• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

I've actually got a few digital barometers that measure to an accuracy of 1 bar (1 hPa) and they don't record this regular 12 hour wave, but they might not register if the change in pressure is quite small. That sounds reasonable anyway that a small change in pressure over a large ocean can have a large effect, but a small change in pressure over a small water body like a bath, it is just too insignificant to measure. Is that pretty much what is happening?
A digital barometer will measure the pressure change based on that barometer. How are you going to see any effects upon an ocean?
If you want to check out whether your bath water rises and falls you will need to rig up a gauge.

I can help you with this if you want and you can test it out.
 

I worked at sea for 11 years as a communications specialist, I can navigate, used to be able to navigate quite well, I probably would have noticed a flat earth like...
How do you explain a plan on the plain of the rational horizon being flat to demonstrate the PZX triangle?
You do know the globe is full of flat earthers?
A digital barometer will measure the pressure change based on that barometer. How are you going to see any effects upon an ocean?
If you want to check out whether your bath water rises and falls you will need to rig up a gauge.

I can help you with this if you want and you can test it out.
Need a barograph to continually measure pressure and recording tide pole to record height/depth, both with co-ordinated time recording.
 
Last edited:
A digital barometer will measure the pressure change based on that barometer. How are you going to see any effects upon an ocean?
If you want to check out whether your bath water rises and falls you will need to rig up a gauge.

I can help you with this if you want and you can test it out.
A gauge would report the same pressure as a digital one surely, only it will accurately record. I can't see what advantage a DIY one would give, only be dependent on the marked scale, human eye and sitting there all day. If there is a pressure change, both will detect it. I detect no such thing. But if the change in pressure is so small that a manual or digital one will not pick it up, I'm fine with that. It doesn't mean it is not there, just you need something more sensitive to see it. Is that what is going on?

So my digital pressure meters are not picking this wave that goes over the oceans? This reflected pressure goes over the oceans only and not the land? I do live on the coast, surely I'd see it a bit.
 
A gauge would report the same pressure as a digital one surely, only it will accurately record. I can't see what advantage a DIY one would give, only be dependent on the marked scale, human eye and sitting there all day. If there is a pressure change, both will detect it. I detect no such thing. But if the change in pressure is so small that a manual or digital one will not pick it up, I'm fine with that. It doesn't mean it is not there, just you need something more sensitive to see it. Is that what is going on?

So my digital pressure meters are not picking this wave that goes over the oceans? This reflected pressure goes over the oceans only and not the land? I do live on the coast, surely I'd see it a bit.

it's not a globe mate. no matter what.
 
A gauge would report the same pressure as a digital one surely, only it will accurately record. I can't see what advantage a DIY one would give, only be dependent on the marked scale, human eye and sitting there all day. If there is a pressure change, both will detect it. I detect no such thing. But if the change in pressure is so small that a manual or digital one will not pick it up, I'm fine with that. It doesn't mean it is not there, just you need something more sensitive to see it. Is that what is going on?

So my digital pressure meters are not picking this wave that goes over the oceans? This reflected pressure goes over the oceans only and not the land? I do live on the coast, surely I'd see it a bit.

Goes over oceans and seas and estuaries, up rivers but is undetectable on land
 
A gauge would report the same pressure as a digital one surely, only it will accurately record. I can't see what advantage a DIY one would give, only be dependent on the marked scale, human eye and sitting there all day. If there is a pressure change, both will detect it. I detect no such thing. But if the change in pressure is so small that a manual or digital one will not pick it up, I'm fine with that. It doesn't mean it is not there, just you need something more sensitive to see it. Is that what is going on?

So my digital pressure meters are not picking this wave that goes over the oceans? This reflected pressure goes over the oceans only and not the land? I do live on the coast, surely I'd see it a bit.

Like i said he has no idea what pressure is, i suspect he needs help getting dressed on a morning. Of course he also completely missed you mistake (deliberate i assume) on the pressure range of your digital barometer
 
Last edited:
A gauge would report the same pressure as a digital one surely, only it will accurately record. I can't see what advantage a DIY one would give, only be dependent on the marked scale, human eye and sitting there all day. If there is a pressure change, both will detect it. I detect no such thing. But if the change in pressure is so small that a manual or digital one will not pick it up, I'm fine with that. It doesn't mean it is not there, just you need something more sensitive to see it. Is that what is going on?

So my digital pressure meters are not picking this wave that goes over the oceans? This reflected pressure goes over the oceans only and not the land? I do live on the coast, surely I'd see it a bit.
What exactly are you doing with your digital pressure meter?
Here's a simple way to show what I'm talking about.
You must be logged on to see media items
 
Last edited:
The movement of the reflected energy from the centre of Earth. Where the reflected energy hits is the area where you create different pressures due to expansion and compression of atmospheric matter.

Help me here.
We know tides travel across the earth from west to east, continuously, every 12 1/2 hours.
How can this happen when the pressure source is located in the centre of the earth, surely it must have to be located on the very western side of our world?
A central source would mean the reflected energy wave would travel west and east simultaneously.
 
What exactly are you doing with your digital pressure meter?
Here's a simple way to show what I'm talking about.
You must be logged on to see media items
:D, you are ticking all the boxes of what myself and the others have said in the past about ignoring and deflection, refusing to be drawn into details and going on about Blue Peter barometers.

The bottom line is that no home made jar of water pressure gauge is going to be more accurate than a digital one. I’ve got 3 little temperature display units in my house because I wanted to graph over the year how the house performs thermally. The best sensor to use for them also has a pressure meter (BME280). In my veg garden, I wanted soil moisture sensors to alert me with when I needed to water or automatically water if I’m away. I thought I may as well put a temperature sensor in those, so I’ve got 6 accurate digital pressure meters that have been running and graphing pressure all year. I don’t need to check a home made diy job every half hour and mark it down with a pencil.

What I don’t see is this mythical 12 hour pressure wave passing over the planet, pushing the oceans. Worldwide there is loads of professional weather data that also fails to record this pressure. It doesn’t exist, so for your explanation then think again.

But what I find funny is it demonstrates how daft your bath tub experiment is. I asked 3 times and you deliberately avoided the questions. Why can’t you measure this pressure and why can’t you see it in a bath. We both know that if the answer is “because the effect is too slight in a bath and the pressure wave is too small to measure but has an effect when applied to something as big as the ocean”, that is exactly the same answer we give when you doubt the effect of the moons gravity in the tides or expect to see the curve of the earth in something as small as a bath.

I think you have tied yourself in a knot with this one. Your pressure wave is easily disproved. That is not doubt, that is not perception, that is not sitting on the bog saying “makes no sense to me”, that is no pressure wave such as you describe has ever been recorded by anything anywhere.
 
Help me here.
We know tides travel across the earth from west to east, continuously, every 12 1/2 hours.
How can this happen when the pressure source is located in the centre of the earth, surely it must have to be located on the very western side of our world?
A central source would mean the reflected energy wave would travel west and east simultaneously.
It's not about the energy in the centre but the reflection of it onto the dome and back to the area it hits as it's moving over and around that dome.

The central energy is simply the source.
We feel the effects of this in terms of fissures, which lead to eruptions in oceans and land.
The Earth is just a cell. Another organism. In my opinion , obviously.
 
It's not about the energy in the centre but the reflection of it onto the dome and back to the area it hits as it's moving over and around that dome.

The central energy is simply the source.
We feel the effects of this in terms of fissures, which lead to eruptions in oceans and land.
The Earth is just a cell. Another organism. In my opinion , obviously.

So the energy eminates from a source at the centre of the earth, is reflected from the top the dome westwards, then reflects off the dome again and travels across the earth eastwards, creating the tides.
Thanks for that!
It's so simple it just might work!
 
It's not about the energy in the centre but the reflection of it onto the dome and back to the area it hits as it's moving over and around that dome.

The central energy is simply the source.
We feel the effects of this in terms of fissures, which lead to eruptions in oceans and land.
The Earth is just a cell. Another organism. In my opinion , obviously.
So as well as heat and light, this projector site blasts out a high pressure wind jet that sweeps over the oceans, blasting them in the middle, pushing up tides. But this effect has never been detected and passes through clouds without affecting them. And you call the evidence for other models irrational :D
 
:D, you are ticking all the boxes of what myself and the others have said in the past about ignoring and deflection, refusing to be drawn into details and going on about Blue Peter barometers.
Nope. The issue is about the simplicity of what's been said.
I don't expect you to go along with it because your mindset is of a spinning globe with gravity and a 93 million miles sun plus a 240,000 mile moon supposedly doing what you've been told, in terms of the tides and what not.

I have no reason to want to change your mind on anything like that. You can go to your end with that thought but I won't be.
Everything is in or faces and simple. It's just a case of wanting to see it and basically reverse engineering the set up.
The bottom line is that no home made jar of water pressure gauge is going to be more accurate than a digital one.


I didn't think you'd get it.
It's about visual of the water rise and fall not a digital readout.
I’ve got 3 little temperature display units in my house because I wanted to graph over the year how the house performs thermally. The best sensor to use for them also has a pressure meter (BME280). In my veg garden, I wanted soil moisture sensors to alert me with when I needed to water or automatically water if I’m away. I thought I may as well put a temperature sensor in those, so I’ve got 6 accurate digital pressure meters that have been running and graphing pressure all year. I don’t need to check a home made diy job every half hour and mark it down with a pencil.


You can do as many little experiments as you want. You know for a fact there's pressure change but you're not measuring water change.
I've just handed you a simple experiment to do with that youtube video. Pat attention to the water rise and fall and while you do that think about it on a mammoth scale with oceans and such as the energy is moving over that area pushing it down bit by bit and it has to go somewhere, which is why tides happen. Water rises bit by bit as the pressure builds slowly. Then when the energy passes by the water lowers and the tides go in, slowly but surely.
This is why it happens over hours.

What I don’t see is this mythical 12 hour pressure wave passing over the planet, pushing the oceans. Worldwide there is loads of professional weather data that also fails to record this pressure. It doesn’t exist, so for your explanation then think again.

You do see it but your observations are due to gravitational pull or whatever you go with.
But what I find funny is it demonstrates how daft your bath tub experiment is.

Absolutely not.
I asked 3 times and you deliberately avoided the questions. Why can’t you measure this pressure and why can’t you see it in a bath. We both know that if the answer is “because the effect is too slight in a bath and the pressure wave is too small to measure but has an effect when applied to something as big as the ocean”, that is exactly the same answer we give when you doubt the effect of the moons gravity in the tides or expect to see the curve of the earth in something as small as a bath.
I've shown you in the youtube video.
I think you have tied yourself in a knot with this one.
Not in the least.
Your pressure wave is easily disproved.
Clearly not.
That is not doubt, that is not perception, that is not sitting on the bog saying “makes no sense to me”, that is no pressure wave such as you describe has ever been recorded by anything anywhere.
And yet you happily sit there and believe in gravity.
I'm more than content with what I go with.
So as well as heat and light, this projector site blasts out a high pressure wind jet that sweeps over the oceans, blasting them in the middle, pushing up tides.
Nope, not at all.
The high pressure wind, as you call it is a vortex to the centre.
It's a feed.
This same vortex gets weaker and weaker the farther outwards it is.



But this effect has never been detected and passes through clouds without affecting them. And you call the evidence for other models irrational :D
It is detected but it's detected on a small scale on land and on ships and what not with simple barometers and other instruments that measure small changes.
 
Last edited:
It's not about the energy in the centre but the reflection of it onto the dome and back to the area it hits as it's moving over and around that dome.

The central energy is simply the source.
We feel the effects of this in terms of fissures, which lead to eruptions in oceans and land.
The Earth is just a cell. Another organism. In my opinion , obviously.

How does this magnificent heat from the central crystals only slightly melt the ice dome, but then come back to earth at 35° in some places.

How come a heat source like that which heats the entire planet, situated at what we could both agree is the north pole, is not radiating any heat around it. Why is it freezing at the north pole, yet it manages to shoot heat out to heat places as far away as Australia without melting the frozen area around it?
So as well as heat and light, this projector site blasts out a high pressure wind jet that sweeps over the oceans, blasting them in the middle, pushing up tides. But this effect has never been detected and passes through clouds without affecting them. And you call the evidence for other models irrational :D

What if it was a cloudy day at the north pole/central crystal energy vortex, but not a cloud in the sky here? The reflection of the sun wouldn't show up because the cloud is blocking it.
Nope. The issue is about the simplicity of what's been said.
I don't expect you to go along with it because your mindset is of a spinning globe with gravity and a 93 million miles sun plus a 240,000 mile moon supposedly doing what you've been told, in terms of the tides and what not.

I have no reason to want to change your mind on anything like that. You can go to your end with that thought but I won't be.
Everything is in or faces and simple. It's just a case of wanting to see it and basically reverse engineering the set up.



I didn't think you'd get it.
It's about visual of the water rise and fall not a digital readout.



You can do as many little experiments as you want. You know for a fact there's pressure change but you're not measuring water change.
I've just handed you a simple experiment to do with that youtube video. Pat attention to the water rise and fall and while you do that think about it on a mammoth scale with oceans and such as the energy is moving over that area pushing it down bit by bit and it has to go somewhere, which is why tides happen. Water rises bit by bit as the pressure builds slowly. Then when the energy passes by the water lowers and the tides go in, slowly but surely.
This is why it happens over hours.



You do see it but your observations are due to gravitational pull or whatever you go with.


Absolutely not.

I've shown you in the youtube video.

Not in the least.

Clearly not.

And yet you happily sit there and believe in gravity.
I'm more than content with what I go with.

Nope, not at all.
The high pressure wind, as you call it is a vortex to the centre.
It's a feed.
This same vortex gets weaker and weaker the farther outwards it is.
Yet Australia have their summer time while we have winter. With heat deflected off a dome by a central energy vortex. How can it get weaker but also stronger
 
Last edited:
How does this magnificent heat from the central crystals only slightly melt the ice dome, but then come back to earth at 35° in some places.
I've already explained this not too far back.
How come a heat source like that which heats the entire planet, situated at what we could both agree is the north pole, is not radiating any heat around it. Why is it freezing at the north pole, yet it manages to shoot heat out to heat places as far away as Australia without melting the frozen area around it?
If a welder was in a room with an open top and a mirror above it and you were stood outside of that room, would you feel the heat of his welding arc?
If you looked up would you see it?
I'm just handing you the simplest thought process.

What if it was a cloudy day at the north pole/central crystal energy vortex, but not a cloud in the sky here? The reflection of the sun wouldn't show up because the cloud is blocking it.

The north pole isn't what we're told, in my opinion.
The north pole can merely be a snow covered area towards north on the compass.
As for clouds, it wouldn't be anything like that blocking anything.

The clouds we see would not be anywhere near that to block it.
Yet Australia have their summer time while we have winter. With heat deflected off a dome by a central energy vortex. How can it get weaker but also stronger
It's not deflected by a vortex.
The vortex is created by energy used by that central energy which is likely a super carbon arcing under crystal/diamond on a mammoth scale.

Australia will get the heat as the sun reflection moves over and around, just like we do.
If they're situated in a spot where the reflected sun hits with more severity then they will get a warmer climate,as will anything else.
 
I've already explained this not too far back.

If a welder was in a room with an open top and a mirror above it and you were stood outside of that room, would you feel the heat of his welding arc?
If you looked up would you see it?
I'm just handing you the simplest thought process.



The north pole isn't what we're told, in my opinion.
The north pole can merely be a snow covered area towards north on the compass.
As for clouds, it wouldn't be anything like that blocking anything.

The clouds we see would not be anywhere near that to block it.

It's not deflected by a vortex.
The vortex is created by energy used by that central energy which is likely a super carbon arcing under crystal/diamond on a mammoth scale.

Australia will get the heat as the sun reflection moves over and around, just like we do.
If they're situated in a spot where the reflected sun hits with more severity then they will get a warmer climate,as will anything else.

How does the reflection move?
 
How does the reflection move?
By the movement of the central super carbon arc movement transferred. The central energy will be acting like a capacitor which stores and releases energy for a brief period which lowers it down a funnel until recharge, then back up.
This creates a turning as it does this, both down and back up by small margins.

This also creates a dome wave with lowering pressure and gaining pressure as it moves down and back up.
 
By the movement of the central super carbon arc movement transferred. The central energy will be acting like a capacitor which stores and releases energy for a brief period which lowers it down a funnel until recharge, then back up.
This creates a turning as it does this, both down and back up by small margins.

This also creates a dome wave with lowering pressure and gaining pressure as it moves down and back up.

Ah right. So is the dome wave the thing responsible for tides?
 
By the movement of the central super carbon arc movement transferred. The central energy will be acting like a capacitor which stores and releases energy for a brief period which lowers it down a funnel until recharge, then back up.
This creates a turning as it does this, both down and back up by small margins.

This also creates a dome wave with lowering pressure and gaining pressure as it moves down and back up.
Absolute cretin :lol: You havent got a clue man, take the tin foil hat off and go outside once in a while.
 
Back
Top