Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So the premier league play 24 games and division 1 only play 20 games. I can't see how that can be done. Also assume means 3 teams go down next season which again isn't fair.Probably easiest and fairest if they just promote both teams and accept that there will be a team with a free weekend each week next season. Not a bad thing to have a Saturday off at some point. Just put it down to an experience we all hope doesn’t arise again.
Do Gateshead Fell get a retrospective automatic loss too? Are you going to review the circumstances of all the other Covid voids earlier in the season?So the premier league play 24 games and division 1 only play 20 games. I can't see how that can be done. Also assume means 3 teams go down next season which again isn't fair.
Only 1 team should go up and it has to be Newcastle with the details we are aware of. If there is an issue with Willington then that changes it for me and Castle Eden go up as Willington will get automatic loss for the game
Do Gateshead Fell get a retrospective automatic loss too? Are you going to review the circumstances of all the other Covid voids earlier in the season?
If it’s clear from the start of the season 3 go down then it’s absolutely fair.So the premier league play 24 games and division 1 only play 20 games. I can't see how that can be done. Also assume means 3 teams go down next season which again isn't fair.
Only 1 team should go up and it has to be Newcastle with the details we are aware of. If there is an issue with Willington then that changes it for me and Castle Eden go up as Willington will get automatic loss for the game
Relegating over 23% of teams would be ridiculous.isnt that irrelevant though? Teams had to isolate then, at this time only individuals did. Sounds like Willington ‘isolated’ their whole team which wasn’t supposed to happen.
If it’s clear from the start of the season 3 go down then it’s absolutely fair.
We’re in the world of supposition unfortunately. To me, all teams knew what they needed to do going in to the last round of games, Castle Eden came up just short.isnt that irrelevant though? Teams had to isolate then, at this time only individuals did. Sounds like Willington ‘isolated’ their whole team which wasn’t supposed to happen.
If it’s clear from the start of the season 3 go down then it’s absolutely fair.
Do they have a sunday, third team, academy or junior teams ?IF there is evidence that Willington "knew" the week before that they were struggling to put out 2 teams. And, there is evidence that Willington players were "at a festival" then, surely the NEPL have to investigate that ?
Whether this has any bearing on the Promotion argument, I am not sure.
No need as isolation rules changes middle of August which minimised close contacts isolating etc. Prior to this change more players would have had to isolate if a player was in close contact with their team matesDo Gateshead Fell get a retrospective automatic loss too? Are you going to review the circumstances of all the other Covid voids earlier in the season?
It’s scandalous if a club has been allowed to field a second team if the first team has pulled out of a game because of a few injuries, illnesses or cases of Covid.
if this has been allowed it sets a very very dangerous precedent. The first team should always take priority
^This.This needs to be looked at.
You should always fulfill the 1st team fixture ahead of anything else.
To say "It's just not cricket" covers it nicely !^This.
A few years ago I played in a second team game along with four other players from our mid-week eleven - all well over the age of 50 - with the other seven all under 18 - some as young as 12/13.
The reason was that most of the normal second team lads, and a lot of the first team, had all gone away on holiday together for a stag do.
The combined age that day of the wicket-keeper, two slips and gully came to around 220!
Different circumstances, and pre-Covid, I know, but the point is that all fixtures were fulfilled, even though the first team was severely weakened.
A club should never turn out a second team when on the same day they've cancelled the first team fixture, for whatever reason. It's just wrong.
I believe one team were given dispensation from the league to field a 2nd team game, and COVID off a 1st team game, as it would be unsafe for the juniors in the 2nd team to play at first team level and could put junior cricketers off the game for life if something was to happen. I don't think this was linked to the final game of the season but this has definitely been agreed at some point this season. I think in this situation, it is entirely acceptable to play a 2nd team fixture on the same day a 1st team fixture is off.
In a normal season I’d agree, this season has been anything but normal. League has been pragmatic in getting as many games played to the best standard possible in extremely challenging circumstances for clubs.That's creating a precedence that will be open to misuse
Castle Eden have lost their appeal
2nd X1 will be playing TCC next seasonVery sad, but inevitable. From a TCC point of view, it's a shame we can't visit a lovely ground that most of us have never been to before, but a 10 minute journey to Jesmond can't be sniffed at.
Replacing Boldon?2nd X1 will be playing TCC next season
2nd X1 got promotedReplacing Boldon?