Essentially if the price was 300m, PIF put in 240m and JR/AS 30m each. They already made a statement about putting 39m of working capital to cover Bruce severance and potentially buying a manager out of contract. On the assumption that the split is still 80:10:10 then JR/AS will have put a further3.9m in. I don't have many ITK contacts but I am reliably informed PIF are loaning AS this, which is perfectly legal. You can see why as she is the public face and serves a purpose. If they, say put a further 150m in and AS and JR don't put the 15m in then the split goes down to 7.8/7.8 & 84.4%. Then if the put in another 280m next season the split goes down to 5/5/95.
You could argue that it is pointless AS and JR being involved if each year they need to put in 15m/20m to maintain the 10% stake. Obviously they all hope their is some huge sponsorship deal but when you are talking about 30m plus 4 x 150 k p/w for Trippier you realise that won't touch the sides. If they do stay involved this points to a sale down the line. The club were bough for less than 2 x earnings whereas the top Prem teams are valued at between 4-6 x earnings.
But they are light years away from the other teams:
You must be logged on to see media items
So to say double earnings to the level of Arsenal (c350m) and sell for 3-4 x that at say 1bn would need a huge expenditure on players, a new stadium, a new training ground....Besides a new buyer is going to see through any rise in revenue if it purely came from a big Saudi sponsor who could walk away.
I am 100% certain there is a twist in the tail here.