• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Newcastle fc

Status
Not open for further replies.
Love Spreads said:
Skunkers has more Sunderland supporters on it, and has had Mods who support Sunderland. Judging by your posts on here, you could do with interacting more with different types of people.
Click to expand...
Always handy drawing out mags, then straight to ignore.
 

keybuk said:
How on earth did you see my post? You have us all on ignore. In fact you never tire of telling the world how clever you are by putting us on ignore.
Click to expand...
Put Up all these posts where I tell the world Imhave you on ignore. The truth is I did once put quite a few of the boring mag posters on ignore but it meant that I couldn't properly follow most threads so it didn't last long.
I did put one gormless mag on ignore recently but he started a thread about my club that other SAFC fans turned into an interesting debate so I had to take him off ignore to participate. As it stands I have no one on ignore and rarely have anyone on ignore.

Magpie 1 said:
Do you finish every post to Newcastle fans with the words Log off.
Who are you the master of the Internet.
Click to expand...
If I recommend you log off it means you are a Wanker. I only ever advise Wankers to log off.
When are you logging off ?
 
Last edited:
T_Bone said:
Put Up all these posts where I tell the world Imhave you on ignore. The truth is I did once put quite a few of the boring mag posters on ignore but it meant that I couldn't properly follow most threads so it didn't last long.
I did put one gormless mag on ignore recently but he started a thread about my club that other SAFC fans turned into an interesting debate so I had to take him off ignore to participate. As it stands I have no one on ignore and rarely have anyone on ignore.


If I recommend you log off it means you are a Wanker. I only ever advise Wankers to log off.
When are you logging off ?
Click to expand...

After you.
 
T_Bone said:
Put Up all these posts where I tell the world Imhave you on ignore. The truth is I did once put quite a few of the boring mag posters on ignore but it meant that I couldn't properly follow most threads so it didn't last long.
I did put one gormless mag on ignore recently but he started a thread about my club that other SAFC fans turned into an interesting debate so I had to take him off ignore to participate. As it stands I have no one on ignore and rarely have anyone on ignore.


If I recommend you log off it means you are a Wanker. I only ever advise Wankers to log off.
When are you logging off ?
Click to expand...
Ignore and your user name comes up with 125 matches. Obviously they all won't be perfect matches but it is clear from them that you can't make your mind up whether or not to have people on ignore. I'm not privy to your personal settings and I don't have a photographic memory. Clearly though from the number of matches you've been bleating on about the ignore facility for ages.

I'm in the mood to chat with the mags
Alright lads, just got in
Micky gray: Light at the end of the tunnel.
Mags in the stadium
Anyone else’s grief off the skunks off the scale like mine has been ?
Anyone else’s grief off the skunks off the scale like mine has been ?

Mackemed said:
Bloody hell man, I was actually trying to make it obvious that I was stringing you along, and you still bit like a herd of piranhas around a fresh bit of dead carcass. :lol:

Newcastle fans man :lol::lol::lol::lol:

Fewminnnngggggg!!!!!!!!!! :evil::evil::evil::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
Click to expand...
Sadly with so many of you banging on relentlessly since your visit a few years back it's hard to see who believes what on here.
 
Last edited:
keybuk said:
Ignore and your user name comes up with 125 matches. Obviously they all won't be perfect matches but it is clear from them that you can't make your mind up whether or not to have people on ignore. I'm not privy to your personal settings and I don't have a photographic memory. Clearly though from the number of matches you've been bleating on about the ignore facility for ages.

I'm in the mood to chat with the mags
Alright lads, just got in
Micky gray: Light at the end of the tunnel.
Mags in the stadium
Anyone else’s grief off the skunks off the scale like mine has been ?
Anyone else’s grief off the skunks off the scale like mine has been ?


Sadly with so many of you banging on relentlessly since your visit a few years back it's hard to see who believes what on here.
Click to expand...
I very rarely use the ignore function. I can only think of one SAFC poster I have ever had on ignore. I have told you above of the occasions when I have put mags on ignore, that's it.
In any case, what's it got to do with you when and if I use the ignore function ?
Only a sad knacker would research my posts as you have.
You need to get out more.
 
keybuk said:
Ignore and your user name comes up with 125 matches. Obviously they all won't be perfect matches but it is clear from them that you can't make your mind up whether or not to have people on ignore. I'm not privy to your personal settings and I don't have a photographic memory. Clearly though from the number of matches you've been bleating on about the ignore facility for ages.

I'm in the mood to chat with the mags
Alright lads, just got in
Micky gray: Light at the end of the tunnel.
Mags in the stadium
Anyone else’s grief off the skunks off the scale like mine has been ?
Anyone else’s grief off the skunks off the scale like mine has been ?


Sadly with so many of you banging on relentlessly since your visit a few years back it's hard to see who believes what on here.
Click to expand...
Out of 24,270 posts by him over eight years on here, so on average once every 194 posts.

With your username, however, there are 19 matches out of your 655 posts: so you mention 'ignore' every 34 posts.

Seems to me that you're the one who's been bleating about it during your less than a year on here.
 
AlpineExile said:
Out of 24,270 posts by him over eight years on here, so on average once every 194 posts.

With your username, however, there are 19 matches out of your 655 posts: so you mention 'ignore' every 34 posts.

Seems to me that you're the one who's been bleating about it during your less than a year on here.
Click to expand...
:lol: this is the SMB version of the Alamo :lol:
 
T_Bone said:
Put Up all these posts where I tell the world Imhave you on ignore. The truth is I did once put quite a few of the boring mag posters on ignore but it meant that I couldn't properly follow most threads so it didn't last long.
I did put one gormless mag on ignore recently but he started a thread about my club that other SAFC fans turned into an interesting debate so I had to take him off ignore to participate. As it stands I have no one on ignore and rarely have anyone on ignore.


If I recommend you log off it means you are a Wanker. I only ever advise Wankers to log off.
When are you logging off ?
Click to expand...
:lol::lol::lol:

AlpineExile said:
Out of 24,270 posts by him over eight years on here, so on average once every 194 posts.

With your username, however, there are 19 matches out of your 655 posts: so you mention 'ignore' every 34 posts.

Seems to me that you're the one who's been bleating about it during your less than a year on here.
Click to expand...
Oof direct hit amidships. Another horsehater consigned to Davy Jones locker. Aar Aaar
 
Last edited by a moderator:
keybuk said:
I'm not sure why you lot have such an obsession with Wembley. It's just another ground and thanks to the greed of the FA an overused ground. When clubs were only able to play there in the FA Cup final, League Cup Final or Charity Shield it had a lot more kudos.

As for blaming Ashley, well oddly enough you are probably correct. Had he sanctioned the purchase of a striker better equipped than Dwight Gayle then we probably would have won there. This has been obvious all season. The rest of the pitch is incredibly well organised and competent most of the time. They were shambolic for 60 minutes against Watford.
Click to expand...
The rest of the pitch is all down to Rafa.
The shite up front is all down to Ashley.
Is this what you're trying to say?:lol:
 
I noticed he posted a link to a thread of mine about being in the mood to chat to the mags.

As ever being a mag it flew right over his head of my reason to post that. It helped to top up my ignore feature section, when one of the numbnuts replied on there.

Flies around shite basically
 
AlpineExile said:
Out of 24,270 posts by him over eight years on here, so on average once every 194 posts.

With your username, however, there are 19 matches out of your 655 posts: so you mention 'ignore' every 34 posts.

Seems to me that you're the one who's been bleating about it during your less than a year on here.
Click to expand...
On the contrary, I have never encouraged anyone to use the ignore facility nor used it myself.

I could be accused of bleating on about people who are enthusiastic about using it and encourage others to do the same.

It's a forum FFS. If you don't want to read an alternative point of view don't read the posts.
 
keybuk said:
Ignore and your user name comes up with 125 matches. Obviously they all won't be perfect matches but it is clear from them that you can't make your mind up whether or not to have people on ignore. I'm not privy to your personal settings and I don't have a photographic memory. Clearly though from the number of matches you've been bleating on about the ignore facility for ages.

I'm in the mood to chat with the mags
Alright lads, just got in
Micky gray: Light at the end of the tunnel.
Mags in the stadium
Anyone else’s grief off the skunks off the scale like mine has been ?
Anyone else’s grief off the skunks off the scale like mine has been ?


Sadly with so many of you banging on relentlessly since your visit a few years back it's hard to see who believes what on here.
Click to expand...
To be fair, I see the ignore function as a tad weak, however it's each to their own. As far as the skunks are concerned I have no problem in applauding the dogs abuse that they get. I am Sunderland through and through and would never dream of going on to their bandwidth to chat with them, simply because I can't f***ing stand the *****, so coming on here and bleating about how they aren't happy about this or that or him or her is slightly ludicrous. It just makes me happy because I can laugh at them even more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top