D
Deleted member 45378
Guest
I know you mean well as the 2nd statement proves... But I think you worded the 1st statement slightly wrongThe babies are the least of it in the suffering... those poor families
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know you mean well as the 2nd statement proves... But I think you worded the 1st statement slightly wrongThe babies are the least of it in the suffering... those poor families
Lets see what happens then.The police obviously believe they have a strong case but its up to a jury to hear the full evidence and decide
Part of "the game" to get a conviction, most people have her guilty already..If she's guilty she deserves life without parole and her life to be made hell.... But being charged doesn't mean your guilty therefore should not be named at this stage
I think the families are suffering more now and forever more than the babies did.I know you mean well as the 2nd statement proves... But I think you worded the 1st statement slightly wrong
It's obviously not as cut and dried as some would make out. This is the 3rd time they have had her in. There will be a lot of circumstantial evidenceVery strange. She deserves a fair trial and judging by how long they have been investigating it might be a complex one.
If guilty should never see the light of day again.