• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space


Nukehasslefan said:
Hard to tell with some of you, to be fair.
It doesn't matter though, I don't take it to heart.
Click to expand...
To be fair, we have been talking at cross purposes. There is no triangle as the light is reflected from the dome above the earth. I assume this light can be reflected anywhere and cause the shadows on the sticks to be in a pattern.

I just saw the dome comment.
Nukehasslefan said:
The stick not allowing the light to penetrate it which leaves a gap and size depending on sun angle off the dome.
Click to expand...
That's fair enough. I don't suppose you can explain how the light is reflected off the dome?
 
Last edited:
Harry Angstrom said:
That's fair enough. I don't suppose you can explain how the light is reflected off the dome?
Click to expand...
Yep.
From the centre of Earth the energy from within projects that energy towards the dome in waves.
If the dome was not there, those waves would be absorbed into the blackness we see in the sky at night.
However, the reason it reflects back to us is because of the ice dome. It acts like a perfect reflecting mirror back to the ground, of that energy.

The very same goes for all the points of light and anything else we see in that sky that is not man made.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Yep.
From the centre of Earth the energy from within projects that energy towards the dome in waves.
If the dome was not there, those waves would be absorbed into the blackness we see in the sky at night.
However, the reason it reflects back to us is because of the ice dome. It acts like a perfect reflecting mirror back to the ground, of that energy.

The very same goes for all the points of light and anything else we see in that sky that is not man made.
Click to expand...
I have no idea how any of that works but if that is what you believe I agree that no one will be able to counter it with conventional science.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Yep.
From the centre of Earth the energy from within projects that energy towards the dome in waves.
If the dome was not there, those waves would be absorbed into the blackness we see in the sky at night.
However, the reason it reflects back to us is because of the ice dome. It acts like a perfect reflecting mirror back to the ground, of that energy.

The very same goes for all the points of light and anything else we see in that sky that is not man made.
Click to expand...

This is utter bollocks. A heat source in that shines onto a dome which then reflects back to earth. Ice melts very easily. But it somehow manages to give temperatures on earth at different points up to and above 40°c, but that doesn't melt the dome of ice. Also the area around this source of heat from the earth is so cold and inhospitable nobody could ever get there without perishing.
Pure fantasy.
 
What A Waster said:
This is utter bollocks. A heat source in that shines onto a dome which then reflects back to earth. Ice melts very easily.
Click to expand...
It does if you put direct friction onto it for a prolonged period.
But then again the ice above is not the same as the ice below.
And the friction is nowhere near what it is below, as in where we are.
Take the time to get the tid bits and you might get a better understanding from my side.


What A Waster said:
But it somehow manages to give temperatures on earth at different points up to and above 40°c, but that doesn't melt the dome of ice.
Click to expand...

It's all about wavelengths and the spreading out of them.
What A Waster said:
Also the area around this source of heat from the earth is so cold and inhospitable nobody could ever get there without perishing.
Click to expand...

Exactly. Which is what I've been trying to tell you about the trek towards the centre. Can you remember?
What A Waster said:
Pure fantasy.
Click to expand...
It could well be but it makes a million times more sense to me than a fantasy spinning globe in a space vacuum with a 93 million mile ball of fire over 2 millions miles in circumference throwing light and warmth at us.
And you're welcome to that fantasy.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Yep.
From the centre of Earth the energy from within projects that energy towards the dome in waves.
If the dome was not there, those waves would be absorbed into the blackness we see in the sky at night.
However, the reason it reflects back to us is because of the ice dome. It acts like a perfect reflecting mirror back to the ground, of that energy.

The very same goes for all the points of light and anything else we see in that sky that is not man made.
Click to expand...
Want happended to the diffuser reflector?

And how is a perfect reflector when bits fall off to give the illusion of meteors?
 
Nobby said:
Want happended to the diffuser reflector?
Click to expand...
What diffuse reflector?
Nobby said:
And how is a perfect reflector when bits fall off to give the illusion of meteors?
Click to expand...
The fall is through super fluids.
The dome is never solid in all parts. It breathes. It moves. Super fluid waves.
The energy is reflected from this and it leaves behind icicles which drop off with regularity and friction burn back into gas.
You see them as shooting stars and meteors and such.
 
What A Waster said:
This is utter bollocks. A heat source in that shines onto a dome which then reflects back to earth. Ice melts very easily. But it somehow manages to give temperatures on earth at different points up to and above 40°c, but that doesn't melt the dome of ice. Also the area around this source of heat from the earth is so cold and inhospitable nobody could ever get there without perishing.
Pure fantasy.
Click to expand...
Sorry but I'm coming round to him.

If one person has a construct of reality then no one else can counter that construct. For all that he knows we are all figments of his imagination.

It is quite an interesting philosophical question he has posed. I like it.
 
Nobby said:
This diffuser reflector
Click to expand...
Ahh right, so you think the reflection is off a diffuser because I said icicles on the dome would be like them.

As the sun energy moves around the dome it leaves icicles. Those icicles fall off.
I was asked what the icicles were like and I mentioned to think about a diffuser panel or something.
You've taken that as a dome that looks like a diffuser panel even when the sun passes over it...right?

You take that as you want to.
 
BigPete said:
If it was possible then it would have been done and documented.

Be the smoking gun for the flat earth lot.
Click to expand...
Why would they document something like that?
Maybe they could pretend they've shot a laser at the moon but really it's a dome hit and back. You know, stuff like that.
I'm not saying that's the case but it could be a maybe.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Why would they document something like that?
Maybe they could pretend they've shot a laser at the moon but really it's a dome hit and back. You know, stuff like that.
I'm not saying that's the case but it could be a maybe.
Click to expand...

To prove that there is an earth dome and that space is all bollocks?

People don't accept muses as proof they want proven facts which have been tested
Also they could but YOU could test it out for yourself if think everything is a conspiracy
 
BigPete said:
To prove that there is an earth dome and that space is all bollocks?
Click to expand...
Oh you mean the sceptics?
Maybe the laser required may be far too powerful to be had to achieve this.
BigPete said:
People don't accept muses as proof they want proven facts which have been tested
Click to expand...
That's fine because I'm not asking for anyone to accept anything alternate to their own set narratives.
I'm merely giving out my thoughts and it's down to those viewing that as to whether they have some food for thought or pass all of it off as pointless thinking time.

It doesn't change my view, either way.
BigPete said:
Also they could but YOU could test it out for yourself if think everything is a conspiracy
Click to expand...
I could if I could get a laser to bounce off the dome but I don't know if it's feasible for the ordinary Joe or if it's feasible at all.
I would hazard a guess that there could be something....but....that is a guess.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Oh you mean the sceptics?
Maybe the laser required may be far too powerful to be had to achieve this.

That's fine because I'm not asking for anyone to accept anything alternate to their own set narratives.
I'm merely giving out my thoughts and it's down to those viewing that as to whether they have some food for thought or pass all of it off as pointless thinking time.

It doesn't change my view, either way.

I could if I could get a laser to bounce off the dome but I don't know if it's feasible for the ordinary Joe or if it's feasible at all.
I would hazard a guess that there could be something....but....that is a guess.
Click to expand...
What conventional theories of the world do you actually think resemble reality?

My favourite is Darwin's Theory. It is elegant simple, profound and beautiful.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top