Levante...

[gazza.1990]

No im im Roma and dont give a shit about any manc crap

Good job he's on about Levante then ain't it.

 

[Vauxie]

Good job he's on about Levante then ain't it.

Levante is Beni mate

 

[robbied1]

In all fairness ticket sale revenue is pretty much irrelevant now in the premier league, and clubs outside the premier league are themselves irrelevant such is the nature of the game.

And your point is?? There's alot more clubs that rely on season ticket sales than the premier league clubs and to say it's irrelevant for them, well you are wrong there. If it was so irrelevant they would charge a pittance

 

[Gibraltar Mackem]

I’m fairly sure Las Palmas done the same thing last season.

 

[kildaremackem]

It's not exactly a great business plan. I think most fans in england are happy to buy season tickets as long as they are priced decently

levante cant compete financially with the big teams..maybe if they charged money it would help..and then by being more competitive they could get more fans that way..

In all fairness ticket sale revenue is pretty much irrelevant now in the premier league, and clubs outside the premier league are themselves irrelevant such is the nature of the game.

ots not irrelavnt in the poremier legaue thats a myth-its 10-5 oper cent of the turnover of big clubs..thats a lot of cash and funds a player or ytwo..the sixze of the crowd then helps put up the prices they can charge spondsorss..which is another huge chunk of revenue.
if it were irrelavnt-the best run club in the elague-spurs -wouldnt have boirthered building another stadium to inrease capacity and get more money.
they do five times the revenu of man city on matchday now.,..about the wages of four top playuers in the difference..so spurs can keep progressing..and oits more than man utd generate by about two fold..which is about one a dn ahalf good players...thats why spurs will stay ahead of man utd now..

 

[Marv]

levante cant compete financially with the big teams..maybe if they charged money it would help..and then by being more competitive they could get more fans that way..


ots not irrelavnt in the poremier legaue thats a myth-its 10-5 oper cent of the turnover of big clubs..thats a lot of cash and funds a player or ytwo..the sixze of the crowd then helps put up the prices they can charge spondsorss..which is another huge chunk of revenue.
if it were irrelavnt-the best run club in the elague-spurs -wouldnt have boirthered building another stadium to inrease capacity and get more money.
they do five times the revenu of man city on matchday now.,..about the wages of four top playuers in the difference..so spurs can keep progressing..and oits more than man utd generate by about two fold..which is about one a dn ahalf good players...thats why spurs will stay ahead of man utd now..

From the Guardian's review of Pemier League finances: Premier League finances: the full club-by-club breakdown and verdict

By match-day revenue:

Man Utd: £110m
Arsenal: £99m
Man City: £57m
Newcastle: £24m
Liverpool: £81m

Typically Arsenal were top, but for the season in question they were out of the CL so their income dropped.

When you say best run club, what you mean is a club that has no problem in charging its fans >£1,000 for season tickets. I'd imagine that Spurs would be looking to match Arsenal's match-day revenue of £100m. No way though are they going to earn 5 x the rest of the league.

The London clubs have an in-built advantage in that they can charge higher prices because that's the one place in England where there is some serious money.

 

[happy feet]

The coffee shop in Teesside?

It can't be the one in spenny that closed years ago.

 

[kildaremackem]

From the Guardian's review of Pemier League finances: Premier League finances: the full club-by-club breakdown and verdict

By match-day revenue:

Man Utd: £110m
Arsenal: £99m
Man City: £57m
Newcastle: £24m
Liverpool: £81m

Typically Arsenal were top, but for the season in question they were out of the CL so their income dropped.

When you say best run club, what you mean is a club that has no problem in charging its fans >£1,000 for season tickets. I'd imagine that Spurs would be looking to match Arsenal's match-day revenue of £100m. No way though are they going to earn 5 x the rest of the league.

The London clubs have an in-built advantage in that they can charge higher prices because that's the one place in England where there is some serious money.

does pusr ground have a larger capaity tan aresenals? and this coming season sopurs will be in the cl again..arsenal wont..though aersenal may get more games in their competion than sours do in theirs.

sours are charging the right price if they are selling out the games..

 

[gipetto]

It can't be the one in spenny that closed years ago.

Aye that one. Probs.

 

[Marv]

does pusr ground have a larger capaity tan aresenals? and this coming season sopurs will be in the cl again..arsenal wont..though aersenal may get more games in their competion than sours do in theirs.

sours are charging the right price if they are selling out the games..

Capacity was supposed to be 62,000 but they weren't getting that at the end of the season. I'd imagine their match day revenues will be similar to Arsenal, but not 5 x their rivals. And remember they have to repay the stadium borrowing costs. I still don't know how they ended up paying a £1B for a stadium when grounds like SOL, the Etihad have been built at a fraction of the cost. But still you say they are the best run club in the country;

 

[Rip Van Fish]

People would still moan that they have no priority over UK members etc

At last....

A Walsall ticket going a long way

 

[Motor City Cobra]

In all fairness ticket sale revenue is pretty much irrelevant now in the premier league, and clubs outside the premier league are themselves irrelevant such is the nature of the game.

Incorrect