• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

NUFC Sportswashing 2022

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mackem2017 said:
Oh dear

You must be logged on to see media items
Click to expand...
wont be taken advantage of. chris wood 25m :lol:
Cookie said:
Here is the Ian Huntley analogy for the Mags takeover.

Ian Huntley gets released from Frankland or wherever the disgusting individual resides with £10 in his pocket.

He uses £5 to buy a share in Tesco and the other £5 to buy ingredients for sandwiches.

He sets up a stall called 'Ian Huntley's Sandwiches' and starts making (and trying to sell) his bait.

Now - would you boycott Tesco because of Huntley's minor (and singularly non-influential) share ownership or would you boycott his solely owned and controlled sandwich enterprise?
Click to expand...
does he watch disney as well? thats the clincher
 
Last edited:
Redandwhitedust said:
That works as well, in response to the Disney whataboutery.

The reason I like the pub analogy though, is because people have some loyalty and affection to their pub in the same way they have an affection to their team. People love their local.

But even so, if Saville and Huntley bought it outright, no one would defend them if they bought a local pub to clean up their image. No one would say "they've done out the toilets, put in craft beer and sky sports - they're trying to change".

But in football.... suddenly genocidal murderers are canny. Because they've bought Chris Wood


Sensible business. Sort of thing Ashley would have done. And been shouted at for!
Click to expand...
the same analogy would be they've done fuck all to the pub but might change it and put sky and new toilets in, in a few decades time
 
jlaws said:
And then you get this....

You must be logged on to see media items
Click to expand...
They campaigned to be bought and revel in ownership by a regime that enables noncery on a national scale. I'd say something about MBS, but I'm sure he and Epstein just bonded over their shared taste in shit football teams.
 
Cookie said:
Here is the Ian Huntley analogy for the Mags takeover.

Ian Huntley gets released from Frankland or wherever the disgusting individual resides with £10 in his pocket.

He uses £5 to buy a share in Tesco and the other £5 to buy ingredients for sandwiches.

He sets up a stall called 'Ian Huntley's Sandwiches' and starts making (and trying to sell) his bait.

Now - would you boycott Tesco because of Huntley's minor (and singularly non-influential) share ownership or would you boycott his solely owned and controlled sandwich enterprise?
Click to expand...
Depends, what kind of sandwiches is he making?
 
Jeans winding the scum up :lol:

You must be logged on to see media items
You must be logged on to see media items
You must be logged on to see media items
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top