• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Keel Crossing [opened 18.10.25] - compendium thread


Synchronous lateral excitation​


Caused by 2000 people
That should hopefully not be an issue here. It doesn't look like a "lightweight" bridge, the design should also look at dynamic loading and the natural frequency of the structure.

Anyway I'm not sure it's a serious post from the OP. Maybe he could be first over though?
 
Imagine if this thread ends up tragically bumped
Being involved in any accident would likely mean a decent payout from the council. I know when they re-did the anti-vandal / climb paint on the wear bridge I ended up with a load on my clothes and hands. I got a 2 grand payout, court agreed with me it wasn’t cleared marked as anti vandal paint.
That should hopefully not be an issue here. It doesn't look like a "lightweight" bridge, the design should also look at dynamic loading and the natural frequency of the structure.

Anyway I'm not sure it's a serious post from the OP. Maybe he could be first over though?
Serious on my behalf, they really aren’t things that should be messed around with. The level of footfall this bridge will see is genuinely unmatched anywhere for a footbridge.
 
Does anyone know if there is a plan in place to test how it holds up under the weight of full match-day footfall? It almost feels like we are being made the guinea pigs to test its strength. A mate of mine was on a run down the river, he worked on the Megyeri Bridge whilst living out in Budapest and said he had some real worries about the standard of work on our new footbridge. He said the abutments (end supports for transferring loads) didn’t look sufficient for the loads it would need to transfer on a matchday.
Your mate is an idiot
 
Being involved in any accident would likely mean a decent payout from the council. I know when they re-did the anti-vandal / climb paint on the wear bridge I ended up with a load on my clothes and hands. I got a 2 grand payout, court agreed with me it wasn’t cleared marked as anti vandal paint.

Serious on my behalf, they really aren’t things that should be messed around with. The level of footfall this bridge will see is genuinely unmatched anywhere for a footbridge.
There are "footbridges" all around the London stadium and Wembley as well as others all over which have a capacity greater than the SOL
 
Does anyone know if there is a plan in place to test how it holds up under the weight of full match-day footfall? It almost feels like we are being made the guinea pigs to test its strength. A mate of mine was on a run down the river, he worked on the Megyeri Bridge whilst living out in Budapest and said he had some real worries about the standard of work on our new footbridge. He said the abutments (end supports for transferring loads) didn’t look sufficient for the loads it would need to transfer on a matchday.

Alright Len, the foundations sinking yet??
 
David Bruce said at the talk in tonight that it actually has a capacity of 10 average people, or 6 mags. Match day stewards will operate a traffic light system to retain structural integrity.
Edit, link didn't work
There are bridges with signs which do say maximum capacity 10 persons. Hope they put them up
 
Last edited:
Does anyone know if there is a plan in place to test how it holds up under the weight of full match-day footfall? It almost feels like we are being made the guinea pigs to test its strength. A mate of mine was on a run down the river, he worked on the Megyeri Bridge whilst living out in Budapest and said he had some real worries about the standard of work on our new footbridge. He said the abutments (end supports for transferring loads) didn’t look sufficient for the loads it would need to transfer on a matchday.
It's been tested, Mickey Quinn walked back and forth 8 times.
 
Does anyone know if there is a plan in place to test how it holds up under the weight of full match-day footfall? It almost feels like we are being made the guinea pigs to test its strength. A mate of mine was on a run down the river, he worked on the Megyeri Bridge whilst living out in Budapest and said he had some real worries about the standard of work on our new footbridge. He said the abutments (end supports for transferring loads) didn’t look sufficient for the loads it would need to transfer on a matchday.
I am pretty sure they know what they are doing mate.

The machinery they have been using to load the bridge up probably puts more of a point load on the structure than a few thousand people spread along the length will on a match day.

But just to be on the safe side, you and your mate should probably avoid it and go the long way round for every match for at least the first ten years just in case. Tell everyone you know the same please. Its just not worth the risk.

PS - My profession is as a design engineer working in the construction industry. Its true what people say down the pub, none of us have any training or a clue what we are doing and most of it is just guess work. We just 'sit at desks all day'.;):lol:
 
Last edited:
If it should collapse, try and jump up before it hits the ground and you'll be OK.If you're on the part that hits the water and you can't swim, try and gab on to the fattest blob floating around.
 
Back
Top