earth.

Can you provide any recorded evidence anywhere from any person or organisation showing this pressure wave happening? If not, why not?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Can you provide any recorded evidence anywhere from any person or organisation showing this pressure wave happening? If not, why not?

Can you provide any recorded evidence anywhere for gravity being the cause of tides?

Earlier in this thread you said there is no such thing as gravity and that objects fall to the earth because of atmospheric pressure pushing the object toward the earth.
You also say according to your model that there are different atmospheric pressures at different points within the dome.
Why then do objects fall at the exact same rate (9.81ms/s everywhere on the earth despite the different pressures? The laws of gravity, that's why!

They don't fall at the same rate.
They may appear to do so from a short height but that's about it.
You see we're handed the story of objects falling at the same rate in a vacuum and we get shown all kinds of stuff that supposedly proves it.

Then we get told they do this in atmospheric conditions, also and then show us someone dropping two balls. One a football and one a tennis ball, or whatever.
They hit the ground at roughly the same time and that's classed as 9.8 m/s fall rate.

When other objects are dropped and don't land together it's told to us "oh that's just air resistance."
Of course it is because that's what it all is.

Gravity is a magical made up concept to make space a believable thing and to make Earth a spinning globe with tides that work because of this magical mystery.

 

[taipeisafc]

Can you provide any recorded evidence anywhere from any person or organisation showing this pressure wave happening? If not, why not?

Ask the buffoon what pressure is needed to make the tides 10,000 Pa maybe.

Can you provide any recorded evidence anywhere for gravity being the cause of tides?

They don't fall at the same rate.
They may appear to do so from a short height but that's about it.
You see we're handed the story of objects falling at the same rate in a vacuum and we get shown all kinds of stuff that supposedly proves it.

Then we get told they do this in atmospheric conditions, also and then show us someone dropping two balls. One a football and one a tennis ball, or whatever.
They hit the ground at roughly the same time and that's classed as 9.8 m/s fall rate.

When other objects are dropped and don't land together it's told to us "oh that's just air resistance."
Of course it is because that's what it all is.

Gravity is a magical made up concept to make space a believable thing and to make Earth a spinning globe with tides that work because of this magical mystery.

Moron and a liar