Maybe a Delusion of the feckers.what is the collective noun for a group of mags... you know like the murder of crows
... is it a protest of mags?
Or an Entitlement.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe a Delusion of the feckers.what is the collective noun for a group of mags... you know like the murder of crows
... is it a protest of mags?
Their own message boards are garbage, maybe that's why they come on here
There’s a few decent mags on the board, the rest are f***ing idiots.
Shame as years ago there was a decent balance of them
You must be logged on to see external links
Aye been posting on here since 2005.....Some may say fredthefan has reemerged since these few wins for them lot up the road.
Sounds like the worst tactic ever, reet lads we're gonna lose a bunch of games then go on a run so we're safe.
Rather than try win every game
They'd be in the relegation zone if not for that result, was a brilliant result fair play to them mind.
Man C presumed they would just turn up, if that costs them the title be funny.
Pep should have known better will probably learn from it though.
I can't think of anyone I'd less want to interact and have a conversation with than a Mag who comes on a Sunderland message board. Seriously. Why would they be here except to play the hard nut, the attention seeker or the wind-up merchant?
Like naughty children, ignore them and they'll go away and bother somebody else.
There are a few variations, including:what is the collective noun for a group of mags... you know like the murder of crows
... is it a protest of mags?
A bunch of twatsThere are a few variations, including:
- a conventicle of magpies
- a gulp of magpies
- a mischief of magpies
- a tidings of magpies
- a tittering of magpies.
I lean towards conventicle, defined as:
"a secret or unlawful religious meeting, typically of nonconformist punchers of horses."
There's always that, of course. Then again, that's not really a collective noun, more a philosophical treatise, or perhaps a general term of truthful abuse. Black & White shite is always decent: what it lacks in specificity it more than makes up for in rhythm & rhyme.A bunch of twats
I’m currently on holiday and there is a mag three doors down.
Everyone knows he is a mag and he is acting like a f***ing Bellend.
Even mrs said “I now know what you are in about”.
Everything you imagine them to be is rolled up in to one big massive cock.
The arnly two words I'd possibly take issue with are "acting like"....I’m currently on holiday and there is a mag three doors down.
Everyone knows he is a mag and he is acting like a f***ing Bellend.
Even mrs said “I now know what you are in about”.
Everything you imagine them to be is rolled up in to one big massive cock.
The arnly two words I'd possibly take issue with are "acting like"....
An infestation of mags ?There are a few variations, including:
- a conventicle of magpies
- a gulp of magpies
- a mischief of magpies
- a tidings of magpies
- a tittering of magpies.
I lean towards conventicle, defined as:
"a secret or unlawful religious meeting, typically of nonconformist punchers of horses."
BennyWhat I don't understand is that there is a team in there that Benny refuses to let out.
10 men behind the ball from the off. Hit it long for Rondon, hope he can control it, and run like fuck to catch him if he does. This appears to be Benny's game plan no matter who they play.
When they go a goal behind, & he's forced to change things, they show that can actually play football.
He wearing his 'toon' top constantly
Putting his accent on more than usually would so people know he's a Geordie even if the top doesn't give it away?
Ya AREEET LIKE PET
It can happen this way, but it's very unlikely;
Southampton have -15 goal difference, we have -12. So if Southampton lost by a single goal and Wolves win 4-0 we'd be 18th due to having scored less than Southampton.
And Burnley winning away to Brighton.
I was being facetious saying "0% chance", but that was just to counter you saying "every chance".
See above