Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bradman's debut was a bit underwhelming
You must be logged on to see external links
Bradman's debut was a bit underwhelming
You must be logged on to see external links
79 and 112 in his second game
You must be logged on to see external links
40 and 58 in his third game
123 and 37 n.o in his fourth
and so on...
Tendulkar scored 15 and DNB in his first test
Lara 44 and 5
Tendulkar was 16 when he made his debut
Tendulkar was nurtured by experienced cricket coaches from an early age, Bradman taught himself to play by hitting a golf ball off a wall with a cricket stump.
Ricky Ponting rates Lara as the better of the two what are
people's opinion on here? Personally I agree with him.
You must be logged on to see external links
Nurtured or not, he was 16. 16!!
Wayne Rooney was only 17 when he debuted for England and may well break Bobby Charlton's goal scoring record. Does this make him the best England striker of all time?
Bradman was 20 when the average age of cricketers was 30-odd.
Bush cricket to world record holder in three years.
Tendulkar is not even in the top 20 batsmen for averages.
Anyway Wisden agrees with me so ner.
Number 19 on the list likeWayne Rooney was only 17 when he debuted for England and may well break Bobby Charlton's goal scoring record. Does this make him the best England striker of all time?
Bradman was 20 when the average age of cricketers was 30-odd.
Bush cricket to world record holder in three years.
Tendulkar is not even in the top 20 batsmen for averages.
Anyway Wisden agrees with me so ner.