Fights it out with young for No 1 jerseyWhat about Elborg, were does he fit in?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fights it out with young for No 1 jerseyWhat about Elborg, were does he fit in?
Or perhaps not.Great news but you'd expect a journalist to know the answer to 4+1 mind
Don't know, maybe still back upWhat about Elborg, were does he fit in?
Personally I'd loan him out next season it get some quality experience behind him.What about Elborg, were does he fit in?
Patterson isn't good enoughPersonally I'd loan him out next season it get some quality experience behind him.
Get a domestic no. 2 in or keep Patterson as no. 2
For no. 2 he isPatterson isn't good enough
He’s not because, as we’ve seen this season, even a number 2 is likely to get some appearances over the course of a full season.For no. 2 he is
He's not so if roefs gets injured for a few months next season you are happy having him in goal expect us to struggle thenFor no. 2 he is
He's preforming extremely well at the top of the championship this season and last for us. He's definitely good enough as no. 2He’s not because, as we’ve seen this season, even a number 2 is likely to get some appearances over the course of a full season.
Yes also see my answer aboveHe's not so if roefs gets injured for a few months next season you are happy having him in goal expect us to struggle then
Personally, I disagree that he performed ‘extremely well’ last season for us.He's preforming extremely well at the top of the championship this season and last for us. He's definitely good enough as no. 2
We really need to be mindful of the home grown rule and having a no. 2 and no. 3 ad HG will free up those spaces else where in the squad.
If we do go down that route, which other HG keeper would you have at no. 2? Ramsdale?
There aren't many HG keepers out there
And the club have proven they don't think he's good enough hence how he's on loan at the moment and we signed 2 KeepersHe's preforming extremely well at the top of the championship this season and last for us. He's definitely good enough as no. 2
We really need to be mindful of the home grown rule and having a no. 2 and no. 3 ad HG will free up those spaces else where in the squad.
If we do go down that route, which other HG keeper would you have at no. 2? Ramsdale?
There aren't many HG keepers out there
Yes also see my answer above
We aren't in a position to have top quality as no. 2. Patterson has proved he's a very capable keeper at a really high standard
I doubt he wants to sit on the bench likePersonally I'd loan him out next season it get some quality experience behind him.
Get a domestic no. 2 in or keep Patterson as no. 2
He was good enough to be no. 2 for the first half the season though. He wanted to play footballAnd the club have proven they don't think he's good enough hence how he's on loan at the moment and we signed 2 Keepers
Probably not but choice does he have I've that's the way we go?I doubt he wants to sit on the bench like
Why didn't we keep patto as number 2 till the summer plus he's at an age where he should be wanting to play every weekHe was good enough to be no. 2 for the first half the season though. He wanted to play football
Like I said I'd rather use our back up keepers for the HG spots to free up positions out field.
As we already have Patterson and Moore here, job done.
Let's say we do let Patterson go, send Ellberg out on loan and use the no. 2 as HG which better keeper is out there who would be no. 2??????????
Probably not but choice does he have I've that's the way we go?
He’ll definitely be away in the summer.Why didn't we keep patto as number 2 till the summer plus he's at an age where he should be wanting to play every week
We allowed him to go because we got Ellberg in last minute. No Ellberg and he would be still no. 2Why didn't we keep patto as number 2 till the summer plus he's at an age where he should be wanting to play every week
Not sure it really has to be I'd rather have competent back up which I don't think he is, yep we got ellborg in because they don't trust patto or think ellborg is better possibly bothWe allowed him to go because we got Ellberg in last minute. No Ellberg and he would be still no. 2
Answer my question though which HG no. 2 would you have instead of Patterson?
Waste of a place which should be used for an outfield player.Not sure it really has to be I'd rather have competent back up which I don't think he is, yep we got ellborg in because they don't trust patto or think ellborg is better possibly both
He can take hjelde spot it's not really an issue as they brought ellborg in plus we will be getting more under 21 players inWaste of a place which should be used for an outfield player.
We need to be really smart with HG quota
I disagree him not being good enough for no. 2.