• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Josh Hull


Average over 50 and has played just 9 first class games do we really not have someone better at this stage? He might become a decent player but he should be being allowed to develop first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bri
If he doesn't get the nickname emu there is no justice in the world.
Does feel like another hunch pick but I said that about Bashir and he's been quite good, so who knows
Olly Stone turning in a poor performance at the riverside didn't help his cause.
 
Last edited:
It’s very much a reach at this stage of his career 7 wickets at 182 this season in division 2 he also can’t bat toffee.

You do wonder why this current set just ignores county form completely.
TBF, they made a good call about Bashir. Despite having a short and inauspicious county record he has looked a decent test bowler.
 
It’s very much a reach at this stage of his career 7 wickets at 182 this season in division 2 he also can’t bat toffee.

You do wonder why this current set just ignores county form completely.
I think it’s their way of saying “we’ll do things our way”.

It makes a mockery of the CC and will lead to more players taking lucrative contracts in the shorter forms of cricket
 
I can see why they picked him.. very tall and a left hander.
But, only 11 1st class wickets, has only bowled 184 overs in 9 matches. Not only has his body not yet matures but neither has his brain, yet. I would have given him another couple of years, personally.

England, as we know, are super hot on managing fast bowlers workload, how are they going to do that on tour when the pressure is on? I wonder how they'll feel if he breaks down.

Having said that, there is a history on picking players who have talent young and without masses of experience. Gower, Botham both first picked around the same time and around the age of 21. And Stokes, of course at the age of 23(?), however Stokes didn't bowl much at first because of injury iirc.

Hogg must be taking looking at this and wondering if it can happen for him too - only a few months younger and a better wickets/match ratio (on the basis on one match).
 
Are they not just calling him up to have him in and around the set up? Surely he won’t play?
They'll be looking at bowlers to see how they get on within the team and if they gel, Flintoff left England squad cos he didn't gel with Buttler
Are they not just calling him up to have him in and around the set up? Surely he won’t play?
Not playing
 
Last edited:
3/375 this season

I know he’s still young, but is he the most mental pick of the bazball era?

Last year I went to see Leicestershire vs Gloucestershire at Grace Road. You could see he was fast. He was also wayward. After bowling several beamers the umpire removed him from the bowling attack for dangerous bowling. No point being fast if you can't bowl a good line and length consistently.

If anything, he represents that misguided obsession with pace associated with the bazball period.
 
Watched him in the ODC final in 2023 and he was fantastic.

Wouldn’t surprise me if England’s “coaching” has set him back.
 
Back
Top