• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

LVCC Yorkshire v Durham

Status
Not open for further replies.
Have we ever had 3 centurions in the same innings?

Ever had a centurion at 8?

Brill... Plunkett might have slogged a few runs & bowled a few decent eye catching spells but he is still utter shite!
 

I thought we had before Colly left for england, but could be wrong
 
Borthwick gets Jaques. Yorkies 72-2.[DOUBLEPOST=1377787966][/DOUBLEPOST]Tea 82-2. I am claiming that session for us as well and I want 3 more wickets in the days final session, which should leave us sitting pretty going into day three.
 
Last edited:
well done tyne, you called it

Scotty to run through them on the degrading pitch pls
 
We did it twice at the back end of the 2009 season. MdV (200), Coetzer, Shiv, Benks against Notts. And MdV, Shiv (200), Benksagainst Worcs

Have we ever had 3 centurions in the same innings?

Ever had a centurion at 8?

Brill... Plunkett might have slogged a few runs & bowled a few decent eye catching spells but he is still utter shite!
 
So we've had a 4 ton innings?[DOUBLEPOST=1377790450][/DOUBLEPOST]Gale gone!
 
Must say, I've been listening for half an hour or so since coming in from work and we don't sound very threatening. Williamson and Bairstow don't sound in any trouble whatsoever.

Good thing we've got so many runs on the board to play with.[DOUBLEPOST=1377793431][/DOUBLEPOST]
Worcester away in 2011 apparently the last time we had three centurions in an innings.

Source - Tim Wellock.



Also the famous A Shankar game :lol:
 
Half way through now and after a first day mauling for the Tykes, today was pretty even. Day 3 is huge in terms of the championship.
 
Any news on why stokes went missing?

He bowled later on in the day so seems fine.

Have to say that's two days to us. Need to get the better of tomorrow too though. The objective has to be 7 wickets by Tea. If we can do that we'll probably have stopped them getting the follow-on total but we have to then bat again, score quick runs and set up a target. The way the pitch seems to have played I'd say we have to be bowling (fourth innings) by the fourth morning. Unless we skittle them quickly tomorrow I can't see how making them follow-on would help us due to how difficult taking wickets seems. That said, anything short of 400 is probably quite achievable on that surface too, so we need to get a move on either way if setting them a target.

Unfortunately I see the draw being the most likely outcome :confused:
 
Also the famous A Shankar game :lol:
Interestng character. This is off Wiki:

"Doubts about his age also circulated at Lancashire, with rumours saying his was 3 years older than he claimed he was. Sutton confronted Shankar on these rumours, and when asked why the rumours existed, Shankar claimed he was on a for the first three years of his life, saying this made his body physically three years younger than it was. When Sutton questioned the fact he would still continue to grow under these circumstances, he replied "no I didn't" and proceeded to walk off."

Sounds reasonable to be honest :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top