Hongkongphooey
Striker
Staggering that Donald is still hanging around like a bad f*cking smell mateStaggering , isn’t it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Staggering that Donald is still hanging around like a bad f*cking smell mateStaggering , isn’t it
DisgustingStaggering that Donald is still hanging around like a bad f*cking smell mate
It concluded clubs receiving parachute payments were three times more likely to be promoted than other clubs.
You'd think that would be the case, but no, the money goes back to premier league clubsSurely you mean EFL clubs (or maybe you don’t !)
They used to be very expensive but they’ve gone down a lot.How much is it to buy a parachute ?
AyeWe managed to get relegated with them.
Parachute Payments should be reduced for every 10m you make in player sales
The haves keeping it in-house...
Parachute payments should be scrapped all together. It's giving the relegated clubs a huge unfair advantage over the rest of the league and why should they be rewarded for failure?Parachute Payments should be reduced for every 10m you make in player sales
Irrelevant post.Did the smb whinge about parachute payments when we were getting them? Can’t remember seeing much about it
we must have had our fair share, and possibly would of went to financial ruin without it, just because the teams coming down have better assets to sell on isn't their fault. If we were ran properly to start with we wouldn't have landed in the positions we were.Did the smb whinge about parachute payments when we were getting them? Can’t remember seeing much about it
How the fuck is it irrelevant likeParachute payments should be scrapped all together. It's giving the relegated clubs a huge unfair advantage over the rest of the league and why should they be rewarded for failure?
Clubs should have relegation clauses in the player's contract to either accept a pay cut or contracts be terminated if they are relegated.
Irrelevant post.
So prior to this season, only 10 teams in Championship history had won 66 points or more after 32 games.
Leicester (78 points), Leeds (69), Southampton (67) and in fairness Ipswich (66) all surpassing that in just one season.
Any guesses as to what 3 teams have the highest wage bills in the league, all sustained with the use of parachute payments?
1) Leicester - £60m
2) Southampton - £40m
3) Leeds - £39m
The next closest is £24m FFS
If Ipswich keep going at their current rate, they're going to end up with one of the highest points totals in Championship history and still have no chance of going up automatically because they are competing against 3 PL clubs in all but name.
The system now allows relegated teams to sustain a PL level squad and wage bill in the Championship and has long since jumped the shark in terms of what they were originally intended for.
It's in need of a serious revamp, just and because our parachute payments were abused close to a decade ago doesn't change that fact before people start.
Southampton brought in £200 million in salesCan't believe I'm defending Leicester but you have to judge their finances with their transfer business. They sold over £100M worth of players when relegated and brought in £44M worth so that netted them £60M that could be used before parachute payments were needed. Southampton sold £102M and only brought in £21.5M. Leeds sold and bought the same approximate amounts. And this is the real problem. Clubs have big, expensive squads in the EPL so can sell one or two on relegation but maintain their overall quality without even touching parachute payments. Whereas the rest of us are lucky to sell one big player but then have to revert to charity shop purchases and hope their value increases.