Legal Bods

Status
Not open for further replies.


Glad we got to the bottom of this. I got more pelters than the op on here. Accused of giving bad advice. :lol:

Remember people read your policy and use it.
And don’t always take a coppers advice or believe them.
A lot on here told the lad to plead guilty. Now that’s bad advice.
 
the boot said:
Hopefully @duff_man will apologise to us both. I doubt it.
Click to expand...

I have been to court for this exact thing numerous times where the driver has been found guilty. The copper backed down, I wouldn’t have and would’ve let the bench decide.

I am in court in a couple of weeks with a very similar thing but with possession of a fraudulent document thrown in as well. I will keep you informed
 
duff_man said:
I have been to court for this exact thing numerous times where the driver has been found guilty. The copper backed down, I wouldn’t have and would’ve let the bench decide.

I am in court in a couple of weeks with a very similar thing but with possession of a fraudulent document thrown in as well. I will keep you informed
Click to expand...
Totally different innit. The person you are going to court knew he/she wasn’t insured and tried to cover it up with a printed cover note or policy. Where they will probably say they were sold it by a salesman at the door and documents sent out. That’s old school.
Keep me informed and I’m here for any other advice mate.
 
the boot said:
Totally different innit. The person you are going to court knew he/she wasn’t insured and tried to cover it up with a printed cover note or policy. Where they will probably say they were sold it by a salesman at the door and documents sent out. That’s old school.
Keep me informed and I’m here for any other advice mate.
Click to expand...

Not different at all. They had their own insurance but the car they were driving didn’t have a policy. Car got seized and EFPN issued. He later produced a forged document for the other car to try and show there was cover on it when there wasn’t. Promptly arrested, interviewed with solicitor present who advised him to make a full and frank admission. Charged with fraud offences in relation to the document and driving without insurance and the EFPN cancelled to save seperate court dates. Job done.
 
duff_man said:
Not different at all. They had their own insurance but the car they were driving didn’t have a policy. Car got seized and EFPN issued. He later produced a forged document for the other car to try and show there was cover on it when there wasn’t. Promptly arrested, interviewed with solicitor present who advised him to make a full and frank admission. Charged with fraud offences in relation to the document and driving without insurance and the EFPN cancelled to save seperate court dates. Job done.
Click to expand...

Totally different. I had insurance to drive the car, hence the charges were dropped.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pop
mickonline said:
Totally different. I had insurance to drive the car, hence the charges were dropped.
Click to expand...
He won’t answer mate. If you look at my first post of the thread you will see why.
He would still take you to court even after your insurance company said you were covered. That about says it all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top