• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Newcastle fc

Status
Not open for further replies.
Brian Griffin said:
But you know what - yeah you're right - you're the expert, not me.

Although I've flipped between the two, I initially started with 'little to nothing' I do believe updating your twitter account leads to zero sales in any consumer market - and if I walked into a business tomorrow I would have zero hesitation in saying it will generate no sales and you're wasting your time.
Click to expand...
He’s like a puppy chewing at you trouser leg, I think it’s time to let him go, he’ll never learn.
 

janey said:
Didn’t the Mags go to Court to say the action was illegal or something and it was thrown out. If that’s the case and the Court sided with HMRC I can’t see it being nothing
Click to expand...
They did indeed, the bit that seems to me to magnify things for me, is the arresting of Lee Charnley.
Done, I'm fairly sure, so that he had no opportunity to hinder the proceedings.
 
samaistonsrightfoot said:
Genuinely interested how that can be done.
Click to expand...

You know those cookie messages you click 'ok' to on every website you visit - that's how.

The company has installed a 'pixel' on their website - not just one page - but every page - and your PC keeps this on its hard drive - eg if you've been looking at black vauxhalls and then white volvos - it logs it.

When you go to your social media account if the company has an active account or campaign, the social media account looks for the cookie on your machine and brings up the content it wants you to see - ie the black vauxhalls and white volvos...exactly the same ones.

If you interact further - via the content on the social media account - it puts another cookie on your machine - so the next time you visit the social media account it presents you with a hidden webpage (or landing page) that you can only get to with the cookie. When you have this installed on your machine you tend to get the offers etc you don't see on websites.

It's all very clever - designed to present you with only the information you want to see - black vauxhalls and white volvos....but never a blue ford.
 
Brian Griffin said:
You know those cookie messages you click 'ok' to on every website you visit - that's how.

The company has installed a 'pixel' on their website - not just one page - but every page - and your PC keeps this on its hard drive - eg if you've been looking at black vauxhalls and then white volvos - it logs it.

When you go to your social media account if the company has an active account or campaign, the social media account looks for the cookie on your machine and brings up the content it wants you to see - ie the black vauxhalls and white volvos...exactly the same ones.

If you interact further - via the content on the social media account - it puts another cookie on your machine - so the next time you visit the social media account it presents you with a hidden webpage (or landing page) that you can only get to with the cookie. When you have this installed on your machine you tend to get the offers etc you don't see on websites.

It's all very clever - designed to present you with only the information you want to see - black vauxhalls and white volvos....but never a blue ford.
Click to expand...
Is this true @Sima ?
 
Brian Griffin said:
:lol:



Deliberately ignoring the rest of the post.

You ready to concede you're wrong about SD and their social media activity?
Click to expand...

No point in addressing it if you're flitting between opinions as I don't know which angle you're going to take on your response. You might go back to zero and I'll address that and you might use your 'little and I'd address that. If you can't make your mind up I'm wasting my time tbh.

Unless I have all of Sports Direct's historical website conversion data in front of me I'll not bother conceding tbf. But I can't be arsed debating with you someone who can't make their mind up either.
 
Stubbs ftm said:
31st Jan is usually the deadline for self assessment payments, 31st July if you have payments on account to make too. If you filled online you tend not to get a bill in the post either.

How long has it been now since the raid? 7 month? I reckon there will be an awful lot of information to go through and it will take time while they build the case.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure the raid happened when I was in Portugal. That was April or May 2017
 
Sima said:
No point in addressing it if you're flitting between opinions as I don't know which angle you're going to take on your response. You might go back to zero and I'll address that and you might use your 'little and I'd address that. If you can't make your mind up I'm wasting my time tbh.

Unless I have all of Sports Direct's historical website conversion data in front of me I'll not bother conceding tbf. But I can't be arsed debating with you someone who can't make their mind up either.
Click to expand...

I've told you - I started with 'little to zero' but I now for clarity stand by 'zero'.

Why do you need to see their website conversion when we're talking about selling from organic impressions?

Here's some reading for you:

You must be logged on to see external links


You must be logged on to see external links


You must be logged on to see external links


And that's without even trying. Happy reading.
 
Sima said:
Not at all, just the logic that suggests that attendances tailed off only as a protest to Short's stewardship. Logically, now Short is no longer here all of those 'stayways' should be flooding back.

You're attendances are very good for where you are.
Click to expand...

I've already dispelled that myth that you'd like to create. If you think that none of the supporters that stayed away last season and returned this season was down to Short leaving you're either immensely thick (and I genuinely don't believe you are) or blinded by bias
 
Sima said:
No point in addressing it if you're flitting between opinions as I don't know which angle you're going to take on your response. You might go back to zero and I'll address that and you might use your 'little and I'd address that. If you can't make your mind up I'm wasting my time tbh.

Unless I have all of Sports Direct's historical website conversion data in front of me I'll not bother conceding tbf. But I can't be arsed debating with you someone who can't make their mind up either.
Click to expand...
Do yasel a favour and log off you boring man
 
Brian Griffin said:
I've told you - I started with 'little to zero' but I now for clarity stand by 'zero'.

Why do you need to see their website conversion when we're talking about selling from organic impressions?

Here's some reading for you:

You must be logged on to see external links


You must be logged on to see external links


You must be logged on to see external links


And that's without even trying. Happy reading.
Click to expand...
Ok. I've no idea what led up to this post, but those articles are from the dark ages.

I own a marketing agency and have repeatedly used a planned social media strategy for my customers This year, Social Media is by far the most successful growth strategy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top