Nukehasslefan
Winger
What is it that you understand?I understand it
just fine, you clearly do not
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What is it that you understand?I understand it
just fine, you clearly do not
Retrograde motion and the stupidity of thinking a naturally occurring projector would just by chance recreate the exact impression of it in our sky.What is it that you understand?
I'd like you to explain how a so-called planet can about turn and go the other way. Or is it an optical illusion?Retrograde motion and the stupidity of thinking a naturally occurring projector would just by chance recreate the exact impression of it in our sky.
Right without going over too many and apologies for the small writing but...
Easy.I'd like you to explain how a so-called planet can about turn and go the other way. Or is it an optical illusion?
I wonder what would explain this in reality.
Then tweak it to suit.Right without going over too many and apologies for the small writing but...
It's 13k km from joburg to Tokyo and only 11k km from joburg to durban Australia (in the real world) on your drawing Australia is much further away from joburg than Japan?
I'm asking how Australia is further away on your layout when it's not when you fly it?Then tweak it to suit.
Ok so nothing is going backward, just appearing to. And what you see in the sky just appears to go backward at certain times but is an optical illusion...right?Easy.
Stand and watch someone walk in circles around a post or some point. See how they appear from a distance to be moving from side to side?
Then do the same thing only this time watch from in between them and the post.
Then once you have mastered that, watch again but this time you walk around the post too. At the same time, but at different speed.
At some point in what we could call 'your orbit' around that post, the other person would appear to be moving backwards in relation to your post.
Tweak it to suit. I haven't used any ruler to scale any of it, I just threw in approximates for the map you asked for.I'm asking how Australia is further away on your layout when it's not when you fly it?
CorrectOk so nothing is going backward, just appearing to. And what you see in the sky just appears to go backward at certain times but is an optical illusion...right?
In my simplified model no, but to accurately show what we can see you would have been walking around the post while spinning and I thought that might be a bit beyond you.There's no argument for a spinning globe in this.
Nah just tweak it to suit, like science wouldn'tI'm asking how Australia is further away on your layout when it's not when you fly it?
State of this reply manThen tweak it to suit.
Still talking absolute garbage I seeOk so nothing is going backward, just appearing to. And what you see in the sky just appears to go backward at certain times but is an optical illusion...right?
There's no argument for a spinning globe in this.
Tweak it to suit. I haven't used any ruler to scale any of it, I just threw in approximates for the map you asked for.
If you want to scale it where you think I'm wrong and to fit your distance, then by all means do so.
Well no I was on about positioning.Ok so nothing is going backward, just appearing to. And what you see in the sky just appears to go backward at certain times but is an optical illusion...right?
There's no argument for a spinning globe in this.
Tweak it to suit. I haven't used any ruler to scale any of it, I just threw in approximates for the map you asked for.
If you want to scale it where you think I'm wrong and to fit your distance, then by all means do so.
...that would have made science lessons fun....but so elegantly unhinged it deserves to be included in every school curriculum.
It's all up to you to do whatever you think, or not.Well no I was on about positioning.
If I move joburg closer to australia than Japan then the London distances don't work?
So what I'm saying is up to now you can't provide a layout for a flat/lemon squeezer map that works with known distances?
You did say our 2d maps and the lemon squeezer map was representative.
Do you want to put those 4 or 5 places where you think they should go roughly?
I mean you know a hell of a lot about the intricacies of your cell world so popping those 5 on a circle should be a doddle
Because you have been proven wrong on every single thing you say. Your standard response when asked a question about your garbage theory is "Its not up to me to show anything, its all on you". Classic deflection tactics from someone so far out of his depth that he has tied himself up in knots with all of his rubbishIt's all up to you to do whatever you think, or not.
I gave you what you asked for and I'll leave it there for you to ponder, or not.
And you offer nothing once again.Because you have been proven wrong on every single thing you say. Your standard response when asked a question about your garbage theory is "Its not up to me to show anything, its all on you". Classic deflection tactics from someone so far out of his depth that he has tied himself up in knots with all of his rubbish
So you can't make any map you have said is representative of your world work with known distances.It's all up to you to do whatever you think, or not.
I gave you what you asked for and I'll leave it there for you to ponder, or not.
You decide whatever you feel is best for you.So you can't make any map you have said is representative of your world work with known distances.
Finally we got there.
I dont have to as its been offered countless times to you by other people on the thread. You just either ignore and deflect away from it or flat out say its fake like an arrogant ignorant condescending clown.And you offer nothing once again.