Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why would we not have just activated his release clause weeks ago which was lower than that bid?
they aren't going to play every single game this season we need depthWhere’s he going to play like ?hes not replacing Ballard or alderette the way they played on Saturday
If we've increased it to that wonder why we didnt just pay the release clause earlier on when it was stil active.You must be logged on to see media items
Again? We are like Whitesnake!I think we'll see an here we go today
Cover in case of injury / suspension just look at Seelt on SaturdayWhere’s he going to play like ?hes not replacing Ballard or alderette the way they played on Saturday
Good point.Release clause had to be in 1 payment rather than spread out in instalments, so much worse for us in terms of cash flow and PSR
Can’t have a marquee signing without a camp.I love the idea of players having “camps” like medieval war lords in tents plotting strategy
He’s not going to come as cover for 27 millionthey aren't going to play every single game this season we need depth
Is it not the same? Thats about £23m. Release clause probably needed it all in full aswellWhy would we not have just activated his release clause weeks ago which was lower than that bid?
Release clauses need paid in full on the spotWhy would we not have just activated his release clause weeks ago which was lower than that bid?
Don’t think it would affect PSR at all would it?Release clause had to be in 1 payment rather than spread out in instalments, so much worse for us in terms of cash flow and PSR
Every one likes to haggle. If we thought we might save a few mill at the time we’d be mugs not to. Very easy to advise people how to spend THEIR moneyIf we've increased it to that wonder why we didnt just pay the release clause earlier on when it was stil active.
Transfer fees are amortised over the length of the contract for PSR purposes anyway aren't they?Release clause had to be in 1 payment rather than spread out in instalments, so much worse for us in terms of cash flow and PSR
We aren’t paying £20+m for him to be back up. As unpalatable as it is, Alderete and Lucumi will be our two first choice centre half’s.Cover in case of injury / suspension just look at Seelt on Saturday
I think if we end up with Reinildo or Cirkin at centre half we will have needed Lucimi.I genuinely don't think we need him now. We've got Alderete, O'Nien and Reinildo who can play on the left side of defence... Possibly Cirkin too at a push.
Use the money for him and the winger money and just get amad. Seriously it makes perfect sense!
Ballard has been on excellent form lately but I think history shows that he is fairly injury prone. Hopefully he stays fit and that's all behind him, but he only managed 20 apps for us last season.Where’s he going to play like ?hes not replacing Ballard or alderette the way they played on Saturday
I think cirkin or and Roberts might go and we'll bring in another striker and wingerSo now our first team squad looks a little like
Roefs/Patterson
Hume/Mukiele
Reinildo/Cirkin/Masuaku
Ballard/Alderete/Lucumi/ O Nien?
Xhaka/Sadiki/Diarra/Le Fee/Rigg/Neil
Adingra/Talbi/Roberts/ Mundle
Mayenda/Guiu/Isidor
24 man squad there. Allowed 25, and honestly looking at it I can't see which position we'd go for. I'm all for putting faith in the front 3, why wouldn't you when two of them have just scored in the opening day, if a striker is to be replaced though it'd be Isidor. 4 strikers in a squad for one position just wouldn't work.
Can we sticky the post regarding PSR and them wanting the release clause in one payment?