• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

bobster999 said:
That's a simulation of the mission to explain it. She's cropped the text off it.

Logon or register to see this image
Click to expand...
I have seen that sort of crap before. Someone suggesting NASA are lying, deliberately mislead or alter the evidence (i.e. lie) to support their claim of lies.

There was one I saw that made a big deal about how they had obtained leaked information NASA wanted to hide, showing photos of one of their Mars rovers. They then made all these claims about a rock formation, when all I saw was a rock formation. But on investigating, the image was from the public archive of available rover data. All this NASA tried to hide, leaked from an informant, was actually "I downloaded it from their public website".
 

Anyone have the picture of our solar system where the sun and planets are round except earth which is shaped like a pizza box?
It was on here and I thought I screenshot it but I can’t find it.
 
DaveH said:
How does any of this align with observational evidence?

For example if there is a clear night tonight and I look due north at 51.3 degrees to the horizon, I will see the star Polaris. My longitude is reported on maps as 51.3 degrees. If I take the same set up to my mam's house, I have to increase the angle to 54.9 degrees to see the same star. Why is that?

As you approach the north pole, Polaris gets closer to being directly overhead (90 degrees), while if you head towards the equator it gets lower to the horizon. As you cross the equator it disappears at all, but you start to see the southern cross appear to the south. Why? How?

How can any of this be possible if we live on a flat plate covered in a dome? I can quickly construct a model of exactly how it works on a globe using straight lines of sight, but there is no way to construct a model where it works with a dome of any shape.
Click to expand...
@The Blackcat Mackem Any joy in explaining this basic observational evidence that works on a sphere but not on a biscuit?
 
Anyone seen the youtuber davemckeegan, he does videos on e explaining things that flat earthers raise. He is very good and you always learn things from his vids. Here is one on artemis and things that were mentioned as why they thought things were fake from videos
You must be logged on to see media items
 
I stand by what ive always said.

Lets imagine for one second the earth is flat. Pilots, science and governements have lied to us for generations.....

Lets imagine the flat earthers were right....

My question is this.
Why?

What possible advantage does a hoax about the shape of the world , the vast cost to back it up have to anyone. Except to prove to Columbus he was right all along?

In every other conspiracy theres a logic to why someone might hide the truth. I just dont see it with flat earth.
 
A shame our latest conspiracy loon will not actually debate and discuss evidence. Seems just to be a WUM posting the odd one liner and dubious YouTube links, that the creator most likely gets money from clicks.

That is the real reason some of the biggest conspiracy nuts with YouTube channels were desperate to find anything they could that they could blog about. Is that NASA badge slightly the wrong shade of blue? 10 minute video, click click click and in comes the money.

The best thing to do is not to follow any of the links where there is a monetary advantage to the people posting them.
 
The Blackcat Mackem said:
Dave I dont have all the answers but what I do have is the ability to question what we are told and then go away and seek to verify if its correct. I have over my 71 years discoverd we have been lied to about alomst eveything to keep us timid and scared of Authority and the people who rule us.
Click to expand...
What if the idea of the flat earth is a government psyop to see which people they can control and manipulate into ignoring the truth of the spheroid shape of the Earth?
 
NASA publicly admitted on 2 occasions that the 1969 moon landing was fake. Anyone with half a brain already knew anyway. People who still believe it are even more dumber than flat earthers.
 
Cosmo said:
NASA publicly admitted on 2 occasions that the 1969 moon landing was fake. Anyone with half a brain already knew anyway. People who still believe it are even more dumber than flat earthers.
Click to expand...
Have you been assessed by a professional?
hairynaker said:
Another good video about that idiot that says the moon landings are fake.

You must be logged on to see media items
Click to expand...
I could only listen to that smug arrogant prick for so long before I had to switch it off. That astronaut dude should have jumped up and decked the fat shit.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top